Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2023; 17(03): 777-783
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755630
Original Article

Effect of Hydrothermal Degradation on Flexural Fatigue Strength of Various Cubic-Containing Translucent Zirconia

Santiphab Kengtanyakich
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Chaimongkon Peampring
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding This study received its funding from the Technologies and Materials in Digital Dentistry Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University and the Royal College of Dental Surgeons, Thailand.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the fatigue and hydrothermal degradation behavior among the cubic-containing translucent yttrium oxide stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP).

Materials and Methods Four groups of commercial Y-TZP (T, ST, XT, and P), containing different amount of cubic crystal, were examined. Artificial aging was accomplished by autoclaving at 122°C under 2 bar pressure for 8 hours. Fatigue simulation parameters were set using an axial 50 N load, a total of 240,000 cycles. Flexural fatigue strength was evaluated.

Statistical Analysis Two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference test was used to determine the difference in fatigue strength values between various type of zirconia materials within control and aging with a significant level of 5%. Weibull analysis was conducted on the fatigue strength data.

Results All groups showed the mean flexural fatigue strength had no significant difference in hydrothermally aged specimens compared with specimens without aging (p = 0.154). Group T showed significantly higher flexural fatigue strength followed by group ST, XT, and P. Group XT and P showed no significant difference in strength value (p > 0.05). Group T demonstrated a lower probability of failure than group ST, XT, and P whether with or without aging. Weibull modulus in group T and ST with aging condition was increased and higher than all the experimental groups.

Conclusion Cubic-containing zirconia materials (group ST, XT, and P) exhibited lower flexural fatigue strength than non-cubic 3Y-TZP zirconia (group T). However, various cubic-containing translucent zirconia was assumed to have high resistance to hydrothermal degradation.

Keywords

zirconia ceramic - translucent zirconia - cubic phase - flexural fatigue strength - hydrothermal degradation


Publication History

Article published online:
11 October 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28 (03) 227-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kim JW, Covel NS, Guess PC, Rekow ED, Zhang Y. Concerns of hydrothermal degradation in CAD/CAM zirconia. J Dent Res 2010; 89 (01) 91-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: a critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater 2010; 26 (08) 807-820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pereira GK, Silvestri T, Camargo R. et al. Mechanical behavior of a Y-TZP ceramic for monolithic restorations: effect of grinding and low-temperature aging. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 63: 70-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM. Influence of low-temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia. J Prosthodont 2012; 21 (05) 363-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Flinn BD, Raigrodski AJ, Mancl LA, Toivola R, Kuykendall T. Influence of aging on flexural strength of translucent zirconia for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117 (02) 303-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kengtanyakich S, Peampring C. An experimental study on hydrothermal degradation of cubic-containing translucent zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2020; 12 (05) 265-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013. :60–61,454
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75 (01) 18-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (10) 1195-1203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Church TD, Jessup JP, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Translucency and strength of high-translucency monolithic zirconium oxide materials. Gen Dent 2017; 65 (01) 48-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ramesh S, Sara Lee KY, Tan CY. A review on the hydrothermal ageing behaviour of Y-TZP ceramics. Ceram Int 2018; 44: 20620-20634
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kontonasaki E, Giasimakopoulos P, Rigos AE. Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2020; 56 (01) 1-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Carrabba M, Keeling AJ, Aziz A. et al. Translucent zirconia in the ceramic scenario for monolithic restorations: a flexural strength and translucency comparison test. J Dent 2017; 60: 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 ISO 6872. Dentistry - Ceramic materials. Geneva; Switzerland: International Standards Organization (ISO); 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:6872:ed-4:v1:en
  • 16 Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951; 128: 293-297
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tekin YH, Hayran Y. Fracture resistance and marginal fit of the zirconia crowns with varied occlusal thickness. J Adv Prosthodont 2020; 12 (05) 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hannink RH, Kelly PM, Muddle BC. Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2000; 83: 461-487
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zhang F, Inokoshi M, Batuk M. et al. Strength, toughness and aging stability of highly-translucent Y-TZP ceramics for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2016; 32 (12) e327-e337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pereira GKR, Guilardi LF, Dapieve KS, Kleverlaan CJ, Rippe MP, Valandro LF. Mechanical reliability, fatigue strength and survival analysis of new polycrystalline translucent zirconia ceramics for monolithic restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 85: 57-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Holman CD, Lien W, Gallardo FF, Vandewalle KS. Assessing flexural strength degradation of new cubic containing zirconia materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21 (02) 114-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schatz C, Strickstrock M, Roos M. et al. Influence of specimen preparation and test methods on the flexural strength results of monolithic zirconia materials. Materials (Basel) 2016; 9: 180 (1–13)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R. et al. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 35: 93-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chevalier J, Cales B, Drouin JM. Low-temperature aging of Y-TZP ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1999; 82: 2150-2154
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Peampring C, Kengtanyakich S. Surface roughness andtranslucencyof various translucent zirconia ceramics after hydrothermal aging. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 761-767
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sato T, Shimada M. Transformation of yttria-doped tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystals by annealing in water. J Am Ceram Soc 1985; 68: 356-359
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lange FF, Dunlop GL, Davis BI. Degradation during aging of transformation-toughened ZrO2-Y2O3 materials at 250°C. J Am Ceram Soc 1986; 69: 237-240
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20 (01) 1-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008; 24 (03) 289-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pang Z, Chughtai A, Sailer I, Zhang Y. A fractographic study of clinically retrieved zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater 2015; 31 (10) 1198-1206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Quinn GD. Fractography of ceramics and glasses. A NIST recommended practice guide, special publication 960–916. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2016. :31–69
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Volpato CAM, Garbelotto LGA, Fredel MC, Bondioli F. Application of zirconia in dentistry: biological, mechanical and optical considerations. In: Sikalidis C, ed. Advances in Ceramics – Electric and Magnetic Ceramics, Bioceramics, Ceramics and Environment. In Tech Open; 2011:397–420
    Google Scholar