Int J Angiol 2023; 32(03): 172-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758384
Original Article

Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Pain Control in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease and Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Authors

  • Douglas Poschinger-Figueiredo

    1   Teaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CT Vascular), Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Carlos Eduardo Virgini-Magalhães

    1   Teaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CT Vascular), Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Claudia Salvador Amorim

    1   Teaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CT Vascular), Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Alessandra Krykhtine Peres Poschinger

    1   Teaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CT Vascular), Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Fernanda Pires Chequer

    1   Teaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CT Vascular), Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Preview

Abstract

Chronic venous disease (CVD) associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux has a higher prevalence of pain in the lower limbs. This study evaluates the impact of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for GSV and symptom control, accessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients with CVD who underwent GSV-UGFS were included in this retrospective cohort (417 limbs). The pain was measured before and after the treatment. The scale alteration was assessed as a function of age, sex, Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classes, total of sclerotherapy sessions, GSV occlusion patterns, and ulcer healing. Majority of patients were female (59.2%), and the mean age was 56 ± 11.5 years. In the total sample, 78.2% of the GSVs were fully occluded, 19.7% had partial occlusion, 2.2% remained open, and 3.2 ± 1.9 (median = 3.0) sessions were performed. The reduction of symptoms occurred in 88.3% of participants (VAS drop median = 4.8). Patients younger than 50 years and females had the greatest VAS decreases. When comparing the outcomes of complete occlusion versus partial occlusion, there was no significant difference in VAS pain reduction (p = 0.14). The comparison between CEAP clinical classes also did not show statistically significant differences in delta VAS (p = 0.71). GSV-UGFS was effective for pain control. However, this improvement does not appear to be related to the pattern of occlusion, indicating that in the short term, the outcomes of total and partial occlusion suggest successful management of symptoms. Other aspects such as gender, age, pretreatment pain intensity, and CEAP classes seem to play a role in the clinical outcome.

Note

This study was accepted for oral abstract presentation at XIX World Congress of Phlebology – 2022 (UIP) Istanbul, Turkey.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. November 2022

© 2022. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA