Funktionsdiagnostik in der Gastroenterologie

Insbesondere unspezifische gastrointestinale Symptome lassen sich mit den klinischen Untersuchungstechniken wie Endoskopie und Sonografie oft nicht befriedigend abklären. Hier hilft die gastrointestinale Funktionsdiagnostik Störungen aufzuspüren und die zugrunde liegenden pathophysiologischen Ursachen einzugrenzen. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die gebräuchlichsten Verfahren – ihre Möglichkeiten, praktische Durchführung und Grenzen.

• Literatur

• 1 Hannig C, Wuttge-Hannig A, Hess U. Roentgen cinematography assessment of normal values of pharyngeal motility as a principle in diagnosis of pathologic changes. Rontgenpraxis 1998; 51: 141-149
• 2 Merati AL. In-office evaluation of swallowing: FEES, pharyngeal squeeze maneuver, and FEESST. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013; 46: 31-39
• 3 Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P. Global Consensus Group. et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900-1920
• 4 Chan WW, Haroian LR, Gyawali CP. Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2943-2949
• 5 Koop H, Fuchs KH, Labenz J. et al. S2k guideline: gastroesophageal reflux disease guided by the German Society of Gastroenterology: AWMF register no. 021-013. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 1299-1346
• 6 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 160-174
• 7 Zerbib F, Roman S, Bruley Des Varannes S. Groupe Français De Neuro-Gastroentérologie. et al. Normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal 24-hour pH impedance in individuals on and off therapy and interobserver reproducibility. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 366-372
• 8 Hirano I, Richter JE. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 668-685
• 9 Zerbib F, Belhocine K, Simon M. et al. Clinical, but not oesophageal pH-impedance, profiles predict response to proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 2012; 61: 501-506
• 10 Frazzoni M, Savarino E, de Bortoli N. et al. Analyses of the post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance parameters increase the diagnostic yield of impedance-ph monitoring of patients with reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 40-46
• 11 Martinucci I, de Bortoli N, Savarino E. et al. Esophageal baseline impedance levels in patients with pathophysiological characteristics of functional heartburn. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 546-555
• 12 Becker V, Graf S, Schlag C. et al. First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1096-1101
• 13 Wilhelm D, Jell A, Feussner H. et al. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in gastrectomy patients – what do we really measure?. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 541-545
• 14 Altman KW, Haines 3rd GK, Hammer ND. et al. The H+/K+-ATPase (proton) pump is expressed in human laryngeal submucosal glands. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1927-1930
• 15 Pace F, Sangaletti O, Pallotta S. et al. Biliary reflux and non-acid reflux are two distinct phenomena: a comparison between 24-hour multichannel intraesophageal impedance and bilirubin monitoring. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 1031-1039
• 16 Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Hirano I. et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 272-278
• 17 Chen JW, Pandolfino JE, Lin Z. et al. Severity of endoscopically identified esophageal rings correlates with reduced esophageal distensibility in eosinophilic esophagitis. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 794-801
• 18 Fischbach W, Malfertheiner P, Lynen Jansen P. et al. S2k-Leitlinien Helicobacter pylori und gastroduodenale Ulkuskrankheit. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54: 327-363
• 19 Keller J, Wedel T, Seidl H. et al. S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM) zu Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie intestinaler Motilitätsstörungen. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 374-390
• 20 Andresen V, Enck P, Frieling T. et al. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM); Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS). S2k guideline for chronic constipation: definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 651-672
• 21 Dinning PG, Carrington EV, Scott SM. Colonic and anorectal motility testing in the high-resolution era. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2016; 32: 44-48
• 22 Keller J, Franke A, Storr M. et al. Clinically relevant breath tests in gastroenterological diagnostics – recommendations of the German Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility as well as the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases. Z Gastroenterol 2005; 43: 1071-1090
• 23 Pohl D, Savarino E, Hersberger M. et al. Excellent agreement between genetic and hydrogen breath tests for lactase deficiency and the role of extended symptom assessment. Br J Nutr 2010; 104: 900-907
• 24 Houben E, De Preter V, Billen J. et al. Additional value of CH4 measurement in a combined (13)C/H2 lactose malabsorption breath test: a retrospective analysis. Nutrients 2015; 7: 7469-7485
• 25 Parthasarathy G, Chen J, Chen X. et al. Relationship between microbiota of the colonic mucosa vs feces and symptoms, colonic transit, and methane production in female patients with chronic constipation. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 367-379.e1
• 26 Hoffmeister A, Mayerle J, Beglinger C. et al. S3-Consensus guidelines on definition, etiology, diagnosis and medical, endoscopic and surgical management of chronic pancreatitis German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS). Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 1176-1224
• 27 Watson RR, Klapman J, Komanduri S. et al. Wide disparities in attitudes and practices regarding Type II sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a survey of expert U.S. endoscopists. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E941-946