PDF herunterladen
Die Wirbelsäule 2017; 01(03): 203-218
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110064
CME-Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Intraoperatives neurophysiologisches Monitoring (IOM) in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie

Ehab Shiban
,
Bernhard Meyer
,
Michael Stoffel
,
Martin Weinzierl
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. August 2017 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Um die Sicherheit durch intraoperative Evaluierung der funktionellen Integrität der unterschiedlichen neuroanatomischen Systeme zu erhöhen, wird in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie vermehrt ein intraoperatives neurophysiologisches Monitoring (IOM) eingesetzt. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Indikationen sowie die Vor- und Nachteile der einzelnen Modalitäten. Ein Algorithmus zur Unterscheidung echter, also pathophysiologisch relevanter Veränderungen und Artefaktmessungen wird vorgestellt, und Voraussetzungen für die erfolgreiche Anwendung werden diskutiert.

Schlüsselwörter

Wirbelsäuleneingriff - neurologisches Defizit - motorisch evozierte Potenziale (MEP) - somatosensorisch evozierte Potenziale (SSEP)
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Nash Jr CL , Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA. et al. Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 100-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Luders H. et al. Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 22-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 1993; 32: 219-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J. et al. Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 335-43 ; discussion 43-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Weinzierl MR, Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM. et al. Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30: 109-16 ; discussion 116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M. et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 1082-1091
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gonzalez AA, Jeyanandarajan D, Hansen C. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 27: E6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC. et al. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: S37-S46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lall RR, Lall RR, Hauptman JS. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33: E10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sloan TB, Heyer EJ. Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19: 430-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Seyal M, Mull B. Mechanisms of signal change during intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19: 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG. et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 6-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Calancie B, Harris W, Broton JG. et al. „Threshold-level“ multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Neurosurg 1998; 88: 457-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journee H. et al. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 1043-1050
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V. et al. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1248-1253
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP. et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2440-2449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hsu B, Cree AK, Lagopoulos J. et al. Transcranial motor-evoked potentials combined with response recording through compound muscle action potential as the sole modality of spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 1100-1106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Feng B, Qiu G, Shen J. et al. Impact of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spine deformity and potential risk factors for neurological monitoring changes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25: E108-E114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lewis SJ, Gray R, Holmes LM. et al. Neurophysiological changes in deformity correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with intraoperative skull-femoral traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 1627-1238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Vommaro F. et al. Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory (SSEPs) and transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (tce-MEPs) during surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis in patients with central or peripheral nervous system diseases. Eur Spine J 2015; Suppl 7 24 : 931-936
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bhagat S, Durst A, Grover H. et al. An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations. Eur Spine J 2015; 24: 1399-1407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Raynor BL, Padberg AM, Lenke LG. et al. Failure of intraoperative monitoring to detect postoperative neurologic deficits: a 25-year experience in 12,375 spinal surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41: 1387-1393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19: 416-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kothbauer KF, Deletis V, Epstein FJ. Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurg Focus 1998; 4: e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E. et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 1129-43 ; discussion 1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jimenez JC, Sani S, Braverman B. et al. Palsies of the fifth cervical nerve root after cervical decompression: prevention using continuous intraoperative electromyography monitoring. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 92-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bose B, Sestokas AK, Schwartz DM. Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 381-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gunnarsson T, Krassioukov AV, Sarjeant R. et al. Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 677-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Quraishi NA, Lewis SJ, Kelleher MO. et al. Intraoperative multimodality monitoring in adult spinal deformity: analysis of a prospective series of one hundred two cases with independent evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1504-1512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Traynelis VC, Abode-Iyamah KO, Leick KM. et al. Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 107-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fehlings MG, Smith JS, Kopjar B. et al. Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 425-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Resnick DK, Anderson PA, Kaiser MG. et al. Electrophysiological monitoring during surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 245-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Fan D, Schwartz DM, Vaccaro AR. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2499-2502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sharan A, Groff MW, Dailey AT. et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21: 102-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Parker SL, Amin AG, Farber SH. et al. Ability of electromyographic monitoring to determine the presence of malpositioned pedicle screws in the lumbosacral spine: analysis of 2450 consecutively placed screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15: 130-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Yaylali I, Ju H, Yoo J. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 31: 352-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA. et al. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 1218-1228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ney JP, van der Goes DN, Nuwer MR. Does intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring matter in noncomplex spine surgeries?. Neurology 2015; 85: 2151-2158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ney JP, van der Goes DN, Watanabe JH. Cost-benefit analysis: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgeries. J Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 30: 280-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sutter M, Eggspuehler A, Grob D. et al. The validity of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) in surgery of 109 spine and spinal cord tumors. Eur Spine J 2007; Suppl 2 16 : S197-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ghadirpour R, Nasi D, Iaccarino C. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intradural extramedullary tumors: why not?. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 130: 140-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Pang D, Wilberger Jr JE . Tethered cord syndrome in adults. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 32-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sala F, Manganotti P, Grossauer S. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach. Childs Nerv Syst 2010; 26: 473-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Pang D, Zovickian J, Moes GS. Retained medullary cord in humans: late arrest of secondary neurulation. Neurosurgery 2011; 68: 1500-1519 ; discussion 1519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Skinner SA, Vodusek DB. Intraoperative recording of the bulbocavernosus reflex. J Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 31: 313-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Grundy BL. Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials during neurosurgical operations: methods and applications. Neurosurgery 1982; 11: 556-575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kothbauer K, Schmid UD, Seiler RW. et al. Intraoperative motor and sensory monitoring of the cauda equina. Neurosurgery 1994; 34: 702-707 ; discussion 707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Romstock J, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R. Continuous electromyography monitoring of motor cranial nerves during cerebellopontine angle surgery. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 586-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Eager M, Shimer A, Jahangiri FR. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM): lessons learned from 32 case events in 2069 spine cases. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2011; 51: 247-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar