Pé torto congênito – O método Ponseti é a solução definitiva?^[*]

Resumo

O pé torto congênito é uma das deformidades mais comuns ao nascimento. A inadequação ou ausência do tratamento provoca sérias limitações aos portadores desta condição. O tratamento inicial pelo método Ponseti garante resultados funcionais superiores a outras modalidades de tratamento propostas anteriormente, porém as recidivas e os pés negligenciados ainda são um desafio na atualidade. O entendimento da fisiopatologia da doença, da anatomia e biomecânica local e uma minuciosa avaliação clínica e radiológica dos pacientes são imprescindíveis para entendermos o limite do método e escolhermos o melhor tratamento.

Palavras-chave

deformidades do pé - pé torto/terapia - anormalidades congênitas - tratamento

^* O presente trabalho foi desenvolvido no Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Publication History

Received: 29 July 2020

Accepted: 23 April 2021

Article published online:
07 December 2021

• Referências

• 1 Mathias RG, Lule JK, Waiswa G, Naddumba EK, Pirani S. Incidence of clubfoot in Uganda. Can J Public Health 2010; 101 (04) 341-344
• 2 Jowett CR, Morcuende JA, Ramachandran M. Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (09) 1160-1164
• 3 Moon DK, Gurnett CA, Aferol H, Siegel MJ, Commean PK, Dobbs MB. Soft-Tissue Abnormalities Associated with Treatment-Resistant and Treatment-Responsive Clubfoot: Findings of MRI Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (15) 1249-1256
• 4 Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. The classic: congenital club foot: the results of treatment. 1963. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (05) 1133-1145
• 5 Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA. Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (01) 22-27
• 6 Kruse L, Gurnett CA, Hootnick D, Dobbs MB. Magnetic resonance angiography in clubfoot and vertical talus: a feasibility study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (05) 1250-1255
• 7 Merrill LJ, Gurnett CA, Siegel M, Sonavane S, Dobbs MB. Vascular abnormalities correlate with decreased soft tissue volumes in idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (05) 1442-1449
• 8 Ippolito E, De Maio F, Mancini F, Bellini D, Orefice A. Leg muscle atrophy in idiopathic congenital clubfoot: is it primitive or acquired?. J Child Orthop 2009; 3 (03) 171-178
• 9 Gelfer Y, Dunkley M, Jackson D. et al. Evertor muscle activity as a predictor of the mid-term outcome following treatment of the idiopathic and non-idiopathic clubfoot. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B [phone]
• 10 Little Z, Yeo A, Gelfer Y. Poor Evertor Muscle Activity Is a Predictor of Recurrence in Idiopathic Clubfoot Treated by the Ponseti Method: A Prospective Longitudinal Study With a 5-Year Follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 2019; 39 (06) e467-e471
• 11 Hosseinzadeh P, Kelly DM, Zionts LE. Management of the Relapsed Clubfoot Following Treatment Using the Ponseti Method. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (03) 195-203
• 12 Thomas HM, Sangiorgio SN, Ebramzadeh E, Zionts LE. Relapse Rates in Patients with Clubfoot Treated Using the Ponseti Method Increase with Time: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev 2019; 7 (05) e6-e16
• 13 Ponseti IV, Campos J. The classic: observations on pathogenesis and treatment of congenital clubfoot. 1972. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (05) 1124-1132
• 14 Ippolito E, Dragoni M, Antonicoli M, Farsetti P, Simonetti G, Masala S. An MRI volumetric study for leg muscles in congenital clubfoot. J Child Orthop 2012; 6 (05) 433-438
• 15 Kerling A, Stoltenburg-Didinger G, Grams L. et al. The congenital clubfoot - immunohistological analysis of the extracellular matrix. Orthop Res Rev 2018; 10: 55-62
• 16 Pierz KA, Lloyd JR, Solomito MJ, Mack P, Õunpuu S. Lower extremity characteristics in recurrent clubfoot: Clinical and gait analysis findings that may influence decisions for additional surgery. Gait Posture 2020; 75: 85-92
• 17 Farsetti P, Dragoni M, Ippolito E. Tibiofibular torsion in congenital clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012; 21 (01) 47-51
• 18 Johnston II CE, Hobatho MC, Baker KJ, Baunin C. Three-dimensional analysis of clubfoot deformity by computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop B 1995; 4 (01) 39-48
• 19 Ganesan B, Yip J, Al-Jumaily A. et al. A novel 3D evaluation method for assessing bone to bone relationships in clubfoot. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2019; 23 (05) 1882-1890
• 20 Stouten JH, Besselaar AT, Van Der Steen MCM. Identification and treatment of residual and relapsed idiopathic clubfoot in 88 children. Acta Orthop 2018; 89 (04) 448-453
• 21 Eidelman M, Kotlarsky P, Herzenberg JE. Treatment of relapsed, residual and neglected clubfoot: adjunctive surgery. J Child Orthop 2019; 13 (03) 293-303
• 22 Holt JB, Oji DE, Yack HJ, Morcuende JA. Long-term results of tibialis anterior tendon transfer for relapsed idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method: a follow-up of thirty-seven to fifty-five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (01) 47-55
• 23 Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (02) 376-380
• 24 Peterson N, Prior C. Correction of the Neglected Clubfoot in the Adolescent and Adult Patient. Foot Ankle Clin 2020; 25 (02) 205-220
• 25 Bouchard M. Guided Growth: Novel Applications in the Hip, Knee, and Ankle. J Pediatr Orthop 2017; 37 (Suppl. 02) S32-S36
• 26 Loza ME, Bishay SN, El-Barbary HM, Hanna AA, Tarraf YN, Lotfy AA. Double column osteotomy for correction of residual adduction deformity in idiopathic clubfoot. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92 (08) 673-679
• 27 Mubarak SJ, Dimeglio A. Navicular excision and cuboid closing wedge for severe cavovarus foot deformities: a salvage procedure. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31 (05) 551-556
• 28 Sølund K, Sonne-Holm S, Kjølbye JE. Talectomy for equinovarus deformity in arthrogryposis. A 13 (2-20) year review of 17 feet. Acta Orthop Scand 1991; 62 (04) 372-374