Download PDF
Rofo 2017; 189(05): 441-452
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101526
Vessels
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Dual-Energy CTA in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Impeding Factors

Dual Energy CTA bei Patienten mit symptomatischer pAVK: Studie über die diagnostische Genauigkeit und limitierende Faktoren
Thorsten Klink
1   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Würzburg, Germany
3   University Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital – University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
,
Theresa Wilhelm
2   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Germany
,
Christine Roth
2   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Germany
,
Johannes T. Heverhagen
3   University Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital – University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 August 2016

04 January 2017

Publication Date:
01 March 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA) in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) and to identify factors that impede its diagnostic accuracy.

Materials and Methods Dual-source DE-CTA scans of the lower extremities of 94 patients were retrospectively compared to the diagnostic reference standard, digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Two independent observers assessed PAOD incidence, image quality, artifacts, and diagnostic accuracy of DE-CTA in 1014 arterial segments on axial, combined 80/140 kVp reconstructions and on 3 D maximum intensity projections (MIP) after automated bone and plaque removal. The impact of calcifications, image quality, and image artifacts on the diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. Furthermore, interobserver agreement was analyzed.

Results Two observers achieved sensitivities of 98.0 % and 93.9 %, respectively, and specificities of 75.0 % and 66.7 %, respectively, for detecting stenoses of > 50 % of the lower extremity arteries. Calcifications impeded specificity, e. g. from 81.2 % to 46.2 % for reader 1 (p < 0.001). Specificity increased with higher image quality, e. g. from 70.0 % to 76.4 % for reader 1 (p < 0.001). Artifacts decreased the specificity of reader 2 (p < 0.001). The overall interobserver agreement ranged between moderate and substantial for stenosis detection and calcified plaques.

Conclusion DE-CTA is accurate in the detection of arterial stenoses of > 50 % in symptomatic PAOD patients. Calcified atherosclerotic plaques, image quality, and artifacts may impede specificity.

Key Points: 

  • Sensitivities of DE-CTA were 98.0 and 93.9 %, specificities 75.0 % and 66.7 %.

  • Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for stenosis and plaque detection.

  • Calcified atherosclerotic plaques, image quality, and artifacts may impede specificity.

Citation Format

  • Klink T, Wilhelm T, Roth C et al. Dual-Energy CTA in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Impeding Factors. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 441 – 452

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung Das Ziel dieser Studie war, die diagnostische Genauigkeit der Dual-energy CT Angiographie (DE-CTA) bei Patienten mit symptomatischer peripherer arterieller Verschlusskrankheit (pAVK) zu erfassen, und Faktoren zu identifizieren, die die diagnostische Genauigkeit negativ beeinflussen.

Material und Methoden Dual-source DE-CTA Untersuchungen der unteren Extremitäten von 94 Patienten wurden retrospektiv mit dem diagnostischen Referenzstandard digitale Subtraktionsangiografie (DSA) verglichen. Zwei unabhängige Auswerter haben die Inzidenz der pAVK, die Bildqualität, Artefakte und die diagnostische Genauigkeit der DE-CTA in 1014 arteriellen Segmenten anhand axialer, kombinierter 80/140kVp Rekonstruktionen und 3 D Maximum-Intensitäts-Projektionen (MIP) nach automatischer Knochen- und Plaqueentfernung ausgewertet. Der Einfluss von Verkalkungen, der Bildqualität und von -artefakten auf die diagnostische Genauigkeit wurde mittels Fisher Tests evaluiert. Darüber hinaus wurde die Übereinstimmung der Auswerter analysiert.

Ergebnisse Die zwei Auswerter erzielten Sensitivitätswerte von 98,0 % und 93,9 %, und Spezifitätswerte von 75,0 % und 66,7 % bei der Detektion von Stenosen > 50 %. Verkalkungen beeinflussten die Spezifität negativ, z. B. von 81,2 % auf 46,2 % bei Auswerter 1 (p < 0,001). Die Spezifität nahm bei besserer Bildqualität signifikant zu, z. B. von 70,0 % auf 76,4 % bei Auswerter 1 (p < 0,001). Artefakte reduzierten die Spezifität von Auswerter 2 signifikant (p < 0,001). Die Übereinstimmung der Auswerter war moderat bis substanziell bei der Stenosedetektion und Kalkplaqueauswertung.

