Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol 2017; 48(06): 540-549
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102802
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Therapie der ureteropelvinen Stenose im Erwachsenenalter

Treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adult age
Sandra Mühlstädt   *
1   Universitätsklinik für Urologie und Nierentransplantation Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle/Saale
,
Jennifer Kranz   *
2   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, St. Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen
,
Joachim A. Steffens
2   Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, St. Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen
,
Paolo Fornara
1   Universitätsklinik für Urologie und Nierentransplantation Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle/Saale
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 October 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die ureteropelvine Stenose, synonym Subpelvin- oder Nierenbeckenabgangsstenose, beschreibt eine Obstruktion im Bereich des pyeloureteralen Übergangs, in deren Folge eine renale Harnabflussstörung resultiert, die es zu behandeln gilt.

Seit der Erstbeschreibung der Pyeloplastik durch Trendelenburg 1886 und der erfolgreichen Etablierung durch Anderson und Hynes 1949 haben sich die Behandlungsstrategien der Nierenbeckenplastik vor allem in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten weiterentwickelt. Zwar gilt die offene Pyeloplastik nach wie vor als Goldstandard, doch wird diese heutzutage durch moderne minimal-invasive Techniken ergänzt. Dies inkludiert u. a. die laparoskopische Pyeloplastik, laparoskopische Single-Site Pyeloplastik, roboter-assistierte Pyeloplastik, roboter-assistierte Single-Site Pyeloplastik sowie die Endopyelotomie.

Dieser Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über die Therapie der ureteropelvinen Stenose sowie das Komplikationsmanagement der Pyeloplastik im Erwachsenenalter.

Abstract

Ureteropelvic stenosis, also known as ureteropelvic junction obstruction, is an obstruction in the region of the pyeloureteral junction resulting in a urinary discharge disorder of the renal pelvis, which requires treatment.

Since the first description of pyeloplasty by Trendelenburg in 1886 and the successful establishment of open pyeloplasty by Anderson and Hynes in 1949, the treatment strategies for ureteropelvic junction obstruction have developed considerably, especially in the last two decades. Although open pyeloplasty is still considered to be the gold standard, this concept is supplemented by modern minimally-invasive techniques today. These include laparoscopic pyeloplasty, laparoscopic single-site pyeloplasty, robot-assisted pyeloplasty, robot-assisted single-site pyeloplasty, and endopyelotomy.

This article provides an overview of the different treatment strategies for ureteropelvic junction obstruction as well as the complication management of pyeloplasty in adult age.

Schlüsselwörter

Ureteropelvinstenose - Erwachsenenalter - Pyeloplastik - Komplikationen.

Keywords

Ureteropelvic stenosis - adult age - pyeloplasty - complications

* S. Mühlstädt und J. Kranz sind gleichberechtigte Erstautoren.


