Rofo 2016; 188(10): 940-948
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-110101
Interventional Radiology
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Retrograde Transpedal Access for Revascularization of Below-the-Knee Arteries in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia after an Unsuccessful Antegrade Transfemoral Approach

Retrograd transpedale Revaskularisierung kruraler Arterien bei Patienten mit kritischer Extremitätenischämie und gescheitertem antegraden Revaskularisierungsversuch
J. P. Goltz
1   Department for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
,
M. Planert
1   Department for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
,
M. Horn
2   Department for Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
,
M. Wiedner
2   Department for Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
,
M. Kleemann
2   Department for Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
,
J. Barkhausen
1   Department for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
,
E. Stahlberg
1   Department for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 February 2016

26 May 2016

Publication Date:
13 July 2016 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and technical and clinical success of endovascular below-the-knee (BTK) artery revascularization by a retrograde transpedal access.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 16/172 patients (9.3 %) with endovascular BTK revascularization in whom a transfemoral approach had failed and transpedal access had been attempted. The dorsal pedal (n = 13) or posterior tibial (n = 3) artery was accessed using a dedicated access set and ultrasound guidance. The procedure was finished in antegrade fashion by plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Comorbidities, vessel diameter and calcification at the access site were recorded. The analyzed outcomes were technical success, procedural complications, procedure time, crossing (guidewire beyond lesion and intra-luminal) and procedural (residual stenosis < 30 % after POBA) success, and limb salvage.

Results: Diabetes, coronary artery disease and hypertension were present in 15 patients (93.8 %), and both renal impairment and previous amputations in 7 (43.8 %). Pedal access vessel calcification was present in 5/16 patients (31.3 %). The mean diameter was 1.75 +/-0.24 mm. The procedure time was 92.4 +/-23 min. The success rate for achieving retrograde access was 100 %. Retrograde crossing was successful in 12/16 patients (75.0 %). Procedural success was observed in 10/16 patients (68.8 %). Minor complications occurred in 2/16 patients (12.5 %). The rate of limb salvage was 72.9 %, and the overall survival was 100 % at 12 months. Major amputations after revascularization occurred in 2/16 patients (12.5 %).

Conclusion: If an antegrade transfemoral approach to BTK lesions fails, a retrograde transpedal approach may nevertheless facilitate treatment. This approach appears to be safe and offers high technical and acceptable clinical success rates.

Key Points:

• Retrograde approaches via transpedal or transtibial vessels are safe and offer high technical success.

• One problem after technically successful puncture might be the re-entry following subintimal retrograde lesion crossing.

• After a failed attempt at antegrade revascularization of a BTK occlusion, a retrograde approach should be performed.

Citation Format:

• Goltz JP, Planert M, Horn M et al. Retrograde Transpedal Access for Revascularization of Below-the-Knee Arteries in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia after an Unsuccessful Antegrade Transfemoral Approach. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2016; 188: 940 – 948

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Evaluation der Sicherheit sowie technischem und klinischem Erfolg der endovaskulären Revaskularisierung kruraler Gefäßokklusionen über einen retrograd transpedalen Zugang.

Material und Methoden: Retrospektiv wurden 172 Patienten mit einer Unterschenkelrevaskularisierung zwischen 2/2014 und 8/2015 identifiziert. Bei 16/172 Patienten (9,3 %) war ein transfemoraler Rekanalisierungsversuch gescheitert und ein retrograd transpedaler Zugang unternommen worden. Unter sonografischer Führung wurden die A. dorsalis pedis (n = 13) oder die A. tibialis posterior unter Verwendung eines speziellen Sets punktiert. Die Prozedur wurde durch eine antegrade PTA beendet. Analysiert wurden Komorbiditäten sowie der Gefäßdurchmesser und -kalzifizierungsgrad des punktierten Gefäßes. Endpunkte waren technischer und prozeduraler Erfolg, periprozedurale Komplikationen, Prozedurzeit und Extremitätenerhalt.

Ergebnisse: Bei 15 Patienten (93,8 %) fanden sich jeweils Diabetes, KHK und Hypertonie unter den Komorbiditäten. Nierenfunktionseinschränkungen und stattgehabte Amputation fanden sich bei 7 Patienten (43,8 %). Bei 5/16 Patienten (31,3 %) bestand eine Kalzifizierung des punktierten Gefäßen, der mittlere Durchmesser betrug 1,75 +/-0,24 mm. Die Prozedurdauer betrug 92,4 +/-23 min. Der technische Erfolg betrug 100 %. Die retrograde Läsionspassage war bei 12/16 Patienten (75,0 %), die Gesamtprozedur bei 10/16 Patienten (68,8 %) erfolgreich. Minorkomplikationen kamen bei 2/16 Patienten (12,5 %) vor. Der Extremitätenerhalt, bzw. Überlebensrate nach 12 Monaten betrugen 72,9 % und 100 %. Majoramputationen nach der Revaskularisierung wurden bei 2/16 Patienten (12,5 %) durchgeführt.

Schlussfolgerung: Nach gescheitertem antegraden Revaskularisierungsversuch kann ein retrograd transpedaler Zugang den Prozedurerfolg ermöglichen. Die retrograde Punktion erscheint sicher und mit hoher technischer und akzeptabler klinischer Erfolgsrate vergesellschaftet zu sein.

Kernaussagen:

• Retrograd transpedale Gefäßzugänge erscheinen sicher und mit hoher technischer Erfolgsrate nutzbar zu sein

• Nach technisch erfolgreicher retrograder Punktion kann bei subintimaler Läsionpassage das Reentry problematisch sein

• Nach gescheitertem antegraden Revaskularisierungsversuch verspricht die retrograde transpedale Punktion Erfolg

 
  • References

  • 1 Bazan HA, Le L, Donovan M et al. Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 375-381
  • 2 Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: S5-S67
  • 3 Albers M, Romiti M, Brochado-Neto FC et al. Meta-analysis of popliteal-to-distal vein bypass grafts for critical ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 498-503
  • 4 Mewissen MW. Primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal disease. J Endovasc Ther 2009; 16: II63-II81
  • 5 Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Bansaghi Z et al. Transpedal access after failed anterograde recanalization of complex below-the-knee and femoropoliteal occlusions in critical limb ischemia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83: 997-1007
  • 6 Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1925-1934
  • 7 Goltz JP, Kleemann M. Complex recanalization techniques for complex femoro-popliteal lesions: how to optimize outcomes. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2015; 56: 31-41
  • 8 Ozawa N. A new understanding of chronic total occlusion from a novel PCI technique that involves a retrograde approach to the right coronary artery via a septal branch and passing of the guidewire to a guiding catheter on the other side of the lesion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 907-913
  • 9 Rogers RK, Dattilo PB, Garcia JA et al. Retrograde approach to recanalization of complex tibial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 915-925
  • 10 El-Sayed HF. Retrograde pedal/tibial artery access for treatment of infragenicular arterial occlusive disease. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2013; 9: 73-78
  • 11 Walker C. Pedal access in critical limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2014; 55: 225-227
  • 12 Bolia A, Miles KA, Brennan J et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of occlusions of the femoral and popliteal arteries by subintimal dissection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1990; 13: 357-363
  • 13 Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF et al. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: S199-S202
  • 14 Siracuse JJ, Menard MT, Eslami MH et al. Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 958-965
  • 15 Montero-Baker M, Schmidt A, Braunlich S et al. Retrograde approach for complex popliteal and tibioperoneal occlusions. J Endovasc Ther 2008; 15: 594-604
  • 16 Sethi S, Mohammad A, Ahmed SH et al. Recanalization of popliteal and infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions using Viance and CrossBoss crossing catheters: a multicenter experience from the XLPAD Registry. J Invasive Cardiol 2015; 27: 2-7
  • 17 Srivatsa SS, Edwards WD, Boos CM et al. Histologic correlates of angiographic chronic total coronary artery occlusions: influence of occlusion duration on neovascular channel patterns and intimal plaque composition. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 955-963
  • 18 Iyer SS, Dorros G, Zaitoun R et al. Retrograde recanalization of an occluded posterior tibial artery by using a posterior tibial cutdown: two case reports. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 20: 251-253
  • 19 Sabri SS, Hendricks N, Stone J et al. Retrograde pedal access technique for revascularization of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26: 29-38
  • 20 Mustapha JA, Saab F, McGoff T et al. Tibio-pedal arterial minimally invasive retrograde revascularization in patients with advanced peripheral vascular disease: the TAMI technique, original case series. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83: 987-994
  • 21 Schanzer A, Mega J, Meadows J et al. Risk stratification in critical limb ischemia: derivation and validation of a model to predict amputation-free survival using multicenter surgical outcomes data. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 1464-1471