PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2023; 17(02): 418-423
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750771
Original Article

The Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Ethanolic Propolis Compound toward Nucleic Acid Deposition in the Extracellular Polymeric Substance of Root Canal Bacteria

Arya Adiningrat
1   Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2   Molecular Medicine and Therapy Laboratory of Research Division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
Rifkhi A. Kusnadi
3   Clinical Program of School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
Asyam S. Allam
3   Clinical Program of School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
Erma Sofiani
4   Department of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
Ikhsan Maulana
2   Molecular Medicine and Therapy Laboratory of Research Division, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
Hiromichi Yumoto 
5   Department of Periodontology and Endodontology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
› Institutsangaben Funding This research was supported by University Research Institute (LP3M) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (grant no.: 034/PEN-LP3M/I/2020).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Apis trigona ethanolic propolis and probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus on the nucleic acid concentration in the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) derived from biofilm of root canal bacteria.

Materials and Methods Clinical bacteria of the root canal were cultured with ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP; 10 or 0.1%) and L. acidophilus. After the formation of biofilm was observed in the monolayer bacterial culture under several conditions, the enzymatic treatment and nucleic acid quantification were sequentially performed.

Statistical Analysis Independent t-test and Mann–Whitney were performed following data normality to analyze the significant differences of the treatment effect on the nucleic acid concentration in EPS from the isolated biofilm.

Results The results showed that the nucleic acid concentration in EPS biofilm were not increased by coculture with L. acidophilus as probiotics. However, the treatment with 10% EEP could significantly increase nucleic acid concentration.

Conclusion This study suggested that the biosurfactants from probiotic bacteria L. acidophilus might be a promising candidate for endodontic treatment, arguably better than EEP in inhibiting biofilm maturation and complexity.

Keywords

ethanolic extract of propolis - extracellular polymeric substance - Lactobacillus acidophilus - extracellular nucleic acid - probiotics bacteria - root canal biofilm


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Juli 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Endo MS, Ferraz CCR, Zaia AA, Almeida JFA, Gomes BPFA. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of microorganisms in root-filled teeth with persistent infection: monitoring of the endodontic retreatment. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (03) 302-309
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: the usual suspects. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (01) 144-147
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8 (01) 76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Narayanan LL, Vaishnavi C. Endodontic microbiology. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13 (04) 233-239
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Montanaro L, Poggi A, Visai L. et al. Extracellular DNA in biofilms. Int J Artif Organs 2011; 34 (09) 824-831
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Okshevsky M, Meyer RL. The role of extracellular DNA in the establishment, maintenance and perpetuation of bacterial biofilms. Crit Rev Microbiol 2015; 41 (03) 341-352
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ibáñez de Aldecoa AL, Zafra O, González-Pastor JE. Mechanisms and regulation of extracellular DNA release and its biological roles in microbial communities. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 1390
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Domenech M, García E. Autolysin-independent DNA release in Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro biofilms. Microbiology 2018; 2 (03) 1-8
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Prabhurajeshwar C, Chandrakanth RK. Probiotic potential of Lactobacilli with antagonistic activity against pathogenic strains: an in vitro validation for the production of inhibitory substances. Biomed J 2017; 40 (05) 270-283
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bohora A, Kokate S. Evaluation of the role of probiotics in endodontic treatment: a preliminary study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017; 7 (01) 46-51
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wasfi R, Abd El-Rahman OA, Zafer MM, Ashour HM. Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans . J Cell Mol Med 2018; 22 (03) 1972-1983
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Widyarman AS, Theodorea CF. Novel indigenous probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri strain produces anti-biofilm reuterin against pathogenic periodontal bacteria. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (01) 96-101
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Shokri D, Khorasgani MR, Mohkam M, Fatemi SM, Ghasemi Y, Taheri-Kafrani A. The inhibition effect of Lactobacilli against growth and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2018; 10 (01) 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kim NN, Kim WJ, Kang SS. Anti-biofilm effect of crude bacteriocin derived from Lactobacillus brevis DF01 on Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium . Food Control 2019; 98: 274-280
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Meneses IHC, Sampaio GAM, Carvalho FG. et al. In vivo biocompatibility, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of cements modified with propolis in different concentrations. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 77-84
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Refaat H, Mady FM, Sarhan HA, Rateb HS, Alaaeldin E. Optimization and evaluation of propolis liposomes as a promising therapeutic approach for COVID-19. Int J Pharm 2021; 592: 120028
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Pasupuleti VR, Sammugam L, Ramesh N, Gan SH. Honey, propolis, and royal jelly: a comprehensive review of their biological actions and health benefits. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017; 2017: 1259510
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Fauzi AF, Indiana SK, Wicaksono RH, Adiningrat A. A challenge in ethanolic propolis utilization from Apis trigona as an oral antimicrobial agent. J Int Dent Med Res 2018; 11 (02) 682-686
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Doğanlı GA, Ülger G, Doğan NM. Antibiofilm activity and chemical contents of propolis samples from Manisa-Turkey. Hacettepe J Biol Chem 2016; 44 (04) 505-513
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Veloz JJ, Saavedra N, Lillo A, Alvear M, Barrientos L, Salazar LA. Antibiofilm activity of Chilean propolis on Streptococcus mutans is influenced by the year of collection. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 291351
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Chávez de Paz LE, Sedgley CM, Kishen A. eds. The Root Canal Biofilm. Vol 9. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2015
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wu J, Xi C. Evaluation of different methods for extracting extracellular DNA from the biofilm matrix. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75 (16) 5390-5395
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Tarentino AL, Plummer Jr TH. Enzymatic deglycosylation of asparagine-linked glycans: purification, properties, and specificity of oligosaccharide-cleaving enzymes from Flavobacterium meningosepticum . Methods Enzymol 1994; 230: 44-57
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kaplan JB, Ragunath C, Velliyagounder K, Fine DH, Ramasubbu N. Enzymatic detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48 (07) 2633-2636
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Elbadri S, Fathi MS, Abdel Hamid AE, Abd Allah AH. The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic against Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth and biofilm formation. Novel Research in Microbiology Journal 2019; 3 (04) 428-439
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Barzegari A, Kheyrolahzadeh K, Hosseiniyan Khatibi SM, Sharifi S, Memar MY, Zununi Vahed S. The battle of probiotics and their derivatives against biofilms. Infect Drug Resist 2020; 13: 659-672
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Matsumoto-Nakano M. Role of Streptococcus mutans surface proteins for biofilm formation. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2018; 54 (01) 22-29
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Satpute SK, Mone NS, Das P, Banat IM, Banpurkar AG. Inhibition of pathogenic bacterial biofilms on PDMS based implants by L. acidophilus derived biosurfactant. BMC Microbiol 2019; 19 (01) 39
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Prado-Acosta M, Ruzal SM, Allievi MC, Palomino MM, Sanchez Rivas C. Synergistic effects of the Lactobacillus acidophilus surface layer and nisin on bacterial growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76 (03) 974-977
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Tahmourespour A, Salehi R, Kasra Kermanshahi R. Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived biosurfactant effect on GTFB and GTFC expression level in Streptococcus mutans biofilm cells. Braz J Microbiol 2011; 42 (01) 330-339
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar