Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2022; 50(01): e3-e11
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742690
Original Article | Artículo Original

Arthroscopically-Assisted Foveal Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex: Anchor Fixation versus Trans Osseous Tunnel – A Comparative Study

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | español
1   Hand and Microsurgery Team, Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
3   Hand Team, Clínica Indisa, Santiago, Chile
,
4   Hospital Mutual de Seguridad, Talca, Chile
5   Hand and Microsurgery Team, Hospital Regional de Talca, Chile
,
1   Hand and Microsurgery Team, Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
6   Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana – Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
,
7   Emergency Department, Hospital Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
,
4   Hospital Mutual de Seguridad, Talca, Chile
5   Hand and Microsurgery Team, Hospital Regional de Talca, Chile
,
8   Shoulder Team, Departament of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Introduction The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) plays a fundamental role in the stability of the wrist, and its foveal insertion is the primary structure that performs this function. Surgical repair of the CFCT is challenging given the complexity of the anatomical structures, and arthroscopically-assisted reinsertion has shown certain benefits. The most commonly used techniques are reinsertion with anchors (RAs) and transosseous tunnels (TOs).

Objective To compare the functional results of patients with acute foveal lesion of the CFCT operated through RAs versus TOs, both with arthroscopic assistance.

Materials and methods A retrospective, observational study of patients operated on for foveal disinsertion of the TFCC. We included patients older than 18 years of age, with a traumatic history and conservative treatment lsting 3 months, with persistent pain and arthro-computed tomography (arthroCT) compatible with foveal disinsertion of the TFCC. Patients treated with the RA technique versus TOs were compared, both with arthroscopic assistance. The variables studied were pain during load according to the visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo score, and ranges of motion of the wrist. Values of p <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results We included 24 patients (11 in the RAs group and 13 in the TOs group) With an average age of 28.5 years, 58% of whom were male, without statistically significant differences between the groups. In the whole sample, a decrease in pain of 4.33 points (standard deviation [SD]: 1.16) on the VAS was found, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.98). The Mayo score improved in both groups, with an average of 30.09 points (SD: 0.94) in the RAs group, and 31.92 points (SD: 1.32) in the TOs group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0004). Flexion-extension increased by 5.2° (SD: 2.3°) in the RAs group, and by 6.9° (SD: 1.32°) in the TOs group, and this difference was also statistically significant (p = 0.01). Pronation improved by 15.9° (SD: 1.7°) in the RAs group, and by 15.8° (SD: 1.72°) in the TOs group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.46), and supination improved by 17.09° (SD: 2.46°) in the RAs group, and by 17.5° (SD: 1.61°) in the TOs group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.004).

The mean duration of ischemia was of 34.2 minutes (SD: 4.36 minutes) in the TOs group, and of 78.9 minutes (SD: 9.39 minutes) in the RAs group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.000).

Discussion In the surgery for foveal reinsertion of the TFCC, both the techniques with anchors and with TOs, are effective in reducing load-bearing pain, improving the ranges of motion of the joints and the functional score. Although we found statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the Mayo score, flexion-extension and supination, these do not exceed the minimally-significant clinical differences.

Conclusion Both techniques are effective in reducing weight bearing pain and improving function and range of motion of the wrist. TO surgery has a significantly shorter ischemia time than RA surgery.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Mai 2021

Angenommen: 25. Oktober 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Juni 2022

© 2022. SECMA Foundation. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil