Psychiatr Prax 2018; 45(06): 314-320
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-104504
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Self-Stigma of Depression Scale SSDS – Evaluation der deutschen Skalenversion

Self-Stigma of Depression Scale SSDS – Evaluation of the German Version
Anna Christin Makowski
Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
,
Eva E. Mnich
Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
,
Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 May 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Erstmalig werden die Anwendbarkeit und psychometrische Charakteristika einer deutschen Version der Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS) getestet.

Methodik Basis ist eine bundesweite Befragung (N = 2013). Die 16 Items der SSDS wurden in einer Hauptkomponentenanalyse untersucht.

Ergebnisse Es ergaben sich 3 Subskalen („soziale Unzulänglichkeit“, „Hemmungen bei der Hilfesuche“, „eigene Schuldzuschreibung“). Die Gesamtskala und die ersten beiden Subskalen weisen akzeptable Reliabilitäten auf.

Schlussfolgerungen Selbststigma ist als ein mehrdimensionales Konstrukt aufzufassen. Eine Weiterentwicklung der Skala wird empfohlen.

Abstract

Objectives A better understanding of self-stigma facilitates the development and evaluation of anti-stigma measures. In this study, the Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS) is applied for the first time in Germany. The focus lies on feasibility and psychometric characteristics of the scale.

Methods Data stem from a representative population survey in Germany (N = 2,013). The 16 items of the original SSDS are used to assess anticipated self-stigma in case of depression. Main component analysis is applied to analyze the factor structure.

Results The original version of the SDSS could not be replicated in the German sample. Instead of four, three factors emerged in the German version. They are similar to three subscales of the original SSDS: “social inadequacy”, “help-seeking inhibition” and “self-blame”. The internal reliability of the total scale as well as of the first two subscales is acceptable.

Conclusion SSDS is a multidimensional construct and can serve as an important instrument in research regarding self-stigma of depression in Germany. A further development of the German scale is recommended in order to gain greater insight into the nature of (anticipated) depression self-stigma.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Corrigan PW, Watson AC. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry 2000; 1: 16-20
  • 2 Livingston JD, Boyd JE. Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71: 2150-2161
  • 3 Angermeyer MC, Dietrich S. Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: A review of population studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006; 113: 163-179
  • 4 Corrigan PW, Rao D. On the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness: Stages, Diclosure, and Strategies for Change. Can J Psychiatry 2013; 57: 464-469
  • 5 Corrigan PW, Larson JE, Rüsch N. Self-stigma and the „why try“ effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry 2009; 8: 75-81
  • 6 Vogel DL, Wade NG, Haake S. Measuring the self-stigma associated with seeking psychological help. J Couns Psychol 2006; 53: 325-337
  • 7 Markowitz FE. Modeling Processes in Recovery from Mental Illness: Relationships between Symptoms, Life Satisfaction, and Self-Concept. J Health Soc Behav 2001; 42: 64-79
  • 8 Conner KO, Copeland VC, Grote NK. et al. Mental Health Treatment Seeking Among Older Adults with Depression: The Impact of Stigma and Race. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18: 531-543
  • 9 Dinos S, Stevens S, Serfaty M. et al. Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 184: 176-181
  • 10 Schreiber R, Hartrick G. Keeping It Together: How Women Use the Biomedical Explanatory Model To Manage the Stigma of Depression. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2002; 23: 91-105
  • 11 Lin E, Parikh SV. Sociodemographic, clinical, and attitudinal characteristics of the untreated depressed in Ontario. J Affect Disord 1999; 53: 153-162
  • 12 Link BG, Yang LH, Phelan JC. et al. Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 511-541
  • 13 Brohan E, Slade M, Clement S. et al. Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: a review of measures. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 80
  • 14 Ritsher JB, Otilingam PG, Grajales M. Internalized stigma of mental illness: Psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Res 2003; 121: 31-49
  • 15 Sibitz I, Friedrich ME, Unger A. et al. Internalized Stigma of Schizophrenia: Validation of the German Version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness-Scale (ISMI). Psychiat Prax 2013; 40: 83-91
  • 16 Corrigan PW, Watson AC, Barr L. The Self-Stigma of Mental Illness: Implications for Self-Esteem and Self- Efficacy. J Soc Clin Psychol 2006; 25: 875-884
  • 17 King M, Dinos S, Shaw J. et al. The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness. Brit J Psychiat 2007; 190: 248-254
  • 18 Kanter JW, Rusch LC, Brondino MJ. Depression Self-Stigma. J Nerv Ment Dis 2008; 196: 663-670
  • 19 Watson AC, Corrigan P, Larson JE. et al. Self-Stigma in People With Mental Illness. Schizophr Bull 2008; 33: 1312-1318
  • 20 Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. et al. The Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SDSS): development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010; 19: 243-254
  • 21 Gabler S, Häder S. Hrsg. Telefonstichproben. Methodische Innovationen und Anwendungen in Deutschland. Münster: Waxmann Verlag; 2002
  • 22 Kish L. A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. J Am Stat Assoc 1949; 44: 380-387
  • 23 von dem Knesebeck O, Kofahl C, Makowski AC. Differences in depression stigma towards ethnic and socio-economic groups in Germany – exploring the hypothesis of double stigma. J Affect Disord 2016; 208: 82-86
  • 24 Stevens JP. ed. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002
  • 25 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. eds. Using Multivariate Statistics. Essex: Pearson Education Limited; 2014
  • 26 Jaber R, Farroukh M, Ismail M. et al. Measuring depression and stigma towards depression and mental health treatment among adolescents in an Arab-American community. Int J Cult Ment Health 2015; 8: 247-254
  • 27 Busby Grant J, Bruce CP, Batterham PJ. Predictors of personal, perceived and self-stigma towards anxiety and depression. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2016; 25: 247-254
  • 28 Schlinzig T, Schneiderat G. Möglichkeiten zur Erhöhung der Teilnahmebereitschaft bei Telefonumfragen über Festnetz und Mobilfunk. In: Weichbold M, Bacher J, Wolf C. Hrsg. Umfrageforschung Herausforderungen und Grenzen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2009: 21-43
  • 29 Crisp A, Gelder M, Goddard E. et al. Stigmatization of people with mental illnesses: a follow-up study within the Changing Minds campaign of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. World Psychiatry 2005; 4: 106-113
  • 30 Makowski AC, Mnich EE, Ludwig J. et al. Changes in beliefs and attitudes toward people with depression and schizophrenia – results of a public campaign in Germany. Psychiatry Res 2016; 237: 271-278