PEEK – zahnmedizinische Grundlagen und Hintergründe

In medizinischen Anwendungen wird Polyetheretherketon (PEEK) als Material zur Bandscheibenstabilisierung oder für Hüftprothesen eingesetzt. Obwohl PEEK auch im dentalen Bereich seit längerer Zeit zur Verfügung steht und für die dentale Anwendung durchaus interessante Eigenschaften vorweisen kann, wurden bisher nur wenige wissenschaftliche Projekte und klinische Applikationen beschrieben. Prinzipiell kann man PEEK als temporäre Versorgung, Kronen und Brücken, für Teil- und Vollprothesen im Bereich des herausnehmbaren Zahnersatzes, für Splinte, Klammern, Implantate und Abutments sowie für festsitzenden Zahnersatz [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] verwenden.

• Literatur

• 1 Schwitalla A, Müller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39: 743-749
• 2 Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R et al. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 273-278
• 3 Meningaud JP, Spahn F, Donsimoni JM. After titanium, peek?. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2012; 113: 407-410
• 4 Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T et al. Polyetheretherketone – a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses?. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013; 101: 1209-1216
• 5 Santing HJ, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM et al. Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 882-889
• 6 Silla M, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Polyetherketonketon (PEKK) als Restaurationswerkstoff in der modernen Zahnmedizin: eine Literaturübersicht. Quintessenz Zahntech 2016; 42: 176-190
• 7 Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ et al. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012; 100: 1044-1052
• 8 Neumann EA, Villar CC, França FM. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Braz Oral Res 2014; 28
• 9 Williams DF, McNamara A. Potential of polyetherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinfroced PEEK in medical applications. J Mat Sci Let 1987; 6: 188-190
• 10 Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR et al. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 321-328
• 11 Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I et al. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 1377-1384
• 12 Wagner C, Stock V, Merk S et al. Retention Load of Telescopic Crowns with Different Taper Angles between Cobalt-Chromium and Polyetheretherketone Made with Three Different Manufacturing Processes Examined by Pull-Off Test. J Prosthodont 2016; [Epub ahead of print]
• 13 Bayer S, Komor N, Kramer A et al. Retention force of plastic clips on implant bars: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1377-1378
• 14 Rosentritt M, Rembs A, Behr M et al. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases. J Dent 2015; 43: 839-845
• 15 EN ISO 10139. Zahnheilkunde – Weichbleibende Unterfütterungswerkstoffe für Prothesen – Teil 2: Werkstoffe für Langzeitanwendungen. Beuth, Berlin 2009
• 16 Kolbeck C, Sereno N, Wood D et al. In-vitro-examination of molar crowns with substructures made of different polyetheretherketones. IADR/CED 2012; #664
• 17 Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J et al. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: Influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 7-12
• 18 Kolbeck C, Sereno N, Rosentritt M et al. In-vitro-examination of polyetheretherketone fixed partial dentures with different core designs. IADR 2013; #291
• 19 Kolbeck C, Sereno N, Wood D et al. In-vitro-examination of frameworks and veneered three-unit fixed-partial-dentures made of polyetheretherketone. IADR 2011; #515
• 20 Stawarczyk B, Bähr N, Beuer F et al. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 163-170
• 21 Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater 2012; 28: 1280-1283
• 22 Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M et al. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 739-744
• 23 Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N et al. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surface Sci 2012; 258: 7213-7218
• 24 Schiessl C, Schaefer L, Winter C et al. Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1179-1190
• 25 Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M et al. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 553-559
• 26 Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C et al. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1489-1497
• 27 Kolbeck C, Sereno N, Rosentritt M et al. Biofilm formation on polyetheretherketone surfaces and cleaning options. IADR 2013; #2353
• 28 Hahnel S, Wieser A, Lang R et al. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1297-1301
• 29 Rosentritt M, Kolbeck C. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen bei der Anwendung von PEEK im dentalen Bereich. Quintessenz Zahntech 2015; 41: 14-22