Schlussfolgerungen Die DE-CTA ermöglicht eine zuverlässige Detektion von > 50 %igen Stenosen bei Patienten mit symptomatischer pAVK. Kalzifizierte atherosklerotischen Plaques, die Bildqualität, -artefakte können die Spezifität negative beeinflussen.

Kernaussagen: 

  • Die Sensitivitätswerte (DE-CTA) waren 98,0 und 93.9 %, die Spezifitätswerte 75,0 % und 66,7 %.

  • Die Auswerterübereinstimmg war moderat bis substanziell für die Stenose- und Plaquedetektion.

  • Kalkplaques, Bildqualität und Artefakte können die Spezifität beeinträchtigen.

Key words

vascular - CT angiography - dual-energy computed tomography angiography - peripheral artery occlusive disease - critical limb ischemia
 

  • References

  • 1 Huppert P. Tacke J. Lawall H. S3 guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Radiologe 2010; 50: 7-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Norgren L. Hiatt WR. Dormandy JA. et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease. Int Angiol 2007; 26: 81-157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ortiz D. Jahangir A. Singh M. et al. Access Site Complications After Peripheral Vascular Interventions Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 821-828
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Napoli A. Anzidei M. Zaccagna F. et al. Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Diagnostic Performance and Effect on Therapeutic Management of 64-Section CT Angiography. Radiology 2011; 261: 976-986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Heijenbrok-Kal MH. Kock MCJM. Hunink MGM. Lower extremity arterial disease: multidetector CT angiography meta-analysis. Radiology 2007; 245: 433-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Met R. Bipat S. Legemate DA. et al. Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 2009; 301: 415-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Meyer BC. Werncke T. Foert E. et al. Do the cardiovascular risk profile and the degree of arterial wall calcification influence the performance of MDCT angiography of lower extremity arteries?. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 497-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Johnson TRC. Krauss B. Sedlmair M. et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1510-1517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Henzler T. Gruettner J. Meyer M. et al. Coronary computed tomography and triple rule out CT in patients with acute chest pain and an intermediate cardiac risk for acute coronary syndrome: Part 2: Economic aspects. European Journal of Radiology 2013; 82: 106-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fontaine R. Kim M. Kieny R. Surgical treatment of peripheral circulation disorders. Helv Chir Acta 1954; 21: 499-533
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Landis JR. Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Brockmann C. Jochum S. Sadick M. et al. Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32: 630-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kau T. Eicher W. Reiterer C. et al. Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease-accuracy of maximum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1677-1686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Miller JM. Rochitte CE. Dewey M. et al. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography by 64-Row CT. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2324-2336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Duan Y. Wang X. Yang X. et al. Diagnostic Efficiency of Low-Dose CT Angiography Compared With Conventional Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Occlusions. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: W906-W914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sun Z. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2006; 17: 1915-1921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shareghi S. Gopal A. Gul K. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of 64 Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography in Peripheral Vascular Disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 23-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fotiadis N. Kyriakides C. Bent C. et al. 64-section CT angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and severe claudication: Comparison with digital subtractive angiography. Clin Radiol 2011; 66: 945-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Baxa J. Vendiš T. Moláček J. et al. Low contrast volume run-off CT angiography with optimized scan time based on double-level test bolus technique – feasibility study. European Journal of Radiology 2014; 83: e147-e155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Meyer BC. Oldenburg A. Frericks BB. et al. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the influence of different table feeds on visualization of peripheral arteries in CT angiography of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1546-1555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Meyer BC. Werncke T. Hopfenmüller W. et al. Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: Effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses. European Journal of Radiology 2008; 68: 414-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Almutairi A. Sun Z. Poovathumkadavi A. et al. Dual Energy CT Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Disease: Feasibility of Using Lower Contrast Medium Volume. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0139275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Solomon J. Wilson J. Samei E. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. Medical Physics 2015; 42: 4941-4953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Klink T. Obmann V. Heverhagen J. et al. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol. European Journal of Radiology 2014; 83: 1645-1654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Obmann VC. Klink T. Heverhagen JT. et al. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2015; 187: 372-379
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar