Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749622
Comparison Between Surgical and Conservative Treatment for AOSpine Type A3 and A4 Thoracolumbar Fractures without Neurological Deficit: Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Article in several languages: português | English
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical results between conservative (CS) and surgical treatment (CXS) of A3 and A4 fractures without neurological deficit.
Methods Prospective observational study of patients with thoracolumbar fractures type A3 and A4. These patients were separated between the surgical and conservative groups, and evaluated sequentially through the numeric rating scale (NRS), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) quality of life questionnaire, and Denis work scale (DWS) up to 2.5 years of follow-up.
Results Both groups showed significant improvement, with no statistical difference in pain questionnaires (NRS: CXS 2.4 ± 2.6; CS 3.5 ± 2.6; p > 0.05), functionality (RMDQ: CS 7 ± 6.4; CXS 5.5 ± 5.2; p > 0.05), quality of life (EQ-5D), and return to work (DWS).
Conclusion Both treatments are viable options with equivalent clinical results. There is a tendency toward better results in the surgical treatment of A4 fractures.
Financial Support
This study had financial and logistical support from AOSpine Latin America.
Multicenter work developed at the Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR and the Hospital Cristo Redentor, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 23 October 2021
Accepted: 28 April 2022
Article published online:
24 March 2023
© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1
Wood K,
Buttermann G,
Mehbod A,
Garvey T,
Jhanjee R,
Sechriest V.
Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without
neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;
85 (05) 773-781
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Jansson KA,
Blomqvist P,
Svedmark P.
et al.
Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Sweden: an analysis of 13,496 patients admitted
to hospital. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25 (06) 431-437
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Vaccaro AR,
Oner C,
Kepler CK.
et al;
AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury & Trauma Knowledge Forum.
AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological
status, and key modifiers. Spine 2013; 38 (23) 2028-2037
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Siebenga J,
Leferink VJ,
Segers MJ.
et al.
Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized
study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine 2006; 31 (25) 2881-2890
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Post RB,
van der Sluis CK,
Leferink VJ,
Dijkstra PU,
ten Duis HJ.
Nonoperatively treated type A spinal fractures: mid-term versus long-term functional
outcome. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (04) 1055-1060
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Vorlat P,
Leirs G,
Tajdar F,
Hulsmans H,
De Boeck H,
Vaes P.
Predictors of Recovery After Conservative Treatment of AO-Type A Thoracolumbar Spine
Fractures Without Neurological Deficit. Spine 2018; 43 (02) 141-147
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Pehlivanoglu T,
Akgul T,
Bayram S.
et al.
Conservative Versus Operative Treatment of Stable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures in
Neurologically Intact Patients: Is There Any Difference Regarding the Clinical and
Radiographic Outcomes?. Spine 2020; 45 (07) 452-458
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Wood KB,
Buttermann GR,
Phukan R.
et al.
Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without
neurological deficit: a prospective randomized study with follow-up at sixteen to
twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (01) 3-9
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Yi L,
Jingping B,
Gele J,
Baoleri X,
Taixiang W.
Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without
neurological deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (04) CD005079
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Rometsch E,
Spruit M,
Härtl R.
et al.
Does Operative or Nonoperative Treatment Achieve Better Results in A3 and A4 Spinal
Fractures Without Neurological Deficit?: Systematic Literature Review With Meta-Analysis.
Global Spine J 2017; 7 (04) 350-372
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Butler JS,
Walsh A,
O'Byrne J.
Functional outcome of burst fractures of the first lumbar vertebra managed surgically
and conservatively. Int Orthop 2005; 29 (01) 51-54
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Rajasekaran S.
Thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: the role for conservative
treatment. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (Suppl. 01) S40-S47
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Aebi M.
Classification of thoracolumbar fractures and dislocations. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (Suppl.
01) S2-S7
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Shen WJ,
Liu TJ,
Shen YS.
Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst
fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 2001; 26 (09) 1038-1045
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Rabb CH,
Hoh DJ,
Anderson PA.
et al.
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines
on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Operative
Versus Nonoperative Treatment. Neurosurgery 2019; 84 (01) E50-E52
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Cantor JB,
Lebwohl NH,
Garvey T,
Eismont FJ.
Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures with early ambulation
and bracing. Spine 1993; 18 (08) 971-976
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Bailey CS,
Dvorak MF,
Thomas KC.
et al.
Comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthosis and no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar
burst fractures: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical equivalence
trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11 (03) 295-303
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Bailey CS,
Urquhart JC,
Dvorak MF.
et al.
Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without
neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial. Spine J
2014; 14 (11) 2557-2564
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Breivik H,
Borchgrevink PC,
Allen SM.
et al.
Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101 (01) 17-24
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Roland M,
Morris R.
A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and
sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983; 8 (02) 141-144
MissingFormLabel
- 21
EuroQol Group.
EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health
Policy 1990; 16 (03) 199-208
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Haywood KL,
Garratt AM,
Fitzpatrick R.
Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health
instruments. Qual Life Res 2005; 14 (07) 1651-1668
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Denis F,
Armstrong GW,
Searls K,
Matta L.
Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison
between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; (189) 142-149
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Sadatsune DA,
Costa PP,
Caffaro MF,
Umeta RS,
Meves R,
Avanzi O.
Thoracolumbar burst fracture: correlation between kyphosis and function after surgical
treatment. Rev Bras Ortop 2015; 47 (04) 474-478
MissingFormLabel