Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757310
Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients Above and Under 65 Years Old Submitted to Total Knee Arthroplasty
Article in several languages: português | English
Abstract
Objective To compare the level of quality of life and satisfaction after two years of total knee arthroplasties between individuals above and below 65 years of age and to identify predictor factors of poor clinical outcome and low level of satisfaction in patients undergoing arthroplasty.
Methods This is a retrospective cohort with data from patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis submitted to primary total knee arthroplasty from 2014 to 2018 (n = 190). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the following scores: visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, EQ-5D-3L and EUROQOL-VAS (quality of life scales), patient satisfaction level, and functional scale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), collected through a questionnaire applied preoperatively, as well as 1, 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery.
Results Patients < 65 years old presented significantly lower values (clinical worsening) in KOOS-pain and KOOS-symptoms. There are no differences in the principal clinical scores that assess pain, function, and quality of life after the procedure, as well as in the rate of satisfaction with the procedure, among patients < 65 years old when compared with patients ≥ 65 years old. It was also observed that patients who were not satisfied with the procedure in the 24-month evaluation presented clinical results in some analyzed scores (KOOS-pain and EQ-VAS) similar to patients who declared themselves satisfied.
Conclusion Scores that assess pain, function, quality of life, as well as satisfaction rate are similar between patients < 65 years old and those ≥ 65 years old.
Keywords
arthroplasty, replacement, knee - musculoskeletal pain - osteoarthritis - patient satisfaction - postoperative complications - perioperative careFinancial Support
The present study received no financial support from either public, commercial, or not-for-profit sources.
Work developed in the Department of Orthopedics, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 29 May 2022
Accepted: 17 August 2022
Article published online:
24 March 2023
© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1
OECD.
(2016), “Hip and knee replacement”, in Health at a Glance: Europe 2016: State of Health
in the EU Cycle, OECD Publishing, Paris. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance_eur-2016-60-en
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Krummenauer F,
Wolf C,
Günther KP,
Kirschner S.
Clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the older patient.
Eur J Med Res 2009; 14 (02) 76-84
MissingFormLabel
- 3
da Silva RR,
Santos AA,
de Sampaio Carvalho Júnior J,
Matos MA.
Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: systematic review. Rev Bras Ortop 2014;
49 (05) 520-527
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Felix J,
Becker C,
Vogl M,
Buschner P,
Plötz W,
Leidl R.
Patient characteristics and valuation changes impact quality of life and satisfaction
in total knee arthroplasty - results from a German prospective cohort study. Health
Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17 (01) 180
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Knutson K,
Lindstrand A,
Lidgren L.
Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68 (05) 795-803
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Klit J,
Jacobsen S,
Rosenlund S,
Sonne-Holm S,
Troelsen A.
Total knee arthroplasty in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.
J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 912-917
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Rand JA,
Ilstrup DM.
Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of
9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 (03) 397-409
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Parvizi J,
Nunley RM,
Berend KR.
et al.
High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 133-137
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Diduch DR,
Insall JN,
Scott WN,
Scuderi GR,
Font-Rodriguez D.
Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional
outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79 (04) 575-582
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Rothwell PM,
McDowell Z,
Wong CK,
Dorman PJ.
Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors'
perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 1997; 314 (7094):
1580-1583
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Janse AJ,
Gemke RJ,
Uiterwaal CS,
van der Tweel I,
Kimpen JL,
Sinnema G.
Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis. J Clin
Epidemiol 2004; 57 (07) 653-661
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Bullens PH,
van Loon CJ,
de Waal Malefijt MC,
Laan RF,
Veth RP.
Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective
and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (06) 740-747
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Hootman JM,
Helmick CG.
Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis
Rheum 2006; 54 (01) 226-229
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Williams DP,
Price AJ,
Beard DJ.
et al.
The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements.
Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (01) 38-44
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Scott CE,
Oliver WM,
MacDonald D,
Wade FA,
Moran M,
Breusch SJ.
Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55
years of age. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (12) 1625-1634
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Noble PC,
Conditt MA,
Cook KF,
Mathis KB.
The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452 (452) 35-43
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Mäntyselkä P,
Kumpusalo E,
Ahonen R,
Takala J.
Patients' versus general practitioners' assessments of pain intensity in primary care
patients with non-cancer pain. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51 (473) 995-997
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Niemeläinen M,
Moilanen T,
Huhtala H,
Eskelinen A.
Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or less: a prospective study
of 232 patients with 2-year follow-up. Scand J Surg 2019; 108 (04) 313-320
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Gunaratne R,
Pratt DN,
Banda J,
Fick DP,
Khan RJK,
Robertson BW.
Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of
the Literature. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (12) 3854-3860
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Foni NO,
Costa LAV,
Paião ID.
et al.
Clinical pathway improves medical practice in total knee arthroplasty. PLoS One 2020;
15 (05) e0232881
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Scott CE,
Howie CR,
MacDonald D,
Biant LC.
Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of
1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (09) 1253-1258
MissingFormLabel