Computergestützte Untersuchung kombinierter LWS-Bewegungen und ihre manualtherapeutische Relevanz: Ein Fallbericht

Zusammenfassung

Anhand zweier Fallbeispiele untersuchten Aubrey Monie und sein Team aus Perth (West Australien) den Nutzen einer computergestützten kombinierten Bewegungsuntersuchung – Combined Movement Examination (CME). Die Auswertung der CME lieferte objektive Daten zur Beweglichkeit der Patienten, gab in beiden Fällen einen Hinweis auf die Therapierichtung und diente zur Überprüfung der Intervention.

• Literatur

• 1 Barrett CJ, Singer KP, Day R. Assessment of combined movements of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic and low back pain subjects using a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system. Manual Therapy 1999; 4: 94-99
• 2 Bogduk N. The innervation of the vertebral column. The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1985; 31
• 3 Brown L. An introduction to the treatment and examination of the spine by combined movements. Physiotherapy 1988; 74: 347-353
• 4 Cunningham H, Little JP, Pearcy MJ. et al. The effect of soft tissue properties on overall biomechanical response of a human lumbar motion segment: A preliminary finite element study. In: Brebbia CA. (Hrsg.) Modelling in Medicine and Biology VII. WIT Press; 2007: 93-102
• 5 Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ. et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23: 2003-2013
• 6 Edgar MA. The nerve supply of the lumbar intervertebral disc. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2007; 89B: 1135-1139
• 7 Edwards B. Combined movements of the lumbar spine: Examination and clinical significance. Aust J Physiother 1979; 25: 147-152
• 8 Edwards BC. Manual of combined movements: Their use in the examination and treatment of musculoskeletal vertebral column disorders. 2. Aufl. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999
• 9 Groen GJ, Stolker RJ. Thoracic neural anatomy. In: Giles L, Singer KP. (Hrsg.) Clinical Anatomy and Management of Thoracic Spine Pain. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000: 114-41
• 10 Ha TH, Saber-Sheikh K, Moore AP. et al. Measurement of lumbar spine range of movement and coupled motion using inertial sensors – a protocol validity study. Manual Therapy 2013; 18: 87-91
• 11 Hunter G. Specific soft tissue mobilization in the management of soft tissue dysfunction. Manual Therapy 1998; 3: 2-11
• 12 Laird R, Gilbert J, Kent P. et al. Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014; 15: 229
• 13 Laplante BL, Ketchum JM, Saullo TR. et al. Multivariable Analysis of the Relationship Between Pain Referral Patterns and the Source of Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Physician 2012; 15: 171-178
• 14 Little JP, Pearcy MJ, Adam CJ. Coupled rotations in the lumbar spine – are these a consequence of passive spinal anatomy?. In: Brebbia CA. (Hrsg.) Modelling in Medicine and Biology VII. WIT Press; 2007. pp. 83-92
• 15 Lyle MA, Manes S, McGuinness M. et al. Relationship of physical examination findings and self-reported symptom severity and physical function in patients with degenerative lumbar conditions. Physical Therapy 2005; 85: 120-133
• 16 Maitland GD. Vertebral manipulation. 5. Aufl. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997
• 17 Monie AP, Price RI, Singer KP. Assessing the clinical utility of Combined Movement Examination in symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Clinical Biomechanics 2015; 30: 558-64
• 18 Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P. et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain – towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 2008; 33: 90-94
• 19 Pearcy MJ, Hindle RJ. New method for the non-invasive 3-dimensional measurement of human back movement. Clinical Biomechanics 1989; 4: 73-79
• 20 Tarulli AW, Raynor EM. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurologic Clinics 2007; 25: 387-405
• 21 Williams JM, Haq I, Lee RY. A novel approach to the clinical evaluation of differential kinematics of the lumbar spine. Manua Therapy 2013; 18: 130-135