 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Khan F, Ahmed K, Lee N. et al. Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11: 629-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cohen B, Goldman SM, Kopilnick M. et al. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: its occurrence in 3 members of a single family. J Urol 1978; 120: 361-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Roarke MC, Sandler CM. Provocative imaging. Diuretic renography. Urol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 227-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Adam A, Smith GH. Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: are we all really on the same page?. ANZ J Surg 2016; 86: 143-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Strother MC, Mucksavage P. Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17: 39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ekin RG, Celik O, Ilbey YO. An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Cent European J Urol 2015; 68: 245-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A. et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 430-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Clements T, Raman JD. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Ther Adv Urol 2011; 3: 141-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lai WR, Stewart CA, Thomas R. From Endopyelotomy to Robotic Pyeloplasty: What a Safari!. J Endourol 2017; 31: 59-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wu AK, Tran TC, Sorensen MD. et al. Relative renal function does not improve after relieving chronic renal obstruction. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1540-1544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Harraz AM, Taha DE, Shalaby I. et al. Evaluation of factors predicting recoverability of renal function after pyeloplasty in adults. Urol Int 2014; 93: 403-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lam W, Fernando A, Issa R. et al. Is routine postoperative diuresis renography indicated in all adult patients after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction?. Urology 2015; 85: 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by plastic operation. Br J Urol 1949; 21: 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Foley FE. A new plastic operation for stricture at the uretero-pelvic junction. Report of 20 operations. 1937. J Urol 2002; 167: 1075-1095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Culp OS, DeWeerd JH. A pelvic flap operation for certain types of ureteropelvic obstruction; preliminary report. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 1951; 26: 483-488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Scardino PL, Prince CL. Vertical flap ureteropelvioplasty. South Med J 1953; 46: 325-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Steinbach F, Schuster F, Allhoff EP. Pyeloplastik nach Anderson und Hynes. In: Albers P, Heidenreich A. , Hrsg. Standardoperationen in der Urologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006: 33-40
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Göğüş C, Karamürsel T, Tokatli Z. et al. Long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in 180 adults in the era of endourologic procedures. Urol Int 2004; 73: 11-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S. et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001; 87: 287-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Memon MA, Biyabani SR, Ghirano R. et al. Is laparoscopic pyeloplasty a comparable option to treat Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)? A comparative study. J Pak Med Assoc 2016; 66: 324-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bratt CG, Aurell M, Nilsson S. Renal function in patients with hydronephrosis. Br J Urol 1977; 49: 249-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hanske J, Sanchez A, Schmid M. et al. Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database. World J Urol 2015; 33: 2107-2113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fornara P, Doehn C, Seyfarth M. et al. Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive?. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 241-250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wagner S, Greco F, Inferrera A. et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and results in 105 patients. World J Urol 2010; 28: 615-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV. et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-1799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G. et al. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 2002; 60: 509-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Davis DM. Intubated ureterotomy: A new operation for ureteral and ureteropelvis stricture. J Surg Gynecol Obstet 1943; 76: 513-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hoda MR, Fornara P. Nephrectomy - pro laparoscopic. Urologe A 2012; 51: 658-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Amón Sesmero JH, Delgado MC, de la Cruz MB. et al. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Always Dismembered?. J Endourol 2016; 30: 778-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Haga N, Sato Y, Ogawa S. et al. Laparoscopic modified bypass pyeloplasty: a simple procedure for straightforward ureteral spatulation and intracorporeal suturing. Int Urol Nephrol 2015; 47: 1933-1938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Szydełko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W. et al. Clavien classification of complications after 150 laparoscopic pyeloplasties. Urology 2011; 77: 1359-1364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Shao P, Qin C, Ju X. et al. Comparison of two different suture methods in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urol Int 2011; 87: 304-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Maynes LJ, Levin BM, Webster TM. et al. Measuring the true success of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2008; 22: 1193-1198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gargouri MM, Nouira Y, Kallel Y. et al. The long-term results of laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty in adults. Arab J Urol 2013; 11: 411-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hanske J, Sanchez A, Schmid M. et al. Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database. World J Urol 2015; 33: 2107-2113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kaouk JH, Hafron J, Parekattil S. et al. Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results. J Endourol 2008; 22: 2153-2139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cestari A, Buffi NM, Lista G. et al. Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty in adults: techniques and results. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 711-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sivaraman A, Leveillee RJ, Patel MB. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A multi-institutional experience. Urology 2012; 79: 351-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Niver BE, Agalliu I, Bareket R. et al. Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases. Urology 2012; 79: 689-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Traumann M, Kluth LA, Schmid M. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty. Urologe A 2015; 54: 703-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wickham JE, Kellet MJ. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur Urol 1983; 9: 122-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bagley DH, Huffman J, Lyon E. et al. Endoscopic ureteropyelostomy: opening the obliterated ureteropelvic junction with nephroscopy and flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol 1985; 133: 462-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM. et al. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. J Endourol 2006; 20: 707-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Knudsen BE, Cook AJ, Watterson JD. et al. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. Urology 2004; 63: 230-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Mendez-Torres FR, Urena R, Thomas R. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 99-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Gupta M, Tuncay OL, Smith AD. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective. J Urol 1997; 157: 1613-1618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hinman F. Calicoureterostomy. In: Hinman F. , Hrsg. Atlas of Urologic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1989: 688
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Steffens J, Humke U, Haben B. et al. Open ureterocalycostomy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 397-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Mesrobian HG, Kelalis PP. Ureterocalicostomy: Indications and results in 21 patients. J Urol 1989; 142: 1285-1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Ghoneim MA, Ali-El-Dein B. Replacing the ureter by an ileal tube, using the Yang-Monti procedure. BJU Int 2005; 95: 455-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C. et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2004; 172: 2308-2311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Park J, Kim WS, Hong B. et al. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Urol 2008; 15: 490-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Ng CS, Yost AJ, Streem SB. Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience. Urology 2003; 61: 291-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar