Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: Modifications for Identifying Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Obstetrical Patients

Abstract

Objective Screening tools, including the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) criteria, have not been validated in the pregnant population. We aimed to determine if pregnancy-specific modifications to the quick SOFA (qSOFA) can improve prediction of severe maternal morbidity in pregnant women with serious infections.

Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with severe infections admitted to a single institution from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity, defined as a composite of adverse maternal outcomes: intensive care unit (ICU) admission for >48 hours, need for invasive monitoring (central line or arterial line), intubation, pharmacologic hemodynamic support (intravenous vasopressors or inotropes), and/or maternal death. A logistic regression was then applied and the resulting predictors were analyzed individually and in combination with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to modify qSOFA for pregnancy, that is, qSOFA-P.

Results Analysis of 104 pregnant patients with severe infections found that the standard qSOFA did not accurately predict severe maternal morbidity (ROC area under the curve [AUC] = 0.54, p = 0.49, sensitivity = 0.38, and specificity = 0.70). Pregnancy-specific modifications or “qSOFA-P” (respiratory rate [RR] ≥ 35 breaths/minute and systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≤ 85 mm Hg) significantly improved prediction of severe maternal morbidity (AUC = 0.77, p < 0.001, sensitivity = 0.79, and specificity = 0.74).

Conclusion The standard qSOFA is a poor screening tool in the prediction of severe maternal morbidity in pregnant patients with infections. A pregnancy-specific screening system, qSOFA-P, improved prediction of severe maternal morbidity in pregnant women with severe infections. Further prospective and large multicenter studies are needed to validate this scoring system in pregnant women.

Key Points

• Validated scoring systems for evaluating pregnant patients with sepsis are needed.

• Modifications to existing systems may improve the evaluation of pregnant patients with sepsis.

• The qSOFA-P (RR ≥ 35 breaths/minute and SBP ≤ 85 mm Hg) includes modifications to qSOFA, and improves the detection of patients who would develop severe maternal morbidity..

Keywords

maternal infection - maternal morbidity and mortality - sepsis - qSOFA - qSOFA-P

Note

This study was presented at the 40th SMFM Annual Meeting—The Pregnancy Meeting, Friday, February 7, 2020; ID number: 59.

Publication History

Received: 04 November 2020

Accepted: 12 August 2021

Article published online:
28 September 2021

• References

• 1 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315 (08) 801-810
• 2 Plante LA. Management of sepsis and septic shock for the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016; 43 (04) 659-678
• 3 Bauer ME, Bateman BT, Bauer ST, Shanks AM, Mhyre JM. Maternal sepsis mortality and morbidity during hospitalization for delivery: temporal trends and independent associations for severe sepsis. Anesth Analg 2013; 117 (04) 944-950
• 4 Al-Ostad G, Kezouh A, Spence AR, Abenhaim HA. Incidence and risk factors of sepsis mortality in labor, delivery and after birth: population-based study in the USA. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41 (08) 1201-1206
• 5 Hensley MK, Bauer ME, Admon LK, Prescott HC. Incidence of maternal sepsis and sepsis-related maternal deaths in the United States. JAMA 2019; 322 (09) 890-892
• 6 Escobar MF, Nasner D, Hurtado CF, Fernández PA, Echavarria MP. Characterization of obstetric patients with sepsis identified by two diagnostic scales at a fourth-level clinic in Colombia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 (01) 71-76
• 7 Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M. et al; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes and Resource Evaluation (CORE). Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. JAMA 2017; 317 (03) 290-300
• 8 Lamontagne F, Harrison DA, Rowan KM. qSOFA for identifying sepsis among patients with infection. JAMA 2017; 317 (03) 267-268
• 9 Jain S, Guleria K, Suneja A, Vaid NB, Ahuja S. Use of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for evaluating outcome among obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 132 (03) 332-336
• 10 Freund Y, Lemachatti N, Krastinova E. et al; French Society of Emergency Medicine Collaborators Group. Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department. JAMA 2017; 317 (03) 301-308
• 11 Bhattacharjee P, Edelson DP, Churpek MM. Identifying patients with sepsis on the hospital wards. Chest 2017; 151 (04) 898-907
• 12 McLymont N, Glover GW. Scoring systems for the characterization of sepsis and associated outcomes. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4 (24) 527
• 13 Williams JM, Greenslade JH, McKenzie JV, Chu K, Brown AFT, Lipman J. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ function assessment, and organ dysfunction: insights from a prospective database of ED patients with infection. Chest 2017; 151 (03) 586-596
• 14 Tusgul S, Carron PN, Yersin B, Calandra T, Dami F. Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2017; 25 (01) 108
• 15 Fadiloglu E, Bulut Yuksel ND, Unal C. et al. Characteristics of obstetric admissions to intensive care unit: APACHE II, SOFA and the Glasgow coma scale. J Perinat Med 2019; 47 (09) 947-957
• 16 Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2004; 5 (01) 11-18
• 17 Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8 (04) 283-298
• 18 Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (04) 932-939
• 19 Blanco Esquivel LA, Urbina JM, Zerón HM. Approach to an obstetric prognosis scale: the modified SOFA scale. Ghana Med J 2016; 50 (03) 129-135
• 20 Oliveira Neto AF, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, Souza RT, Ribeiro do Valle C, Cecatti JG. Exploring epidemiological aspects, distribution of WHO maternal near miss criteria, and organ dysfunction defined by SOFA in cases of severe maternal outcome admitted to obstetric ICU: a cross-sectional study. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018: 5714890
• 21 Bowyer L, Robinson HL, Barrett H. et al. SOMANZ guidelines for the investigation and management sepsis in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 57 (05) 540-55
• 22 Albright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, Rouse DJ, Anderson BL. The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (01) 39.e1-39.e8