CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep 2022; 11(01): e64-e66
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757873
Case Report: Cardiac

Subacute Aortic Rupture Due to Mechanical Chest Compression with Indwelling Impella

1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Wurzburg, Bavaria, Germany
,
Dejan Radakovic
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Wurzburg, Bavaria, Germany
,
Nodir Madrahimov
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Wurzburg, Bavaria, Germany
,
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Würzburg, Wurzburg, Bavaria, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices like Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) cause more skeletal and visceral injuries than standard CPR. A 62-year-old woman with ST-elevation myocardial infarction was resuscitated with LUCAS and Impella CP for refractory cardiogenic shock during percutaneous coronary intervention. She suffered delayed ascending aortic rupture necessitating supracommissural ascending aortic replacement plus triple bypass grafting. Prolonged mechanical CPR with concomitant Impella may lead to aortic rupture. The combined use of LUCAS and Impella may have disastrous consequences.



Publication History

Received: 05 April 2022

Accepted: 09 August 2022

Article published online:
09 November 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Ondruschka B, Baier C, Bayer R, Hammer N, Dreßler J, Bernhard M. Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2018; 14 (04) 515-525
  • 2 Milling L, Mikkelsen S, Astrup BS. Characteristics of mechanical CPR-related injuries: a case series. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 70. 101918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101918
  • 3 Kolopp M, Franchi A, Grafiadis P, Martrille L. Cardiothoracic injuries after CardioPump CPR: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Legal Med 2018; 132 (03) 771-774
  • 4 Soar J, Nolan JP, Böttiger BW. et al; Adult advanced life support section Collaborators. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2015; 95: 100-147
  • 5 Smekal D, Lindgren E, Sandler H, Johansson J, Rubertsson S. CPR-related injuries after manual or mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device: a multicentre study of victims after unsuccessful resuscitation. Resuscitation 2014; 85 (12) 1708-1712
  • 6 Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP. et al. The evolving landscape of Impella use in the United States among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support. Circulation 2020; 141 (04) 273-284
  • 7 Asrress KN, Marciniak M, Briceno N, Perera D. Cardiac arrest in acute myocardial infarction: concept of circulatory support with mechanical chest compression and Impella to facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Lung Circ 2017; 26 (08) e37-e40
  • 8 Lotun K, Truong HT, Cha KC. et al. Cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: combining mechanical chest compressions and percutaneous LV assistance. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12 (18) 1840-1849