Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2017; 142(02): e10-e19
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-121346
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Eine pneumologische Rehabilitation nach akuter Exazerbation der COPD senkt die Rate erneuter Exazerbationen

Pulmonary Rehabilitation after Acute Exacerbation of COPD Reduces the Rate of Reexacerbations
Marc Spielmanns   *
1   Medizinischen Klinik und ambulante pneumologische Rehabilitation in Leverkusen (APRiL), Remigius-Krankenhaus, Leverkusen Opladen
4   Lehrstuhl Pneumologie, Universität Witten/Herdecke
,
Andrea Meier   *
1   Medizinischen Klinik und ambulante pneumologische Rehabilitation in Leverkusen (APRiL), Remigius-Krankenhaus, Leverkusen Opladen
,
Aurelia Winkler
1   Medizinischen Klinik und ambulante pneumologische Rehabilitation in Leverkusen (APRiL), Remigius-Krankenhaus, Leverkusen Opladen
,
Rainer Glöckl
6   Abteilung Pneumologie, Allergologie, Schlaf- und Beatmungsmedizin, Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land, Schönau am Königssee
7   Abteilung für Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sportmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), München
,
Christoph Nell
5   Philipps Universität Marburg, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie und Intensivmedizin
,
Andreas Rembert Koczulla
5   Philipps Universität Marburg, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie und Intensivmedizin
,
Tobias Boeselt
5   Philipps Universität Marburg, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie und Intensivmedizin
,
Peter Alter
5   Philipps Universität Marburg, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie und Intensivmedizin
,
Friederike Magnet
3   Abteilung Pneumologie, Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Köln
4   Lehrstuhl Pneumologie, Universität Witten/Herdecke
,
Jan Hendrik Storre
2   Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
3   Abteilung Pneumologie, Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Köln
,
Wolfram Windisch
3   Abteilung Pneumologie, Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Köln
4   Lehrstuhl Pneumologie, Universität Witten/Herdecke
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 January 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Die akute Exazerbation einer COPD (AECOPD) stellt für die Patienten ein erhebliches Risiko dar und ist für die Prognose mitentscheidend. Bisherige Ergebnisse über die Auswirkungen einer pneumologischen Rehabilitation (PR) auf die Exazerbationsfrequenz nach AECOPD sind uneinheitlich. Es wurde eine prospektive, fallkontrollierte Studie mit dem Ziel durchgeführt, den Einfluss der PR auf die Exazerbationsfrequenz nach AECOPD zu messen.

Patienten und Methoden Eine PR wurde bei 57 COPD-Patienten nach AECOPD durchgeführt. Davon konnten 30 nach einem Jahr nachuntersucht werden und wurden mit 32 Kontrollpatienten (KG = hospitalisiert wegen AECOPD ohne PR) verglichen. Die Anzahl der Exazerbationen wurde innerhalb der Gruppen und zwischen den Gruppen analysiert. Registrierung: DRKS Nr. 00 006 847.

Ergebnisse Im Intragruppenvergleich war die Exazerbationsrate in der PR-Gruppe im Jahr nach der Rehabilitation signifikant niedriger (0,97 ± 1,52 vs. 2,67±1,12; p < 0,001). Ebenfalls signifikant niedriger zeigte sich die Anzahl der Exazerbationen im Intergruppenvergleich nach einem Jahr in der PR-Gruppe vs. KG-Gruppe (0,97 ± 1,52 vs 2,16 ± 1,25; p < 0,001).

Schlussfolgerung Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass durch die PR im Untersuchungszeitraum von einem Jahr die Exazerabationsrate nach AECOPD im Vergleich prä/post und im Intergruppenvergleich zur KG-Gruppe signifikant gesenkt werden konnte. Weitere prospektive Studien, die den Stellenwert der PR nach AECOPD untersuchen, sind erforderlich.

Abstract

Objective Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) provides for patients a significant hazard and is crucial for the prognosis. Data on the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on the frequency of reexacerbations after AECOPD are inconsistent. A prospective, case-control study was conducted with the aim of measuring the impact of PR on the frequency of reexacerbations after AECOPD.

Patients and Methods A PR was performed in 57 patients with COPD after AECOPD. 30 participants were followed-up after one year and compared to 32 Control-Group (KG = hospitalized for AECOPD without PR). The rate of reexacerbations was both retrospectively in the year preceding the AECOPD, and prospectively in the year after AECOPD analyzed within groups and between groups.

Results In the intra group comparison the exacerbation rate was significantly lower in the PR-group in the year after rehabilitation (0.97 ± 2.67 vs. 1.52 ± 1.12; p < 0.001). The intergroup comparison also showed a significantly lower number of exacerbations for the PR-group (0.97 ± 1.52 vs 2.16 ± 1.25; p < 0.001).

Conclusion It was shown that the exacerbation rate after an AECOPD could be significantly reduced in the PR-group in comparison to the KG-group during the investigation period of one year by PR. More prospective studies are required to define the value of PR in the context of AECOPD.

Schlüsselwörter

pneumologische Rehabilitation - COPD - SGRQ - CAT - HADS - Exazerbation

Key words

pulmonary rehabilitation - COPD - SGRQ - CAT - HADS - exacerbation

* M. Spielmanns und A. Meier sind gleichberechtigte Erstautoren


Extended Abstract

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Burney P. Jithoo A. Kato B. et al. Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) Study. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mortality and prevalence: the associations with smoking and poverty – a BOLD analysis. Thorax 2014; 69: 465-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Teo WS. Tan WS. Chong WF. et al. Economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology 2012; 17: 120-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wacker ME. Jörres RA. Schulz H. et al. Direct and indirect costs of COPD and its comorbidities: Results from the German COSYCONET study. Respir Med 2015; 111: 39-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Medical Research Council. Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum no. 45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1976
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Price LC. Lowe D. et al. UK national COPD Audit 2003: impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute COPD exacerabtion. Thorax 2006; 61: 837-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Garcia-Aymerich J. Farrero E. Felez MA. et al. Risk factors of readmission to hospital for a COPD exacerbation: a prospective study. Thorax 2003; 58: 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Seemungal TA. Donaldson GC. Bhowmik A. et al. Time course and recovery of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 1608-1613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Spencer S. Jones PW. Time course of recovery of health status following an infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Thorax 2003; 58: 589-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bourbeau J. Activities of life: the COPD patient. COPD 2009; 6: 192-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Marchetti N. Criner GJ. Albert RK. Preventing acute exacerbations and hospital admissions in COPD. Chest 2013; 143: 1444-1454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Spruit MA. Singh SJ. Garvey C. et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Key Concepts and Advances in Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: e13-e64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Puhan MA. Gimeno-Santos E. Scharplatz M. et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2011; 10 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005305.pub3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Van Ranst D. Stoop WA. Meijer JW. et al. Reduction of exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD after participation in a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2014; 9: 1059-1067
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Griffiths TL. Burr ML. Campbell IA. et al. Resultat at 1 year of outpatient multidisciplinary pulmonar rehabilitaion: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 362-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Revitt O. Sewell L. Morgan MDL. et al. Short outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme reduces readmission following a hospitalization for an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology 2013; 18: 1063-1068
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ringbæk T. Green A. Laursen LC. et al. Effect of tele health care on exacerbations and hospital admissions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015; 10: 1801-1808
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Greening NJ. Williams JE. Hussain SF. et al. An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2014; 349: g4315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ko FW. Dai DL. Ngai J. et al. Effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation on health care utilization and health status in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbations of COPD. Respirology 2011; 16: 617-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Spielmanns M. Winkler A. Preignitz C. et al. Preliminary Short-term Results of an All-day Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in an Acute Hospital on Patients with Mild to Very Severe COPD. Rehabilitation 2015; 54: 304-309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 GOLD. Global Strategy of the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Update 2015. available at www.goldcopd.org
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Decramer M. Nici L. Nardini S. et al. Targeting the COPD exacerbation. Respir Med 2008; 102: S3-S15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wanger J. Clausen JL. Coates A. et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Miller MR. Hankinson J. Brusasco V. et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Quanjer PH. Tammeling GJ. Cotes JE. et al. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993; 16: 5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 ATS/ERS. Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 518-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS-statement, guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 111-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jones PW. Quirk FH. Baveystock CM. et al. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145: 1321-1327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Medical Research Council. Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum no. 45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1976
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jones PW. Harding G. Berry P. et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 648-654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kon SS. Canavan JL. Jones SE. et al. Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 195-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bjelland I. Dahl AA. Haug TT. et al. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52: 69-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chapman KR. Bergeron C. Bhutani M. et al. Do we know the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for COPD exacerbations?. COPD 2013; 10: 243-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rochester CL. Spanevello A. Heterogeneity of pulmonary rehabilitation: like apples and oranges – both healthy fruit. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1223-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Spruit MA. Pitta F. Garvey C. et al. Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1326-1337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pitta F. Troosters T. Probst VS. et al. Physical activity and hospitalization for exacerbation of COPD. Chest 2006; 129: 536-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Donaldson GC. Wilkinson TM. Hurst JR. et al. Exacerbations and time spent outdoors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 446-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. Clearing the air: a national study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation. Rahmenempfehlungen zur ambulanten pneumologischen Rehabilitation 2008 Verfügbar unter. www.bar-frankfurt.de
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Glaab T. Vogelmeier C. Buhl K. Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations. Respi Res 2010; 11: 79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mei H. Sue Y. Lemin W. et al. Efficiency and Safety of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Med Sci Monit 2015; 21: 806-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Deepak TH. Mohapatra PR. Janmeja AK. et al. Outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2014; 56: 7-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lewko A. Bidgood PL. Jewell A. et al. Evaluation of multidimensional COPD-related subjective fatigue following a pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Respir Med 2014; 108: 95-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Lewko A. Bidgood PL. Garrod R. Evaluation of psychological and physiological predictors of fatigue in patients with COPD. BMC Pulm Med 2009; 9: 47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Breslin E. Van der SC. Breukink S. et al. Perception of fatigue and quality of life in patients with COPD. Chest 1998; 114: 958-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Harrison SL. Greening NJ. Williams JE. et al. Have we underestimated the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in improving mood?. Respir Med 2012; 106: 838-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Puhan M. Frey M. Büchi S. et al. The minimal improtant difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hogg L. Garrod R. Thornton H. et al. Effectiveness, attendance, and completion of an integrated, system-wide pulmonary rehabilitation service for COPD: prospective observational study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2012; 9: 546-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Martinez Rivera C. Costan Galicia J. Alcázar Navarrete B. et al. Factors Associated with Depression in COPD: A Multicenter Study. Lung 2016; 194: 335-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Emtner M. Wadell K. Effects of exercise training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – a narrative review for FYSS (Swedish Physical Activity Exercise Prescription Book). Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 368-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Casaburi R. Kukafka D. Cooper CB. et al. Improvement in exercise tolerance with the combination of tiotropium and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest 2005; 127: 809-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar