Int J Sports Med 2017; 38(12): 883-889
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116671
Physiology & Biochemistry
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Cardiovascular Responses to Resistance Exercise Performed with Large and Small Muscle Mass

Lenifran Matos-Santos
1   Physical Activity Sciences Graduate Program, Salgado de Oliveira University, Niterói, Brasil
2   Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Rio de Janeiro State Unversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Paulo Farinatti
1   Physical Activity Sciences Graduate Program, Salgado de Oliveira University, Niterói, Brasil
2   Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Rio de Janeiro State Unversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Juliana P. Borges
2   Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Rio de Janeiro State Unversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3   Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Investigation
,
Renato Massaferri
1   Physical Activity Sciences Graduate Program, Salgado de Oliveira University, Niterói, Brasil
2   Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Rio de Janeiro State Unversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Walace Monteiro
1   Physical Activity Sciences Graduate Program, Salgado de Oliveira University, Niterói, Brasil
2   Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Rio de Janeiro State Unversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 04 July 2017

Publication Date:
19 September 2017 (online)

Abstract

Prior research about the effects of the amount of exercised muscle mass upon cardiovascular responses (CVR) has neglected a potential bias related to total exercise and concentric/eccentric duration. Autonomic responses and perceived exertion (RPE) were compared in resistance exercises performed with larger and smaller muscle mass and matched for total exercise and concentric/eccentric duration. Twelve men performed 4 sets of 12 repetitions of unilateral (UNI) and bilateral (BIL) knee extensions at 70% of 12RM. Increases in CVR were always greater at the last set of BIL over UNI, as were SBP (35% vs. 23%), DBP (36% vs. 23%), HR (40% vs. 26%), RRP (90% vs 53%) and CO (55% vs 39%). No difference between protocols was found for autonomic modulation before and after exercise, but BIL induced significantly greater changes than UNI from baseline for R-R intervals (−13% vs. −7%), SDNN (−38% vs. −17%) and rMSSD (−41% vs. −21%). The rate of perceived exertion in the last set was higher in BIL than UNI (7.6±0.5 vs. 6.6±1.4 OMNI-RES; P<0.05) and did not correlate with any CVR. Thus, CVR were greater in resistance exercise performed with larger than smaller muscle mass. This information is relevant for patients with high cardiovascular risk.

