CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2022; 55(01): 031-035
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740080
Original Article

Mining the Twittersphere: Insights about Public Interest in Facial Reanimation Surgery from a Decade of Twitter Data

Hayeem L. Rudy
1   The Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States
,
Joseph A. Ricci
1   The Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background With 500 million tweets posted daily, Twitter can provide valuable insights about public discourse surrounding niche topics, such as facial paralysis surgery. This study aims to describe public interest on Twitter relating to facial paralysis and facial reanimation surgery over the last decade.

Methods Tweets containing the keywords “facial paralysis” and “Bell's palsy” posted between January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2019, were collected using Twitter Scraper. Tweets were screened by keywords relating to facial paralysis, and usage of these terms trended over time. Logistic regression was used to identify correlations between the quantity of publications per year and these terms posted on Twitter.

Results 32,880 tweets were made during the study period, with no significant difference in the number of tweets per year. A very strong (r = 0.8–1.0) positive correlation was found between time and frequency of the term “plastic surgery” and “transfer” (p < 0.05). A strong (r = 0.60–0.79) correlation was found between time and frequency for the following terms: “facial reanimation,” “gracilis,” “masseter,” “plastics,” “transplant” (p < 0.05). A total of 619 studies with the keyword “facial reanimation” were published in PubMed within the study period. A very strong, positive correlation between publications per year and frequency was found for the terms “plastic surgery,” “function” and “esthetic,” and a strong, positive correlation was found for the “plastics,” “transplant,” “Botox,” “surgery,” “cosmetic,” “aesthetic” and “injection” (p < 0.05).

Conclusions An increasing number of discussion about facial paralysis on Twitter correlates with increased publications and likely surgeon discourse on facial reanimation surgery, driving public interest.

Author Contributions

H.R. designed the project, collected data, and drafted the manuscript.


J.R. designed the project, drafted the manuscript, edited the manuscript, and provided project oversight.


Financial Disclosure Statement

The authors have no financial disclosures. This work was not supported by any external sources of funding.




Publication History

Article published online:
13 December 2021

© 2021. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Sorice SC, Li AY, Gilstrap J, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Social media and the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (05) 1047-1056
  • 2 Liu DZ. Commentary on: A primer on social media for plastic surgeons: What do i need to know about social media and how can it help my practice?. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (05) 620-621
  • 3 Rohrich RJ, Savetsky IL, Savetsky EB, Avashia YJ. Why social media is transforming plastic surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53 (01) 4-5
  • 4 Chandawarkar AA, Gould DJ, Stevens WG. Insta-grated plastic surgery residencies: the rise of social media use by trainees and responsible guidelines for use. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (10) 1145-1152
  • 5 Reissis D, Shiatis A, Nikkhah D. Advertising on social media: the plastic surgeon's prerogative. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (01) NP1-NP2
  • 6 Ben Naftali Y, Duek OS, Rafaeli S, Ullmann Y. Plastic surgery faces the web: Analysis of the popular social media for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (12) e1958
  • 7 Kadam D. Pandemic pause: a mixed blessing. Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53 (02) 169-170
  • 8 Chandawarkar AA, Gould DJ, Grant Stevens W. The top 100 social media influencers in plastic surgery on twitter: who should you be following?. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (08) 913-917
  • 9 Gray MC, Gemmiti A, Ata A. et al. Can you trust what you watch? An assessment of the quality of information in aesthetic surgery videos on YouTube. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 329e-336e
  • 10 Branford OA, Kamali P, Rohrich RJ. et al. #PlasticSurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 1354-1365
  • 11 Kalandar A, Al-Youha S, Al-Halabi B, Williams J. What does the public think? Examining plastic surgery perceptions through the twitterverse. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (01) 265-274
  • 12 Developer. Accessed June 8, 2020 at: https://developer.twitter.com/en
  • 13 Taspinar A. Twitter Scraper. Accessed May 24, 2021 at: https://github.com/taspinar/twitterscraper
  • 14 Millman KJ, Aivazis M. Python for scientists and engineers. Comput Sci Eng 2011; 13 (02) 9-12
  • 15 Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Nolan IT, Parham MJ, Nazerali R. Predicting public interest in nonsurgical cosmetic procedures using Google Trends. Aesthet Surg J 2019; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz264.
  • 16 Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Vail DG, Lee GK, Nazerali R. The Utility of Google Trends Data for Analyzing Public Interest in Breast Procedures. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (5S, Suppl 4) S325-S331
  • 17 Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Nolan IT, Vail DG, Lee GK, Nazerali R. Analysis and interpretation of Google Trends data on public interest in cosmetic body procedures. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (01) NP34-NP43
  • 18 Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Nolan IT, Vail DG, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Google Trends as a tool for evaluating public interest in facial cosmetic procedures. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (08) 908-918
  • 19 Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Nolan IT, Parham MJ, Richardson MT, Nazerali R. Celebrity influence affecting public interest in plastic surgery procedures: Google Trends analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (06) 1669-1680
  • 20 Whipple LA, Kotamarti VS, Heiman AJ, Patel A, Ricci JA. Using Google Trends to analyze patient search interest in implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction. Breast J 2019; 00: 1-3
  • 21 Chopan M, Sayadi L, Clark EM, Maguire K. Plastic surgery and social media: examining perceptions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (04) 1259-1265
  • 22 Demographics of Social Media Users and Adoption in the United States | Pew Research Center. Accessed April 13, 2020 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/#which-social-media-platforms-are-most-popular