Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(14): 1117-1123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112589
Physiology & Biochemistry
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Validation of Body Volume Acquisition by Using Elliptical Zone Method

C.-Y. Chiu
1   Institute for Sport, Physical Education & Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
D. L. Pease
2   Australian Institute of Sport, Movement Science, Canberra, Australia
,
S. Fawkner
3   School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
R. H. Sanders
4   Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 01 July 2016

Publication Date:
27 September 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The elliptical zone method (E-Zone) can be used to obtain reliable body volume data including total body volume and segmental volumes with inexpensive and portable equipment. The purpose of this research was to assess the accuracy of body volume data obtained from E-Zone by comparing them with those acquired from the 3D photonic scanning method (3DPS). 17 male participants with diverse somatotypes were recruited. Each participant was scanned twice on the same day by a 3D whole-body scanner and photographed twice for the E-Zone analysis. The body volume data acquired from 3DPS was regarded as the reference against which the accuracy of the E-Zone was assessed. The relative technical error of measurement (TEM) of total body volume estimations was around 3% for E-Zone. E-Zone can estimate the segmental volumes of upper torso, lower torso, thigh, shank, upper arm and lower arm accurately (relative TEM<10%) but the accuracy for small segments including the neck, hand and foot were poor. In summary, E-Zone provides a reliable, inexpensive, portable, and simple method to obtain reasonable estimates of total body volume and to indicate segmental volume distribution.

Key words

body volume data - elliptical zone method - 3D photonic scanning - anthropometry
 

  • References

  • 1 Abe T, Yokozawa T, Takamatsu J, Enomoto Y, Okada H. Determination of body segment inertia parameters using 3D human body scanner and 3D CAD software. In International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports: Conference Proceedings Archive 2010; 1-2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ackland T, Lohman T, Sundgot-Borgen J, Maughan R, Meyer N, Stewart A, Müller W. Current status of body composition assessment in sport. Sports Med 2012; 42: 227-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Buys K, Van Deun D, De Laet T, Bruyninckx H. On-line generation of customized human models based on camera measurements. In International Symposium on Digital Human Modeling 2011
    PubMed
  • 4 Carter JL, Heath BH. Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Chiou WK, Chen BH, Chou WY. The effects of landmarks and training on 3D surface anthropometric reliability and hip joint center prediction. In: Duffy VG. ed. Digital Human Modeling: Third International Conference, ICDHM 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA July 9–14, 2011 Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011: 3-11
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Collins J. Volumetric analysis of human bodies. Adelaide: University of South Australia; 2006: 1-126
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Daniell N, Olds T, Tomkinson G. Volumetric differences in body shape among adults with differing body mass index values: an analysis using three-dimensional body scans. Am J Hum Biol 2014; 26: 156-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Deffeyes J, Sanders RH. Elliptical zone body segment modelling software: digitising, modelling and body segment parameter calculation. In: Wang Q. ed. ISBS Conference Proceedings. Beijing. China: The China Institute of Sports Science, Beijing; 2005: 749-752
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Drillis R, Contini R, Bluestein M. Body segment parameters. Artif Limbs 1964; 8: 44-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Durkin J, Dowling J. Body segment parameter estimation of the human lower leg using an elliptical model with validation from DEXA. Ann Biomed Eng 2006; 34: 1483-1493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Duthie G, Pyne D, Hooper S. Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union. Sports Med 2003; 33: 973-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Guerrero-Romero F, Rodríguez-Morán M. Abdominal volume index. an anthropometry-based index for estimation of obesity is strongly related to impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res 2003; 34: 428-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hume P, Marfell-Jones M. The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 1333-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jensen RK. Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. J Biomech 1978; 11: 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Katch V, Weltman A, Gold E. Validity of anthropometric measurements and the segment-zone method for estimating segmental and total body volume. Med Sci Sports 1974; 6: 271-276
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Bradtmiller B, Daanen H, Li P, Nacher B, Nam Y. A protocol for evaluating the accuracy of 3D body scanners. Work 2012; 41: 4010-4017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lee JJ, Freeland-Graves JH, Pepper MR, Yu W, Xu B. Efficacy of thigh volume ratios assessed via stereovision body imaging as a predictor of visceral adipose tissue measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Hum Biol 2015; DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22663. 445-457
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lin Y-L, Wang M-JJ. Automated body feature extraction from 2D images. Expert Syst Appl 2011; 38: 2585-2591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ma Y, Kwon J, Mao Z, Lee K, Li L, Chung H. Segment inertial parameters of Korean adults estimated from three-dimensional body laser scan data. Int J Ind Ergon 2011; 41: 19-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Milsom J, Naughton R, O’Boyle A, Iqbal Z, Morgans R, Drust B, Morton JP. Body composition assessment of English Premier League soccer players: a comparative DXA analysis of first team, U21 and U18 squads. J Sports Sci 2015; 33: 1799-1806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mulholland Y, Rolland C. Portable methods of body composition analysis. In: Stewart D, Sutton AL. eds. Body Composition in Sport, Exercise, and Health. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2012: 42-63
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Muralidhara D. Come 2020!; Welcome body volume index!!; Bye bye body mass index!!!. Integr Obes Diabetes 2015; 1: 26-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Okorodudu D, Jumean M, Montori V, Romero-Corral A, Somers V, Erwin P, Lopez-Jimenez F. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2010; 34: 791-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Perini TA, Oliveira GLd, Ornellas JdS, Oliveira FPd. Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2005; 11: 81-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rolland C. Laboratory methods of body composition analysis. In: Stewart D, Sutton AL. eds. Body Composition in Sport, Exercise, and Health. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2012: 20-41
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Sanders RH, Chiu C-Y, Gonjo T, Thow J, Oliveira N, Psycharakis SG, Payton CJ, McCabe CB. Reliability of the elliptical zone method of estimating body segment parameters of swimmers. J Sports Sci Med 2015; 14: 215-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schranz N, Tomkinson G, Olds T, Daniell N. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis: Differences between elite Australian rowers and the general population. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 459-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schranz N, Tomkinson G, Olds T, Petkov J, Hahn AG. Is three-dimensional anthropometric analysis as good as traditional anthropometric analysis in predicting junior rowing performance?. J Sports Sci 2012; 30: 1241-1248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Stewart AD, Klein S, Young J, Simpson S, Lee AJ, Harrild K, Crockett P, Benson PJ. Body image, shape, and volumetric assessments using 3D whole body laser scanning and 2D digital photography in females with a diagnosed eating disorder: Preliminary novel findings. Br J Psychol 2012; 103: 183-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Treleaven P, Wells J. 3D body scanning and healthcare applications. Computer 2007; 40: 28-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wang J, Gallagher D, Thornton JC, Yu W, Horlick M, Pi-Sunyer FX. Validation of a 3-dimensional photonic scanner for the measurement of body volumes, dimensions, and percentage body fat. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 809-816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wells JK. Three-dimensional (3-D) photonic scanning: a new approach to anthropometry. In: Preedy VR. ed. Handbook of Anthropometry. New York: Springer; 2012: 205-217
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group . Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Pædiatri Suppl 2006; 95: 38-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wicke J, Dumas GA, Costigan PA. A comparison between a new model and current models for estimating trunk segment inertial parameters. J Biomech 2009; 42: 55-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 World Health Organization . Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organisation Techical Report Series 1995; 854: 1-452
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Zhang C, Chen T. Efficient feature extraction for 2D/3D objects in mesh representation. In: 2001. Thessaloniki, Greece: International Conference on Image Processing; 2001: 935-938
    Google Scholar