Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748979
Summary of Bifurcation Stenting Strategies and Outcomes in Women
Funding None.
Abstract
Several studies have examined the efficacy of drug-eluting stents in acute and chronic coronary syndromes and demonstrated benefit in both men and women. However, the effect of gender on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in more complex disease including bifurcation disease is less well-known. In particular, a two-stent or provisional strategy, for both left Main and non-Left Main bifurcation lesions, has been variable across the different studies. In addition, there is a notable geographic preference whereby a stepwise provisional strategy with culotte as a bailout technique is preferred in Europe while in Asia there is a predilection to DK Crush for a 2-stent strategy. Many of these trials, however, are underpowered to conduct subgroup analysis for outcomes in women. To date, the evidence suggests women have better outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting in complex disease. The higher events in women undergoing PCI are largely driven by bleeding. Studies dedicated to evaluating outcomes after complex revascularization in women are desperately needed with long-term follow-up. This review examines the current landmark trials as they pertain to outcomes in women.
Publication History
Article published online:
29 July 2022
© 2022. Women in Cardiology and Related Sciences. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Lansky AJ, Costa RA, Mooney M. et al; TAXUS-IV Investigators. Gender-based outcomes after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45 (08) 1180-1185
- 2 Solinas E, Nikolsky E, Lansky AJ. et al. Gender-specific outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50 (22) 2111-2116
- 3 Mikhail GW, Gerber RT, Cox DA. et al. Influence of sex on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with the paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent: results of the “TAXUS Woman” analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3 (12) 1250-1259
- 4 Morice MC, Mikhail GW, Mauri i Ferré F. et al. SPIRIT Women, evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent system in female patients: referral time for coronary intervention and 2-year clinical outcomes. EuroIntervention 2012; 8 (03) 325-335
- 5 Giustino G, Baber U, Aquino M. et al. Safety and efficacy of new-generation drug-eluting stents in women undergoing complex percutaneous coronary artery revascularization: from the WIN-DES collaborative patient-level pooled analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9 (07) 674-684
- 6 Nicolas J, Claessen BE, Cao D. et al. A sex paradox in clinical outcomes following complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 2021; 329: 67-73
- 7 Osman M, Ghaffar YA, Osman K. et al. Gender-based outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting: a report from the National Readmission Database. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021
- 8 Schamroth Pravda N, Perl L, Greenberg G. et al. Impact of sex on outcomes of bifurcation lesion percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a single-centre prospective registry. Coron Artery Dis 2022; 31 (01) 31-36
- 9 Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu K. et al. Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial. Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (27) 2523-2536
- 10 Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, Guyon P. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the “culotte” technique. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82 (08) 943-949
- 11 Adriaenssens T, Byrne RA, Dibra A. et al. Culotte stenting technique in coronary bifurcation disease: angiographic follow-up using dedicated quantitative coronary angiographic analysis and 12-month clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J 2008; 29 (23) 2868-2876
- 12 Erglis A, Kumsars I, Niemelä M. et al; Nordic PCI Study Group. Randomized comparison of coronary bifurcation stenting with the crush versus the culotte technique using sirolimus eluting stents: the Nordic stent technique study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2 (01) 27-34
- 13 Kervinen K, Niemelä M, Romppanen H. et al; Nordic PCI Study Group. Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up results. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (11) 1160-1165
- 14 Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Watkins S. et al. Culotte stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions with 2nd and 3rd generation everolimus-eluting stents: the CELTIC Bifurcation Study. EuroIntervention 2018; 14: e318-e324
- 15 Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ. et al. A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57 (08) 914-920
- 16 Chen SL, Xu B, Han YL. et al. Clinical outcome after DK Crush versus culotte stenting of distal left main bifurcation lesions: the 3-year follow-up results of the DKCRUSH-III study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8 (10) 1335-1342
- 17 Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y. et al. Double kissing crush versus provisional stenting for left main distal bifurcation lesions: DKCRUSH-V randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70 (21) 2605-2617
- 18 Chen X, Li X, Zhang JJ. et al; DKCRUSH-V Investigators. 3-year outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V trial comparing DK Crush with provisional stenting for left main bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12 (19) 1927-1937
- 19 Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (02) 87-165 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 1;40(37):3096
- 20 Naganuma T, Chieffo A, Meliga E. et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (12) 1242-1249
- 21 Guo CL, Yu XP, Yang BG. et al. Long-term outcomes of PCI vs. CABG for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery. J Geriatr Cardiol 2017; 14 (04) 254-260
- 22 Yildirimturk O, Cansel M, Erdim R, Ozen E, Demiroglu IC, Aytekin V. Coexistence of left main and right coronary artery ostial stenosis: demographic and angiographic features. Int J Angiol 2011; 20 (01) 33-38
- 23 Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW. et al; EXCEL Trial Investigators. Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (23) 2223-2235
- 24 Serruys PW, Cavalcante R, Collet C. et al. Outcomes after coronary stenting or bypass surgery for men and women with unprotected left main disease: The EXCEL Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11 (13) 1234-1243
- 25 Buchanan GL, Chieffo A, Meliga E. et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention (with drug-eluting stents) versus coronary artery bypass grafting in women with severe narrowing of the left main coronary artery (from the Women-Drug-Eluting stent for LefT main coronary Artery disease Registry). Am J Cardiol 2014; 113 (08) 1348-1355
- 26 Holm NR, Mäkikallio T, Lindsay MM. et al; NOBLE investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet 2020; 395 (10219): 191-199
- 27 Hildick-Smith D, Egred M, Banning A. et al. The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN). Eur Heart J 2021; 42 (37) 3829-3839
- 28 Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J. et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: the ULTIMATE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72 (24) 3126-3137
- 29 Jones DA, Rathod KS, Koganti S. et al. Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes from the pan-London PCI cohort. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11 (14) 1313-1321
- 30 Velagapudi P, Altin SE, Schneider MD. et al. Sex differences in intracoronary imaging and functional evaluation of coronary arteries. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2021; 14: 7 DOI: 10.1007/s12410-021-09557-3.
- 31 Holm NR, Andreasen LN, Walsh S. et al. Rational and design of the European randomized Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction Trial (OCTOBER). Am Heart J 2018; 205: 97-109
- 32 Al Rashdan I, Amin H. Carina modification T stenting, a new bifurcation stenting technique: clinical and angiographic data from the first 156 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74 (05) 683-690
- 33 Burzotta F, Sgueglia GA, Trani C. et al. Provisional TAP-stenting strategy to treat bifurcated lesions with drug-eluting stents: one-year clinical results of a prospective registry. J Invasive Cardiol 2009; 21 (10) 532-537
- 34 Naganuma T, Latib A, Basavarajaiah S. et al. The long-term clinical outcome of T-stenting and small protrusion technique for coronary bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (06) 554-561
- 35 Jim MH, Wu EB, Fung RC. et al. Angiographic result of T-stenting with small protrusion using drug-eluting stents in the management of ischemic side branch: the ARTEMIS study. Heart Vessels 2014
- 36 Džavík V, Colombo A. The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: insights from bench testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7 (01) 81-88
- 37 Burzotta F, Gwon HC, Hahn JY. et al. Modified T-stenting with intentional protrusion of the side-branch stent within the main vessel stent to ensure ostial coverage and facilitate final kissing balloon: the T-stenting and small protrusion technique (TAP-stenting). Report of bench testing and first clinical Italian-Korean two-centre experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70 (01) 75-82
- 38 Raphael CE, O'Kane PD. Contemporary approaches to bifurcation stenting. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 10: 2048004021992190
- 39 Burzotta F, Džavík V, Ferenc M, Trani C, Stankovic G. Technical aspects of the T And small Protrusion (TAP) technique. EuroIntervention 2015; 11 (Suppl V ): V91-V95
- 40 Wang R, Ding Y, Yang J. et al. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01979-9