Subscribe to RSS
Dashboard Design to Identify and Balance Competing Risk of Multiple Hospital-Acquired ConditionsFunding This study was supported under a contract with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Contract HHSP2332015000251 and HHSP23337003T.
Background Hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) are common, costly, and national patient safety priority. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI), and falls are common HACs. Clinicians assess each HAC risk independent of other conditions. Prevention strategies often focus on the reduction of a single HAC rather than considering how actions to prevent one condition could have unintended consequences for another HAC.
Objectives The objective of this study is to design an empirical framework to identify, assess, and quantify the risks of multiple HACs (MHACs) related to competing single-HAC interventions.
Methods This study was an Institutional Review Board approved, and the proof of concept study evaluated MHAC Competing Risk Dashboard to enhance clinicians' management combining the risks of CAUTI, HAPI, and falls. The empirical model informing this study focused on the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter to reduce CAUTI, which may impact HAPI and falls. A multisite database was developed to understand and quantify competing risks of HACs; a predictive model dashboard was designed and clinical utility of a high-fidelity dashboard was qualitatively tested. Five hospital systems provided data for the predictive model prototype; three served as sites for testing and feedback on the dashboard design and usefulness. The participatory study design involved think-aloud methods as the clinician explored the dashboard. Individual interviews provided an understanding of clinician's perspective regarding ease of use and utility.
Results Twenty-five clinicians were interviewed. Clinicians favored a dashboard gauge design composed of green, yellow, and red segments to depict MHAC risk associated with the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter to reduce CAUTI and possible adverse effects on HAPI and falls.
Conclusion Participants endorsed the utility of a visual dashboard guiding clinical decisions for MHAC risks preferring common stoplight color understanding. Clinicians did not want mandatory alerts for tool integration into the electronic health record. More research is needed to understand MHAC and tools to guide clinician decisions.
Keywordsclinical decision support - testing and feedback - alerts - monitor and manage - inpatient records - dashboard - pressure ulcer - catheter-associated urinary tract infections - patient harm
The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s) who are responsible for the content and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this document should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Identifiable information on which this publication is based is protected by federal law, Section 934(c) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 USC 299c-3(c). No identifiable information about any individuals or entities supplying the information or described in it may be knowingly used except in accordance with their prior consent. Any confidential identifiable information in this publication that is knowingly disclosed is disclosed solely for the purpose for which it was provided. C.D.M. was a PhD student at the University of Colorado School of Public Health throughout the study period. She is now employed by IBM Watson Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
All study procedures were approved by an academic institutional review board, the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, (#16-2020) Aurora, CO. Study participants provided verbal informed consent and received a $50 gift card incentive for participation.
Received: 05 December 2021
Accepted: 27 April 2022
Article published online:
08 June 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
- 1 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Saving lives and saving money: hospital-acquired conditions update. Published November 2015. Updated January 2018. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/pfp/2014-final.html
- 2 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Declines in hospital-acquired conditions save 8,000 lives and $2.9 billion in costs. Published June 5, 2018. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/press-releases/declines-in-hacs.html
- 3 Hamadi H, Tafili A, Apatu E, Park S, Spaulding A. Medicare' hospital-acquired condition reduction program and community diversity in the United States: the need to account for racial and ethnic segregation. Hosp Top 2019; 97 (04) 148-155
- 4 Sankaran R, Gulseren B, Nuliyalu U. et al. A comparison of estimated cost savings from potential reductions in hospital-acquired conditions to levied penalties under the CMS hospital-acquired condition reduction program. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020; 46 (08) 438-447 [published correction appears in Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2021 Jan 19]
- 5 Manojlovich M, Lee S, Lauseng D. A systematic review of the unintended consequences of clinical interventions to reduce adverse outcomes. J Patient Saf 2016; 12 (04) 173-179
- 6 Oman KS, Makic MB, Fink R. et al. Nurse-directed interventions to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40 (06) 548-553
- 7 Gritz RM, Wald H, Makic MB. et al. Identifying, Assessing, and Balancing Competing Risks of Multiple Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HACs). Report to US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2018 Contract HHSP2332015000251 and HHSP23337003T
- 8 Padula WV, Armstrong DG, Goldman DP. Complexity bias in the prevention of iatrogenic injury: why specific harms may inhibit performance. Mayo Clin Proc 2022; 97 (02) 221-224
- 9 Senathirajah Y, Kaufman DR, Cato KD, Borycki EM, Fawcett JA, Kushniruk AW. Characterizing and visualizing display and task fragmentation in the electronic health record: mixed methods design. JMIR Human Factors 2020; 7 (04) e18484
- 10 Wald H, Richard A, Dickson VV, Capezuti E. Chief nursing officers' perspectives on Medicare's hospital-acquired conditions non-payment policy: implications for policy design and implementation. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 78
- 11 Reeder B, Makic MBF, Morrow C. et al. Design and evaluation of low-fidelity visual display prototypes for multiple hospital-acquired conditions. Comput Inform Nurs 2020; 38 (11) 562-571
- 12 Roman LC, Ancker JS, Johnson SB, Senathirajah Y. Navigation in the electronic health record: a review of the safety and usability literature. J Biomed Inform 2017; 67: 69-79
- 13 Mills S. Electronic health records and use of clinical decision support. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2019; 31 (02) 125-131
- 14 Fazaeli S, Khodaveisi T, Vakilzadeh AK. et al. Development, implementation, and user evaluation of COVID-19 dashbaord in a third-level hospital in Iran. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (05) 1091-1100
- 15 Nimjee T, Miller E, Solomon S. Exploring generational differences in physicians' perspectives on the proliferation of technology within the medical field: a narrative study. Healthc Q 2020; 23 (SP): 53-59
- 16 MaCurdy T, Gritz RM. Measuring the influence of unemployment insurance on unemployment experiences. J Bus Econ Stat 1997; 15 (02) 130-152
- 17 Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson Jr AV, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow NE. The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 1978; 34 (04) 541-554
- 18 Gritz RM, Theobald ND. The effects of school district spending priorities on length of stay in teaching. J Hum Resour 1996; 31 (03) 477-512
- 19 Theobald ND, Gritz RM. The effects of school district spending priorities on the exit paths of beginning teachers leaving a district. Econ Educ Rev 1996; 15 (01) 11-22
- 20 Shashikumar SA, Waken RJ, Luke AA, Nerenz DR, Joynt Maddox KE. Association of stratification by proportion of patients dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid with financial penalties in the hospital-acquired condition reduction program. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181 (03) 330-338
- 21 Zogg CK, Thumma JR, Ryan AM, Dimick JB. Medicare's hospital acquired condition reduction program disproportionately affects minority-serving hospitals: variation by race, socioeconomic status, and disproportionate share hospital payment receipt. Ann Surg 2020; 271 (06) 985-993
- 22 Buntin MB, Ayanian JZ. Social risk factors and equity in Medicare payment. N Engl J Med 2017; 376 (06) 507-510
- 23 Jeffery AD, Novak LL, Kennedy B, Dietrich MS, Mion LC. Participatory design of probability-based decision support tools for in-hospital nurses. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (06) 1102-1110
- 24 Jaspers MW, Steen T, van den Bos C, Geenen M. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 (11-12): 781-795
- 25 Richter Lagha R, Burningham Z, Sauer BC. et al. Usability testing a potentially inappropriate medication dashboard: a core component of the dashboard development process. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (04) 528-534
- 26 Kilsdonk E, Peute LW, Jaspers MW. Factors influencing implementation success of guideline-based clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and gaps analysis. Int J Med Inform 2017; 98: 56-64
- 27 Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 117
- 28 Bersani K, Fuller TE, Garabedian P. et al. Use, perceived usability, and barriers to implementation of a patient safety dashboard integrated within a vendor EHR. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 34-45
- 29 Braithwaite J. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement. BMJ 2018; 361: k2014
- 30 Nelson O, Sturgis B, Gilbert K. et al. A visual analytics dashboard to summarize serial anesthesia records in pediatric radiation treatment. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (04) 563-569