Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2023; 07(03): 153-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759799
Original Article

Comparison of the Outcome and Efficacy of Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Mesh Stent among Carotid Stenosis Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Setting—A Prospective Observational Study

Authors

  • Vemireddy Pradeep Kumar Reddy

    1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Dr KLEs Prabhakar Kore Hospital & MRC, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Navin M. Mulimani

    1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Dr KLEs Prabhakar Kore Hospital & MRC, Belagavi, Karnataka, India

Funding The project was self-funded. No external agency had funded the project.
Preview

Abstract

The effect of stent design whether single-layer or double-layer on long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unknown. The aim of this article was to compare the clinical outcome and efficacy of single-layer versus dual-layer mesh stent for CAS among carotid stenosis patients. A prospective observational study was conducted among 41 consecutive patients, who underwent CAS procedures between November 2019 and November 2021. Procedural data and outcomes for patients treated with the single-layer stent (n = 19patients) and double-layer stent (n = 22) were compared. Procedural efficacy and complications were considered as primary outcome variable. SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis. Mean age of study population in dual-layer stents group was 63.86 ± 11.08 years and it was 61.47 ± 8.26 years in single-layer stent group. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups with age, stenosis, side of stenosis, prestenting angioplasty, and poststenting angioplasty (p-value >0.05). Out of 22 participants with dual-layer stent, only one (4.5%) participant experienced five episodes of transient ischemic attack in last 1 month. Both clinical and associated complaints were more in dual-layer group compared with single layer. One (5.26%) participant in single-layer group had reclusion/restenosis at 30 days. Majority in single-(57.8%) and double-layer (63.64%) stents group showed modified Rankin Scale score of 0. Restenosis after CAS occurred less frequently in patients treated with double-layer mesh when compared with single-layer stent. However, both stents were equally effective at preventing peri procedural complications.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The participants were informed in detail about the procedures involved, and they provided written informed consent in accordance with the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration, 2008.


Authors' Contribution

V.P.K.R. has conceptualized the study and played primary role in compiling, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All the drafts were prepared, reviewed, and final draft was approved by V.P.K.R. and N.M.M. V.P.K.R. and N.M.M. have contributed in fine tuning of the proposal, data collection, and entry. They reviewed the results and contributed to preparation and review of drafts. All the authors have read and approved final version of the manuscript. All the authors take complete responsibility for the content of the manuscript.




Publication History

Article published online:
22 December 2022

© 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India