Rofo 2017; 189(09): 855-863
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111598
Abdomen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Value of Contrast Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Andrea Goetz
1   University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Radiology, Regensburg, Germany
,
Natascha Platz Batista da Silva
1   University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Radiology, Regensburg, Germany
,
Christian Moser
2   Clinic Bogenhausen, Munich, Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Minimally-Invasice Surgery, Munich, Germany
,
Ayman Agha
2   Clinic Bogenhausen, Munich, Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Minimally-Invasice Surgery, Munich, Germany
,
Lena-Marie Dendl
1   University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Radiology, Regensburg, Germany
,
Christian Stroszczynski
1   University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Radiology, Regensburg, Germany
,
Andreas G. Schreyer
1   University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Radiology, Regensburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 December 2016

24 April 2017

Publication Date:
23 August 2017 (online)

Abstract

Purpose To determine the value of routine contrast enema of loop ileostomy before elective ileostomy closure regarding the influence on the clinical decision-making.

Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of contrast enemas at a tertiary care center between 2005 und 2011. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I with ileostomy reversal, group II without ileostomy closure. Patient-related parameters (underlying disease, operation method) and parameters based on the findings (stenosis, leakage of anastomosis, incontinence) were evaluated.

Results Analyzing a total of 252 patients in 89 % (group I, n = 225) ileostomy closure was performed. In 15 % the radiologic report was the only diagnostic modality needed for therapy decision; in 36 % the contrast enema and one or more other diagnostic methods were decisive. In 36 % the radiological report of the contrast imaging was not relevant for decision at all. In 11 % (group II, n = 27) no ileostomy closure was performed. In this group in 11 % the radiological report of the contrast enema was the only decision factor for not performing the ileostomy reversal. In 26 % one or more examination was necessary. In 26 % the result of the contrast examination was not relevant.

Conclusion The radiologic contrast imaging of loop ileostomy solely plays a minor role in complex surgical decision-making before planned reversal, but is important as first imaging method in detecting complications and often leads to additional examinations.

Key points

  • Contrast enema of loop ileostomy before planned ileostomy closure is a frequently performed examination.

  • There exist no general guidelines that give further recommendations on decision-making planning ileostomy closure.

  • The radiologic contrast imaging of loop ileostomy solely plays a minor role in decision-making before planned reversal, but is important as first imaging method.

Citation Format

  • Goetz A, da Silva NP, Moser C et al. Clinical Value of Contrast Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 855 – 863

 
  • References

  • 1 Dimitriou N, Panteleimonitis S, Dhillon A. et al. Is the routine use of a water-soluble contrast enema prior to closure of a loop ileostomy necessary? A review of a single institution experience. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 331
  • 2 da Silva GM, Wexner SD, Gurland B. et al. Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary?. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2004; 6: 117-120
  • 3 Hong SY, Kim do Y, Oh SY. et al. Routine barium enema prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy is not necessary. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2012; 83: 88-91
  • 4 Kalady MF, Mantyh CR, Petrofski J. et al. Routine contrast imaging of low pelvic anastomosis prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy: is it necessary?. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2008; 12: 1227-1231
  • 5 Khair G, Alhamarneh O, Avery J. et al. Routine use of gastrograffin enema prior to the reversal of a loop ileostomy. Digestive surgery 2007; 24: 338-341
  • 6 Hoffmann JC, Zeitz M. Standard therapy of Crohn disease. Consensus-based recommendations. Der Internist 2002; 43: 1379-1385
  • 7 Hart D, Wall BF. UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 2004; 50: 285-291
  • 8 Thoeni RF, Fell SC, Engelstad B. et al. Ileoanal pouches: comparison of CT, scintigraphy, and contrast enemas for diagnosing postsurgical complications. Am J Roentgenol American journal of roentgenology 1990; 154: 73-78
  • 9 Cowan T, Hill AG. Ileostomy closure without contrast study is safe in selected patients. ANZ journal of surgery 2005; 75: 218-219
  • 10 Lawal TA, Falcone RA, von Allmen D. et al. The utility of routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal in children and adolescents following ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Journal of pediatric surgery 2011; 46: 1222-1225
  • 11 Hrung JM, Levine MS, Rombeau JL. et al. Total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch: the role of contrast studies for evaluating postoperative leaks. Abdominal imaging 1998; 23: 375-379
  • 12 Stadelmaier U, Bittorf R, Meyer M. et al. Can continence function after rectal resection be prognostically estimated?. Chirurg  2000; 71: 932-938
  • 13 Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. Diagnostische Referenzwerte für CT-Untersuchungen an Erwachsenen. Juli. 2015
  • 14 Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 2010; 257: 158-166
  • 15 Hirofuji Y, Aoyama T, Koyama S. et al. Evaluation of patient dose for barium enemas and CT colonography in Japan. Br J Radiol  2009; 82: 219-227