CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2021; 54(04): 471-476
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739251
Review Article

Optimal Hair Transplant Recipient Site Slit Design: Minimizing Vascular Damage

Pradipkumar R. Atodaria
1   Atodaria Hair Transplant & Cosmetic Surgery Center, “Harsh-Deep,” Surat, Gujarat, India
,
Aniketh Venkataram
2   The Venkat Center for Skin ENT & Plastic Surgery, Vijayanagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Venkataram Mysore
2   The Venkat Center for Skin ENT & Plastic Surgery, Vijayanagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Kuldeepsinh P. Atodaria
1   Atodaria Hair Transplant & Cosmetic Surgery Center, “Harsh-Deep,” Surat, Gujarat, India
› Institutsangaben
Funding No funding has been obtained for this study.

Abstract

An often overlooked aspect of hair transplantation is the art of recipient site design and slit creation. There is also a lack of consensus on which technique provides the optimum coverage while minimizing vascular damage. This paper aims to provide logical arguments to determine the optimal instrument and method of slit creation, in order to ensure maximum density, optimal survival, minimal pop-out, and minimal damage to scalp vascularity.

The use of semiconical blades reduces the damage to the dermis and vascular plexus as compared with rectangular blades and needles, as the depth of penetration required is lower. The use of acute angle reduces the depth of penetration for the same length of slit and decreases damage to deep plexus. Coronal slits produce less vascular damage than that of sagittal slits with the same size blades.

We believe that these recommendations provide the optimum volume slits while causing minimal vascular damage.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Dezember 2021

© 2021. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Rose PT. Advances in hair restoration. Dermatol Clin 2018; 36 (01) 57-62
  • 2 Garg AK, Garg S. Donor harvesting: follicular unit excision. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2018; 11 (04) 195-201
  • 3 Sharma R, Ranjan A. Follicular unit extraction (FUE) hair transplant: curves ahead. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2019; 18 (04) 509-517
  • 4 Marwah MK, Mysore V. Recipient Area. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2018; 11 (04) 202-210
  • 5 Wells A. “Use of blades of 0.7 to 1mm in diameter and coronal incisions in hair transplantation: Surgical approach to improve density and natural results”. 2014
  • 6 Atodaria P. An innovative instrument for reducing the surgeon's time in making recipient sites. Hair Transplant Forum International 2014; 24 (04) 131-132
  • 7 Atodaria PR, Atodaria KP. Modifications of Multi Slit Knife for enhanced versatility in balding and vertex area hair transplant. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2020; 13 (03) 247-250
  • 8 Atodaria PR, Atodaria KP. Reducing surgical time: an innovative and versatile instrument for creating multiple brick-pattern sagittal recipient sites in a single stroke. Hair Transplant Forum International. 2020; 30 (05) 180-181
  • 9 Ginzburg A, Agrawal S. Alternate coronal and sagittal slits in recipient area of hair transplantation to ensure the correct graft implantation by assisting surgeon. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 83 (03) e189-e190
  • 10 Nakatsui T, Wong J, Groot D. Survival of densely packed follicular unit grafts using the lateral slit technique. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (08) 1016-1022 , discussion 1022–1025
  • 11 Cormia FE. Vasculature of the normal scalp. Arch Dermatol 1963; 88: 692-701
  • 12 Hori H, Moretti G, Rebora A, Crovato F. The thickness of human scalp: normal and bald. J Invest Dermatol 1972; 58 (06) 396-399