Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744276
Physiological Significance of Myocardial Bridging by Fractional Flow Reserve—An Observational Study

Abstract
Background Myocardial bridge (MB) is a portion of an epicardial coronary artery that takes an intramuscular course. The systolic compression of MB often gets carried over to early and mid-diastole, compromising coronary blood flow. In clinical practice, we encounter patients with angina, non-invasive evidence of ischemia, and a MB as the only relevant finding on angiography. In view of studies in support of decreased coronary flow reserve in MB, we assessed the physiological significance of MB by fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Methods and Results We enrolled eight patients with chronic stable angina and positive noninvasive stress test, who had no significant CAD, and with evidence of MB in the left anterior descending artery. Mean age of population was 57.14 ± 6.25 years. Two (25%) were females and six (75%) were males. Four (50%) were smokers, five (62.5%) were diabetics, and two (25%) were hypertensives. Mean length of MB is 19.4 ± 5.04 mm. All underwent physiological assessment by FFR and the baseline, post nitroglycerin (NTG), and post adenosine readings were noted. Mean pre-NTG value, post-NTG, and post-adenosine were 0.974 ± 0.022, 0.96 ± 0.03, and 0.88 ± 0.042 (≤0.80 hemodynamically significant) respectively. Paired t-test showed significant reduction in FFR after NTG (p = 0.0452) and post-adenosine (p = 0.011) but all eight patients did not get significant FFR.
Conclusion MB was found to be physiologically insignificant in our group of patients. But a statistical significant reduction of FFR in MB, post NTG and post adenosine, does impress on the fact that, an extensive study over a longer period of course, could throw light on this unsettled area of physiological significance and optimal therapeutic approach.
Keywords
myocardial bridging - fractional flow reserve - treadmill test - non invasive stress imagingPublication History
Article published online:
18 April 2022
© 2022. Women in Cardiology and Related Sciences. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Reyman HC. Disertatio de vasis cordis propriis. Bibl Anat 1737; 2: 359-379
- 2 Hostiuc S, Negoi I, Rusu MC, Hostiuc M. Myocardial bridging: a meta-analysis of prevalence. J Forensic Sci 2018; 63 (04) 1176-1185
- 3 Roberts W, Charles SM, Ang C. et al. Myocardial bridges: a meta-analysis. Clin Anat 2021; 34 (05) 685-709
- 4 Konen E, Goitein O, Sternik L, Eshet Y, Shemesh J, Di Segni E. The prevalence and anatomical patterns of intramuscular coronary arteries: a coronary computed tomography angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49 (05) 587-593
- 5 Möhlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, Erbel R. Update on myocardial bridging. Circulation 2002; 106 (20) 2616-2622
- 6 Rajendran R, Hegde M. The prevalence of myocardial bridging on multidetector computed tomography and its relation to coronary plaques. Pol J Radiol 2019; 84: e478-e483
- 7 Klues HG, Schwarz ER, vom Dahl J. et al. Disturbed intracoronary hemodynamics in myocardial bridging: early normalization by intracoronary stent placement. Circulation 1997; 96 (09) 2905-2913
- 8 Bernhard S, Möhlenkamp S, Tilgner A. Transient integral boundary layer method to calculate the translesional pressure drop and the fractional flow reserve in myocardial bridges. Biomed Eng Online 2006; 5: 42
- 9 Ge J, Jeremias A, Rupp A. et al. New signs characteristic of myocardial bridging demonstrated by intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler. Eur Heart J 1999; 20 (23) 1707-1716
- 10 Rossi L, Dander B, Nidasio GP. et al. Myocardial bridges and ischemic heart disease. Eur Heart J 1980; 1 (04) 239-245
- 11 Yano K, Yoshino H, Taniuchi M. et al. Myocardial bridging of the LAD in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24: 202-208
- 12 Marchionni N, Chechi T, Falai M, Margheri M, Fumagalli S. Myocardial stunning associated with a myocardial bridge. Int J Cardiol 2002; 82 (01) 65-67
- 13 Feld H, Guadanino V, Hollander G, Greengart A, Lichstein E, Shani J. Exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia in association with a myocardial bridge. Chest 1991; 99 (05) 1295-1296
- 14 Verhagen SN, Rutten A, Meijs MF. et al. Relationship between myocardial bridges and reduced coronary atherosclerosis in patients with angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167 (03) 883-888
- 15 Nishimiya K, Matsumoto Y, Wang H. et al. Absence of adventitial vasa vasorum formation at the coronary segment with myocardial bridge—an optical coherence tomography study. Int J Cardiol 2018; 250: 275-277
- 16 Alsoufi B. Do not miss the bridge. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156 (04) 1627-1628
- 17 Hongo Y, Tada H, Ito K, Yasumura Y, Miyatake K, Yamagishi M. Augmentation of vessel squeezing at coronary-myocardial bridge by nitroglycerin: study by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J 1999; 138 (2 Pt 1): 345-350
- 18 Yu Y, Yu L, Dai X, Zhang J. CT fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis of myocardial bridging-related ischemia: a study using dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging as a reference standard. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22 (12) 1964-1973
- 19 Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A. et al. Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7 (03) 267-277
- 20 Yamada R, Tremmel JA, Tanaka S. et al. Functional versus anatomic assessment of myocardial bridging by intravascular ultrasound: impact of arterial compression on proximal atherosclerotic plaque. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5 (04) e001735
- 21 Ye Z, Lai Y, Yao Y, Mintz GS, Liu X. Optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound assessment of the anatomic size and wall thickness of a muscle bridge segment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 93 (S1): 772-778
- 22 Schwarz ER, Gupta R, Haager PK. et al. Myocardial bridging in absence of coronary artery disease: proposal of a new classification based on clinical-angiographic data and long-term follow-up. Cardiology 2009; 112 (01) 13-21
- 23 Escaned J, Cortés J, Flores A. et al. Importance of diastolic fractional flow reserve and dobutamine challenge in physiologic assessment of myocardial bridging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42 (02) 226-233
- 24 Aleksandric SB, Djordjevic-Dikic AD, Dobric MR. et al. Functional assessment of myocardial bridging with conventional and diastolic fractional flow reserve: vasodilator versus inotropic provocation. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10 (13) e020597
- 25 Tarantini G, Barioli A, Nai Fovino L. et al. Unmasking myocardial bridge-related ischemia by intracoronary functional evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11 (06) e006247