Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(06): 698-702
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735560
Original Article

Cranioplasty

Adrian A. Ong 
1   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
James P. Manning
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
,
Aurora G. Vincent
1   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Arya W. Namin 
1   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Weitao Wang 
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
,
Yadranko Ducic
1   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Calvarial defects are commonly encountered after neurosurgical procedures, trauma, and ablative procedures of advanced head neck cancers. The goals of cranioplasty are to provide a protective barrier for the intracranial contents, to restore form, and prevent syndrome of the trephined. Autologous and alloplastic techniques are available, each with their advantages and drawbacks. A multitude of materials are available for cranioplasty, and proper timing of reconstruction with attention to the overlying skin envelope is important in minimizing complications.

Keywords

cranioplasty - cranial reconstruction - pediatric cranioplasty - alloplastic - autologous

Note

The work herein does not necessarily represent the views of the United States Government, Department of Defense, or its affiliates.




Publication History

Article published online:
14 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Sanan A, Haines SJ. Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (03) 588-603
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jeyaraj P. Importance of early cranioplasty in reversing the “syndrome of the trephine/motor trephine syndrome/sinking skin flap syndrome”. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015; 14 (03) 666-673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Liang W, Xiaofeng Y, Weiguo L. et al. Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (03) 526-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 33: 39-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Quah BL, Low HL, Wilson MH. et al. Is there an optimal time for performing cranioplasties? Results from a prospective multinational study. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 13-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Songara A, Gupta R, Jain N, Rege S, Masand R. Early cranioplasty in patients with posttraumatic decompressive craniectomy and its correlation with changes in cerebral perfusion parameters and neurocognitive outcome. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 303-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Alkhaibary A, Alharbi A, Alnefaie N, Oqalaa Almubarak A, Aloraidi A, Khairy S. Cranioplasty: a comprehensive review of the history, materials, surgical aspects, and complications. World Neurosurg 2020; 139: 445-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kshettry VR, Hardy S, Weil RJ, Angelov L, Barnett GH. Immediate titanium cranioplasty after debridement and craniectomy for postcraniotomy surgical site infection. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (1, Suppl Operative): discussion 14–15 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Valentini V, Cassoni A, Marianetti TM, Romano F, Terenzi V, Iannetti G. Reconstruction of craniofacial bony defects using autogenous bone grafts: a retrospective study on 233 patients. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (04) 953-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cabbad NC, Stalder MW, Arroyave A, Wolfe EM, Wolfe SA. Autogenous bone cranioplasty: review of a 42-year experience by a single surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (06) 1713-1723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van de Vijfeijken SECM, Münker TJAG, Spijker R. et al; CranioSafe Group. Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2018; 117: 443-452.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wiggins A, Austerberry R, Morrison D, Ho KM, Honeybul S. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates–14 years experience. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (02) 248-256 , discussion 256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cabraja M, Klein M, Lehmann TN. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26 (06) E10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hanasono MM, Goel N, DeMonte F. Calvarial reconstruction with polyetheretherketone implants. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (06) 653-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Marbacher S, Andres RH, Fathi AR, Fandino J. Primary reconstruction of open depressed skull fractures with titanium mesh. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (02) 490-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M. et al. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29 (06) 1077-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Camarini ET, Tomeh JK, Dias RR, da Silva EJ. Reconstruction of frontal bone using specific implant polyether-ether-ketone. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (06) 2205-2207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shah AM, Jung H, Skirboll S. Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (04) E19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tark WH, Yoon IS, Rah DK, Park BY, Kim YO. Osteoconductivity of porous polyethylene in human skull. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (01) 78-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lake PA, Morin MA, Pitts FW. Radiolucent prosthesis of mesh-reinforced acrylic. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1970; 32 (05) 597-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Blum KS, Schneider SJ, Rosenthal AD. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997; 26 (01) 33-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jaberi J, Gambrell K, Tiwana P, Madden C, Finn R. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (02) e81-e88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goiato MC, Anchieta RB, Pita MS, dos Santos DM. Reconstruction of skull defects: currently available materials. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (05) 1512-1518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gilardino MS, Cabiling DS, Bartlett SP. Long-term follow-up experience with carbonated calcium phosphate cement (Norian) for cranioplasty in children and adults. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (03) 983-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kwiecien GJ, Aliotta R, Bassiri Gharb B, Gastman B, Zins JE. The timing of alloplastic cranioplasty in the setting of previous osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (03) 853-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lopez J, Zhong SS, Sankey EW. et al. Time interval reduction for delayed implant-based cranioplasty reconstruction in the setting of previous bone flap osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 394e-404e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fu KJ, Barr RM, Kerr ML. et al. An outcomes comparison between autologous and alloplastic cranioplasty in the pediatric population. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (03) 593-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Burdi AR, Huelke DF, Snyder RG, Lowrey GH. Infants and children in the adult world of automobile safety design: pediatric and anatomical considerations for design of child restraints. J Biomech 1969; 2 (03) 267-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Abu-Ghname A, Banuelos J, Oliver JD, Vyas K, Daniels D, Sharaf B. Outcomes and complications of pediatric cranioplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 433e-443e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wang W, Vincent A, Bahrami A, Shokri T, Inman J, Ducic Y. Progressive scalp thinning over mesh cranioplasty and the role of lipotransfer. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (08) 1926-1931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Cen N, Davis MJ, Abu-Ghname A, Davies LW, Patel KR, Buchanan EP. Foreign body reaction to poly-D-L-lactic acid resorbable plates used in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (07) e741-e744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lopez J, Siegel N, Reategui A, Faateh M, Manson PN, Redett RJ. Absorbable fixation devices for pediatric craniomaxillofacial trauma: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 685-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Coulter IC, Pesic-Smith JD, Cato-Addison WB. et al. Routine but risky: a multi-centre analysis of the outcomes of cranioplasty in the Northeast of England. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (07) 1361-1368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rocque BG, Amancherla K, Lew SM, Lam S. Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 12 (02) 120-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Klieverik VM, Miller KJ, Han KS. et al. Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Childs Nerv Syst 2019; 35 (09) 1473-1480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Schuss P, Vatter H, Oszvald A. et al. Bone flap resorption: risk factors for the development of a long-term complication following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30 (02) 91-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Acciarri N, Palandri G, Cuoci A, Valluzzi A, Lanzino G. Cranioplasty in neurosurgery: is there a way to reduce complications?. J Neurosurg Sci 2020; 64 (01) 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Le C, Guppy KH, Axelrod YV. et al. Lower complication rates for cranioplasty with peri-operative bundle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 120: 41-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar