Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2023; 13(03): 395-399
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757731
Original Article

Comparison of Class Room Lectures with Fishbowl-Snowball Activity for Dental Undergraduate Students: An Observational Study

Amitha M. Hegde
1   Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Shreema Shetty
2   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A J Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Deepshikha Mehrotra
1   Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Traditional classroom lectures have been the backbone of the education system for a long time although this method is most effective but it may not always permit active engagement with the matter and learn it. In contrast, active teaching formats such as fishbowl and snowball techniques allow students to participate in the task of attaining knowledge by shifting the target from preceptor to student, thereby allowing a better understanding of the concepts.

Methodology A total of 80 final-year undergraduate dental students were included in this study. Each student was informed regarding study design and protocol. A lecture on the principles of Pediatric Endodontics was delivered to the students in small groups using the routine virtual method, following which a pre-test activity questionnaire and formal thinking questionnaire were given to the students for scoring. Following this, the class of 80 was divided into smaller groups of four each and the Fishbowl–snowball activity was performed. A post-test activity questionnaire and formal thinking questionnaire were given once again to the students for scoring. The mean pre and post-test scores were statistically analyzed using paired t-test by statistical software SPSS version 20. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results The overall mean difference between pre and post-test activity and formal thinking scores was seen to be statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion It was seen that a combination of fishbowl and snowball method of teaching led to more satisfactory results as compared with the routine classroom teaching method.

Keywords

fishbowl - snowball throwing technique - active teaching - dental education


Publication History

Article published online:
28 November 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Long A, Lock B. Lectures and large groups. In: Swanwick T. ed. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice, 1st ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014: 137-148
    Google Scholar
  • 2 McCrorie P. Teaching and leading small groups. In: Swanwick T. ed. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014: 123-136
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bligh D.. Learning to teach in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 1992; 18 (01) 105-111
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Prince M. Does active learning work? a review of the research. J Eng Educ 2004; 93 (03) 223-231
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Adv Physiol Educ 2006; 30 (04) 159-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Friedlander MJ, Andrews L, Armstrong EG. et al. What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning?. Acad Med 2011; 86 (04) 415-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sawatsky AP, Berlacher K, Granieri R. Using an ACTIVE teaching format versus a standard lecture format for increasing resident interaction and knowledge achievement during noon conference: a prospective, controlled study. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kane CM. Fishbowl training in group process. J Spec Group Work 1995; 20 (03) 183-188
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Grabosky F. The dynamic commitment design. Small Group Behav 1985; 16 (01) 111-119
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jaques D. Teaching small groups. BMJ 2003; 326 (7387): 492-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Eitington JE. ed. The Winning Trainer. 4th ed. Taylor & Francis: 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Andreas K, Tsiatsos T, Terzidou T, Pomportsis A. Fostering collaborative learning in Second Life: Metaphors and affordances. Comput Educ 2010; 55 (02) 603-615
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Williana D, Anugrah WP, Kareviati E. Improving English speaking ability using the snowball throwing games technique. PROJECT 2020; 3 (01) 43
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29 (05) 489-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pearson SC, Eddlemon T, Kirkwood M, Pate A. Are fishbowl activities effective for teaching pharmacotherapy and developing postformal thought in pharmacy students? A pilot study. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2018; 10 (08) 1070-1075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Setiyowati E. The effect of the snowball throwing method on changes in brushing behavior in 4th grade children at Surabaya. Central African J Publ Health 2019; 5 (06) 287
    Google Scholar