CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2021; 54(04): 495-500
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739249
Review Article

Managing an Unhappy Patient

1   Cosmetic Plastic Surgery and Laser Super specialities, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2   Desai Hospitals Ventures LLP, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3   Desai Hospitals Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
4   Sarla Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

A clinical study has noted that one out of six patients is perceived as “difficult” by clinicians. Not surprisingly, patient dissatisfaction has to do with multiple factors, both within and outside the control of the surgeon. In the present times of electronic information and ratings, managing difficult patients is a critical skill—a patient's dissatisfactory review could adversely affect a practitioner's reputation built over years of meticulous practice. Patient expectations are often more pronounced in case of elective medical procedures such as hair transplants. The subject of managing an unhappy patient in the context of hair transplantation is, therefore, one that requires due enquiry and is the subject that this article seeks to explore.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 December 2021

© 2021. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Mathers N, Jones N, Hannay D. Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45 (395) 293-296
  • 2 Khanna M. Hair transplantation surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41 (Suppl): S56-S63
  • 3 Adams J, Murray III R. The general approach to the difficult patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1998; 16 (04) 689-700 , v
  • 4 Hull SK, Broquet K. How to manage difficult patient encounters. Fam Pract Manag 2007; 14 (06) 30-34
  • 5 An PG, Rabatin JS, Manwell LB, Linzer M, Brown RL, Schwartz MD. MEMO Investigators. Burden of difficult encounters in primary care: data from the minimizing error, maximizing outcomes study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (04) 410-414
  • 6 Hahn SR, Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. et al. The difficult patient: prevalence, psychopathology, and functional impairment. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11 (01) 1-8
  • 7 Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 2004; 1 (01) 99-111
  • 8 Bensing J, Verheul W, van Dulmen AM. Patient anxiety in the medical encounter: a study of verbal and nonverbal communication in general practice. Health Educ 2008; 108: 373-383
  • 9 Sykes JM. Managing the psychological aspects of plastic surgery patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 17 (04) 321-325
  • 10 Lieberman III JA, Stuart MR. The BATHE method: incorporating counseling and psychotherapy into the everyday management of patients. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 1 (02) 35-38
  • 11 McCarthy JG, Cheatham JG, Singla M. How to approach difficult patient encounters: ROAR. Gastroenterology 2018; 155 (02) 258-261
  • 12 Steinman HK. A method for working with displeased patients-blast. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2013; 6 (03) 25-28
  • 13 Bono MJ, Wermuth HR, Hipskind JE. Medical Malpractice. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021