Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2017; 142(19): 1453-1460
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-115777
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das Adenokarzinom des Ösophagus – Bestandsaufnahme einer drastisch zunehmenden Erkrankung

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma – Appraisal of a Rapidly Increasing Disease
Jens Hoeppner
1   Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie – Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
6   Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
,
Torben Glatz
1   Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie – Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
6   Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
,
Rainer Claus
2   Klinik für Innere Medizin I – Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
6   Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
,
Andreas Fischer
3   Klinik für Innere Medizin II – Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
6   Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
,
Klaus Kraywinkel
4   Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten – Robert Koch-Institut – Berlin
,
Thomas Brunner
5   Klinik für Strahlentherapie – Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
6   Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 September 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Das Adenokarzinom des Ösophagus ist eine der am stärksten zunehmenden Tumorentitäten in der westlichen Welt. Seine Inzidenz hat sich seit 1991 in Deutschland mehr als versiebenfacht. Die bedeutendsten Risikofaktoren stellen die gastroösophageale Refluxerkrankung und die Adipositas dar. Die endoskopische Resektion ist ein effektives Verfahren für die Diagnostik und die kurative Therapie der Frühkarzinome. Die Ösophagusresektion ist die zentrale kurative Therapiemodalität für mucosa-überschreitende und nicht-metastasierte Tumorstadien. Neoadjuvante radiochemotherapeutische und perioperativ chemotherapeutische Behandlungsprotokolle kommen zunehmend zum Einsatz. Die onkologische Prognose für lokal fortgeschrittene Tumorstadien konnte auf 5- Jahresüberlebensraten von 50 % verbessert werden.

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is dramatically increasing in several Western countries. In Germany, the incidence increased by sevenfold since 1991. The most important risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma are gastroesophageal reflux and obesity. Early diagnosis is possible within surveillance programs for Barrett metaplasia. Endoscopic resection is effective for diagnosis and curative treatment of early carcinoma. Esophagectomy is the central curative treatment modality for non-metastasized tumors exceeding the mucosal layer. Both neoadjuvant chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy are increasingly applied. Long term prognosis for locally advanced tumors improved to nearly 50 % five year survival.

Schlüsselwörter

Ösophaguskarzinom - Adenokarzinom - Epidemiologie - Endoskopie - Chirurgie

Key words

esophageal cancer - adenocarcinoma - epidemiology - endoscopy - surgery
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 19; 97 (02) 142-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lada MJ, Nieman DR, Han M. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, proton-pump inhibitor use and Barrett's esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: Trends revisited. Surgery 2013; 154 (04) 856-864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rubenstein JH, Taylor JB. Meta-analysis: the association of oesophageal adenocarcinoma with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 1222-1227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 de Jonge PJ, van Blankenstein M, Looman CW. et al. Risk of malignant progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus: a Dutch nationwide cohort study. Gut 2010; 59 (08) 1030-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM. et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (15) 1375-1383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ronkainen J, Pertti A, Storskrubb T. et al. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1825-1831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kubo A, Corley DA. Body mass index and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 872-878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 199-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Steffen A, Huerta JM, Weiderpass E. et al. General and abdominal obesity and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer 2015; 137 (03) 646-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cook MB, Kamangar F, Whiteman DC. et al. Cigarette smoking and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: a pooled analysis from the international BEACON consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102 (17) 1344-1353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tramacere I, Pelucchi C, Bagnardi V. et al. A meta-analysis on alcohol drinking and esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma risk. Ann Oncol 2012; 23 (02) 287-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Xie FJ, Zhang YP, Zheng QQ. et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and esophageal cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 6098-6107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fischbach LA, Graham DY, Kramer JR. et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori and Barrett’s esophagus: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 357-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Orloff M, Peterson C, He X. et al. Germline mutations in MSR1, ASCC1, and CTHRC1 in patients with Barrett esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. JAMA 2011; 306: 410-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Levine DM, Ek WE, Zhang R. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1487-1493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Singh S, Garg SK, Singh PP. et al. Acid-suppressive medications and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's oesophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2014; 63 (08) 1229-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Corey KE, Schmitz SM, Shaheen NJ. Does a surgical antireflux procedure decrease the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98 (11) 2390-2394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Liao LM, Vaughan TL, Corley DA. et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use reduces risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction in a pooled analysis. Gastroenterology 2012; 142 (03) 442-452.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Das D, Chilton AP, Jankowski JA. Chemoprevention of oesophageal cancer and the AspECT trial. Recent Results Cancer Res 2009; 181: 161-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Koop H, Fuchs KH, Labenz J. et al. Mitarbeiter der Leitliniengruppe. [S2k guideline: gastroesophageal reflux disease guided by the German Society of Gastroenterology: AWMF register no. 021–013]. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52 (11) 1299-1346
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 1998; 85 (11) 1457-1459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wittekind C. (Hrsg) TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 8. Aufl. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Pech O, Behrens A, May A. et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2008; 57: 1200-1206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG. et al. Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2008; 98 (03) 547-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dunbar KB, Spechler SJ. The risk of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107 (06) 850-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Keswani RN. et al. Treatment trends, risk of lymph node metastasis, and outcomes for localized esophageal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106 (07) dju133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pech O, May A, Manner H. et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 2014; 146 (03) 652-660
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Nentwich MF, von Loga K, Reeh M. et al. Depth of submucosal tumor infiltration and its relevance in lymphatic metastasis formation for T1b squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18 (02) 242-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mine S, Sano T, Hiki N. et al. Proximal margin length with transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (08) 1050-1054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Biere SS, van Berge HenegouwenMI. et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Glatz T, Marjanovic G, Zirlik K. et al. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: Evolution of management and prognosis over the last 3 decades. Chirurg 2015; 86 (07) 662-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ. et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (22) 2074-2084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM. et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradio-therapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 (07) 681-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP. et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (01) 11-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP. et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (13) 1715-1721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Homann N, Pauligk C, Luley K. et al. Pathological complete remission in patients with oesophagogastric cancer receiving preoperative 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel. Int J Cancer 2012; 130 (07) 1706-1713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hoeppner J, Zirlik K, Brunner T. et al. Multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: which regimen should we choose? Outcome analysis of perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation in 105 patients. J Surg Oncol 2014; 109 (03) 287-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hoeppner J, Lordick F, Brunner T. et al. ESOPEC: prospective randomized controlled multicenter phase III trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT protocol) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS protocol) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (NCT02509286). BMC Cancer 2016; 16 (01) 503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Makowiec F, Baier P, Kulemann B. et al. Improved long-term survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: influence of epidemiologic shift and neoadjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17 (07) 1193-1201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar