Homeopathy 2022; 111(04): 235-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736333
Original Research Article

Impact of the National Policy on Integrative and Complementary Practices on Brazilian Public Homeopathy Services

1   Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Julio de Mesquita Filho’, Faculdade de Medicina, Câmpus de Botucatu, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
2   Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP
› Author Affiliations


Background Homeopathy has been experiencing a period of expansion in Brazil due to its practical relevance in the face of new global and national health demands, culminating in the launch in 2006 of the National Policy for Integrative and Complementary Practices (NPICP) by the Ministry of Health of Brazil, which standardized and regularized the position of homeopathy within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

Aims To understand the impact of the guidelines proposed by the NPICP on homeopathy services in the SUS, specifically in the south-east region of Brazil, according to the perceptions of their managers.

Methods This is a descriptive, exploratory research study with a qualitative approach, conducted in homeopathy services in the south-east region of Brazil, through semi-structured interviews and with data processed using content analysis.

Results The data show the importance of the NPICP in regulating and offering homeopathy in the services studied. However, the NPICP's objective of promoting and fully developing integrative and complementary practices has not been achieved because it has failed to translate strategies into actions.

Conclusion Though important to the development of homeopathy services in any given location, policies stated in the NPICP were revealed to have limited impact on the implementation and development of new services. Without further legislation, training programs and appropriate budget allocation, new services will be unable to thrive and their users unable to benefit from a more comprehensive approach to healthcare.


• Current research indicates that, by themselves, national policies to encourage integrative health practices do not guarantee the improvement of homeopathic practice or its use in the Brazilian health system.

• The individual commitment of local professionals sympathetic to homeopathy was responsible for the implementation of homeopathy services, regardless of broad government policies.

• Local plans of action should include clear funding strategies and incentives, professional technical training and research support, as well as improved communication to educate users and to disseminate information about homeopathy.

Publication History

Received: 15 April 2021

Accepted: 07 September 2021

Article published online:
10 December 2021

© 2021. Faculty of Homeopathy. This article is published by Thieme.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Teixeira MZ. Homeopatia: o que os médicos precisam saber sobre esta especialidade médica. Diagn Tratamento 2019; 24: 143-152
  • 2 Pustiglione M, Goldenstein E, Chencinsky IM. Homeopathy: a brief description of this medical specialty. Rev de homeopatia 2017; 80: 1-15
  • 3 Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução CFM n° 1295. Diário Oficial da União; Aug 23, 1989. P. 14.517. Available at: www.cremesp.org.br
  • 4 Ministério da Saúde, Brasil. Política Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares no SUS. Brasília, DF, 2006. Available at: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pnpic.pdf
  • 5 Barros NF, Fiuza AR. Evidence-based medicine and prejudice-based medicine: the case of homeopathy. Cad Saude Publica 2014; 30: 2368-2376
  • 6 Carvalho CA. Viagem ao mundo alternativo: a contracultura nos anos 80. São Paulo: UNESP; 2008
  • 7 Demo MLO, Orth LC, Marcon CEM. Brazil's health-care system. Lancet 2019; 394 (10213): 1992
  • 8 Sigolo RP. Homeopathy, alternative medicine: between counterculture, the New Era, and formalization (Brazil, 1970's). Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos 2019; 26: 1317-1335
  • 9 Ischkanian PC, Pelicioni MCF. Challenges of complementary and alternative medicine in the SUS aiming to health promotion. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum 2012; 22: 233-238
  • 10 Ponelis SR. Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of information systems research in small and medium enterprises. Int J Doc Stud 2015; 10: 535-550
  • 11 Ministério da Saúde, Brasil. CNES: Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde; Brasília, 2017. Available at: cnes.datasus.gov.br
  • 12 Rocha TAH, Silva NCD, Barbosa ACQ. et al. National Registry of Health Facilities: data reliability evidence. Cien Saude Colet 2018; 23: 229-240
  • 13 Galhardi WMP, Barros NF, Leite-Mor AC. Knowledge of the municipal health managers about the National Policy on Integrative and Complementary Practices and its influence on the provision of homeopathy in the Local Unified Health System. Cien Saude Colet 2013; 18: 213-220
  • 14 Massuda A, Hone T, Leles FAG, de Castro MC, Atun R. The Brazilian health system at crossroads: progress, crisis and resilience. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3: e000829
  • 15 Brasil. Lei no. 8080, de 19 de Setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília,1990. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/decreto/d7508.htm
  • 16 Mynaio MCS. Sampling and Saturation in Qualitative Research: Consensuses and Controversies. Pesquisa Qualitativa 2017; 5: 01-12
  • 17 Bardin L. Análise de Conteudo, São Paulo, edições 70. 2016
  • 18 Barros NF, Francisco PMSB, Sousa LA. Lack of management and institutional support for Integrative and Complementary Practices in the Brazilian Unified National Health System. Cad Saude Publica 2020; 36: e00062320
  • 19 Chaudhary A, Khurana A. A review on the role of homeopathy in epidemics with some reflections on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). Indian J Res Homeopathy 2020; 14: 100-109
  • 20 Galhardi WMP, Barros NF, Leite-Mor AC. Homeopathy in the public network of the São Paulo State: facilitating and hindering factors. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. Florianópolis 2012; 7: 35-43
  • 21 Salles SAC. Physicians' motivations for specialization in homeopathy. Rev Bras Educ Med 2005; 29: 167-173
  • 22 Souza IMC. et al. Integrative and complementary practices: provision and production of care in SUS and in selected municipalities. Cad Saude Publica 2012; 28: 2143-2154
  • 23 Teixeira MZ. Special Dossier: Scientific Evidence for Homeopathy. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2018; 64: 93-94
  • 24 Lima KMSV, Silva KL, Tesser CD. Integrative and complementary practices and the relationship with health promotion: experience of a municipal healthcare service. Interface Comunicacao Saude Educ 2014; 18: 261-272
  • 25 Losso LN, Freitas SFT. Implementation level assessment of integrative and complementary practices in Primary Health Care in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Saúde Debate 2017; 41: 171-187
  • 26 Teixeira MZ. Homeopathy: lack of information and prejudice in medical teaching. Rev Bras Educ Med 2007; 31: 15-20
  • 27 Salles SAC. Homeopathy in Brasilian medical schools: results of a exploratory investigation. Rev Bras Educ Med 2008; 32: 283-290
  • 28 Oliveira IF. et al. Homeopathy in Medical Schools: Trajectory of the Universidade Federal Fluminense. Rev Bras Educ Med 2017; 41: 240-250