Int J Sports Med 2017; 38(06): 456-461
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102945
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Accuracy of Cycling Power Meters against a Mathematical Model of Treadmill Cycling

Thomas Maier1, Lucas Schmid1, Beat Müller1, Thomas Steiner1, Jon Peter Wehrlin1
  • 1Section for Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen, Switzerland
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 19 January 2017

Publication Date:
08 May 2017 (eFirst)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy among a high number of current mobile cycling power meters used by elite and recreational cyclists against a first principle-based mathematical model of treadmill cycling. 54 power meters from 9 manufacturers used by 32 cyclists were calibrated. While the cyclist coasted downhill on a motorised treadmill, a back-pulling system was adjusted to counter the downhill force. The system was then loaded 3 times with 4 different masses while the cyclist pedalled to keep his position. The mean deviation (trueness) to the model and coefficient of variation (precision) were analysed. The mean deviations of the power meters were –0.9±3.2% (mean±SD) with 6 power meters deviating by more than±5%. The coefficients of variation of the power meters were 1.2±0.9% (mean±SD), with Stages varying more than SRM (p<0.001) and PowerTap (p<0.001). In conclusion, current power meters used by elite and recreational cyclists vary considerably in their trueness; precision is generally high but differs between manufacturers. Calibrating and adjusting the trueness of every power meter against a first principle-based reference is advised for accurate measurements.