Validation of Body Volume Acquisition by Using Elliptical Zone Method

C.-Y. Chiu; D. L. Pease; S. Fawkner; R. H. Sanders

doi:10.1055/s-0042-112589

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Table of Contents

Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(14): 1117-1123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112589

Physiology & Biochemistry

Validation of Body Volume Acquisition by Using Elliptical Zone Method

Authors

C.-Y. Chiu

¹Institute for Sport, Physical Education & Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
D. L. Pease

²Australian Institute of Sport, Movement Science, Canberra, Australia
S. Fawkner

³School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
R. H. Sanders

⁴Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

The elliptical zone method (E-Zone) can be used to obtain reliable body volume data including total body volume and segmental volumes with inexpensive and portable equipment. The purpose of this research was to assess the accuracy of body volume data obtained from E-Zone by comparing them with those acquired from the 3D photonic scanning method (3DPS). 17 male participants with diverse somatotypes were recruited. Each participant was scanned twice on the same day by a 3D whole-body scanner and photographed twice for the E-Zone analysis. The body volume data acquired from 3DPS was regarded as the reference against which the accuracy of the E-Zone was assessed. The relative technical error of measurement (TEM) of total body volume estimations was around 3% for E-Zone. E-Zone can estimate the segmental volumes of upper torso, lower torso, thigh, shank, upper arm and lower arm accurately (relative TEM<10%) but the accuracy for small segments including the neck, hand and foot were poor. In summary, E-Zone provides a reliable, inexpensive, portable, and simple method to obtain reasonable estimates of total body volume and to indicate segmental volume distribution.

Key words

body volume data - elliptical zone method - 3D photonic scanning - anthropometry

Full Text

References

References
1 Abe T, Yokozawa T, Takamatsu J, Enomoto Y, Okada H. Determination of body segment inertia parameters using 3D human body scanner and 3D CAD software. In International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Conference Proceedings Archive 2010; 1-2
2 Ackland T, Lohman T, Sundgot-Borgen J, Maughan R, Meyer N, Stewart A, Müller W. Current status of body composition assessment in sport. Sports Med 2012; 42: 227-249
3 Buys K, Van Deun D, De Laet T, Bruyninckx H. On-line generation of customized human models based on camera measurements. In International Symposium on Digital Human Modeling 2011
4 Carter JL, Heath BH. Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press; 1990
5 Chiou WK, Chen BH, Chou WY. The effects of landmarks and training on 3D surface anthropometric reliability and hip joint center prediction. In: Duffy VG. ed. Digital Human Modeling: Third International Conference, ICDHM 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA July 9–14, 2011 Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011: 3-11
6 Collins J. Volumetric analysis of human bodies. Adelaide: University of South Australia; 2006: 1-126
7 Daniell N, Olds T, Tomkinson G. Volumetric differences in body shape among adults with differing body mass index values: an analysis using three-dimensional body scans. Am J Hum Biol 2014; 26: 156-163
8 Deffeyes J, Sanders RH. Elliptical zone body segment modelling software: digitising, modelling and body segment parameter calculation. In: Wang Q. ed. ISBS Conference Proceedings. Beijing. China: The China Institute of Sports Science, Beijing; 2005: 749-752
9 Drillis R, Contini R, Bluestein M. Body segment parameters. Artif Limbs 1964; 8: 44-66
10 Durkin J, Dowling J. Body segment parameter estimation of the human lower leg using an elliptical model with validation from DEXA. Ann Biomed Eng 2006; 34: 1483-1493
11 Duthie G, Pyne D, Hooper S. Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union. Sports Med 2003; 33: 973-991
12 Guerrero-Romero F, Rodríguez-Morán M. Abdominal volume index. an anthropometry-based index for estimation of obesity is strongly related to impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res 2003; 34: 428-432
13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
14 Hume P, Marfell-Jones M. The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 1333-1340
15 Jensen RK. Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. J Biomech 1978; 11: 349-358
16 Katch V, Weltman A, Gold E. Validity of anthropometric measurements and the segment-zone method for estimating segmental and total body volume. Med Sci Sports 1974; 6: 271-276
17 Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Bradtmiller B, Daanen H, Li P, Nacher B, Nam Y. A protocol for evaluating the accuracy of 3D body scanners. Work 2012; 41: 4010-4017
18 Lee JJ, Freeland-Graves JH, Pepper MR, Yu W, Xu B. Efficacy of thigh volume ratios assessed via stereovision body imaging as a predictor of visceral adipose tissue measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Hum Biol 2015; 445-457
19 Lin Y-L, Wang M-JJ. Automated body feature extraction from 2D images. Expert Syst Appl 2011; 38: 2585-2591
20 Ma Y, Kwon J, Mao Z, Lee K, Li L, Chung H. Segment inertial parameters of Korean adults estimated from three-dimensional body laser scan data. Int J Ind Ergon 2011; 41: 19-29
21 Milsom J, Naughton R, O’Boyle A, Iqbal Z, Morgans R, Drust B, Morton JP. Body composition assessment of English Premier League soccer players: a comparative DXA analysis of first team, U21 and U18 squads. J Sports Sci 2015; 33: 1799-1806
22 Mulholland Y, Rolland C. Portable methods of body composition analysis. In: Stewart D, Sutton AL. eds. Body Composition in Sport, Exercise, and Health. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2012: 42-63
23 Muralidhara D. Come 2020!; Welcome body volume index!!; Bye bye body mass index!!!. Integr Obes Diabetes 2015; 1: 26-27
24 Okorodudu D, Jumean M, Montori V, Romero-Corral A, Somers V, Erwin P, Lopez-Jimenez F. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2010; 34: 791-799
25 Perini TA, Oliveira GLd, Ornellas JdS, Oliveira FPd. Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2005; 11: 81-85
26 Rolland C. Laboratory methods of body composition analysis. In: Stewart D, Sutton AL. eds. Body Composition in Sport, Exercise, and Health. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2012: 20-41
27 Sanders RH, Chiu C-Y, Gonjo T, Thow J, Oliveira N, Psycharakis SG, Payton CJ, McCabe CB. Reliability of the elliptical zone method of estimating body segment parameters of swimmers. J Sports Sci Med 2015; 14: 215-224
28 Schranz N, Tomkinson G, Olds T, Daniell N. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis: Differences between elite Australian rowers and the general population. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 459-469
29 Schranz N, Tomkinson G, Olds T, Petkov J, Hahn AG. Is three-dimensional anthropometric analysis as good as traditional anthropometric analysis in predicting junior rowing performance?. J Sports Sci 2012; 30: 1241-1248
30 Stewart AD, Klein S, Young J, Simpson S, Lee AJ, Harrild K, Crockett P, Benson PJ. Body image, shape, and volumetric assessments using 3D whole body laser scanning and 2D digital photography in females with a diagnosed eating disorder: Preliminary novel findings. Br J Psychol 2012; 103: 183-202
31 Treleaven P, Wells J. 3D body scanning and healthcare applications. Computer 2007; 40: 28-34
32 Wang J, Gallagher D, Thornton JC, Yu W, Horlick M, Pi-Sunyer FX. Validation of a 3-dimensional photonic scanner for the measurement of body volumes, dimensions, and percentage body fat. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 809-816
33 Wells JK. Three-dimensional (3-D) photonic scanning: a new approach to anthropometry. In: Preedy VR. ed. Handbook of Anthropometry. New York: Springer; 2012: 205-217
34 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group . Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Pædiatri Suppl 2006; 95: 38-46
35 Wicke J, Dumas GA, Costigan PA. A comparison between a new model and current models for estimating trunk segment inertial parameters. J Biomech 2009; 42: 55-60
36 World Health Organization . Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organisation Techical Report Series 1995; 854: 1-452
37 Zhang C, Chen T. Efficient feature extraction for 2D/3D objects in mesh representation. In: 2001. Thessaloniki, Greece: International Conference on Image Processing; 2001: 935-938