 
  • References

  • 1 Abrantes C, Sampaio J, Reis V, Sousa N, Duarte J. Physiological responses to treadmill and cycle exercise. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 26-30
  • 2 Amann M, Blain G, Proctor L, Sebranek J, Pegelow D, Dempsey J. Group III and IV muscle afferents contribute to ventilatory and cardiovascular response to rhythmic exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 966-976
  • 3 Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
  • 4 Cafarelli E. Peripheral contributions to the perception of effort. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 382-389
  • 5 Chen CY, Bonham AC. Postexercise hypotension: central mechanisms. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2010; 38: 122-127
  • 6 Cunha FA, Midgley AW, Gonçalves T, Soares PP, Farinatti P. Parasympathetic reactivation after maximal CPET depends on exercise modality and resting vagal activity in healthy men. SpringerPlus 2015; 4: 1-9
  • 7 D’Assunção W, Daltro M, Simão R, Polito M, Monteiro W. Acute cardiovascular responses in strength training conducted in exercises for large and small muscular groups. Braz J Sport Med 2007; 13: 103-106
  • 8 Dampney R. Central neural control of the cardiovascular system: current perspectives. Adv Physiol Educ 2016; 40: 283-296
  • 9 de Morree H, Klein C, Marcora S. Perception of effort reflects central motor command during movement execution. Psychophysiology 2012; 49: 1242-1253
  • 10 Franke W, Boettger C, McLean S. Effects of varying central command and muscle mass on the cardiovascular responses to isometric exercise. Clin Physiol 2000; 20: 380-387
  • 11 Gálvez JM, Alonso JP, Sangrador LA, Navarro G. Effect of muscle mass and intensity of isometric contraction on heart rate. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 487-492
  • 12 Gomides RS, Dias RM, Souza DR, Costa LA, Ortega KC, Mion Jr D, Tinucci T, de Moraes Forjaz CL. Finger blood pressure during leg resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 590-595
  • 13 Harriss D, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
  • 14 Imholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: Assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 38: 605-616
  • 15 Jamison JP, Megarry J, Riley M. Exponential protocols for cardiopulmonary exercise testing on treadmill and cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 167-175
  • 16 Kübler W. Human cardiovascular control. Edited by Rowell LB. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993: 500 illustrated. Clin Cardiol 1994; 17: 98
  • 17 Lamotte M, Fleury F, Pirard M, Jamon A, van de Borne P. Acute cardiovascular response to resistance training during cardiac rehabilitation: Effect of repetition speed and rest periods. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 329-336
  • 18 MacDougall JD, Tuxen D, Sale DG, Moroz JR, Sutton JR. Arterial blood pressure response to heavy resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 1985; 58: 785-790
  • 19 Machado-Vidotti HG, Mendes RG, Simoes RP, Castello-Simoes V, Catai AM, Borghi-Silva A. Cardiac autonomic responses during upper versus lower limb resistance exercise in healthy elderly men. Braz J Phys Ther 2014; 18: 9-18
  • 20 Massaferri R, Matos-Santos L, Farinatti P, Monteiro WD. Hemodynamic responses and perceived exertion during continuous and discontinuous resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1052-1057
  • 21 Michelini LC, O'Leary DS, Raven PB, Nóbrega AC. Neural control of circulation and exercise: A translational approach disclosing interactions between central command, arterial baroreflex, and muscle metaboreflex. Am J Physiol 2015; 309: H381-H392
  • 22 Mitchell J, Payne F, Saltin B, Schibye B. The role of muscle mass in the cardiovascular response to static contractions. J Physiol 1980; 309: 45-54
  • 23 Monteiro WD, Souza DA, Rodrigues MN, Farinatti PTV. Respostas cardiovasculares agudas ao exercício de força realizado em três diferentes formas de execução. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2008; 14: 94-98
  • 24 Moreira OC, Faraci LL, de Matos DG, Mazini Filho ML, da Silva SF, Aidar FJ, Hickner RC, de Oliveira CE. Cardiovascular responses to unilateral, bilateral, and alternating limb resistance exercise performed using different body segments. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 644-652
  • 25 Naclerio F, Rodríguez-Romo G, Barriopedro-Moro MI, Jiménez A, Alvar BA, Triplett NT. Control of resistance training intensity by the OMNI perceived exertion scale. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 1879-1888
  • 26 Nunan D, Donovan G, Jakovljevic DG, Hodges LD, Sandercock GRH, Brodie DA. Validity and reliability of short-term heart-rate variability from the Polar S810. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 243-250
  • 27 Pinto RR, Polito MD. Haemodynamic responses during resistance exercise with blood flow restriction in hypertensive subjects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2016; 36: 407-413
  • 28 Polito MD, Rosa CC, Schardong P. Acute cardiovascular responses on knee extension at different performance modes. Braz J Sport Med 2004; 10: 177-180
  • 29 Poton R, Polito MD. Hemodynamic response to resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction in healthy subjects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2016; 36: 231-236
  • 30 Potts J. Inhibitory neurotransmission in the nucleus tractus solitarii: implications for baroreflex resetting during exercise. Exp Physiol 2006; 91: 59-72
  • 31 Raven P, Fadel P, Ogoh S. Arterial baroreflex resetting during exercise: a current perspective. Exp Physiol 2006; 91: 37-49
  • 32 Ray CA, Carter JR. Central modulation of exercise-induced muscle pain in humans. J Physiol 2007; 585: 287-294
  • 33 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J, Frazee K, Dube J, Andreacci J. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 333-341
  • 34 Saleh T, Connell B. Role of the insular cortex in the modulation of baroreflex sensitivity. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: R1417-R1424
  • 35 Smith S, Mitchell J, Garry M. The mammalian exercise pressor reflex in health and disease. Exp Physiol 2006; 91: 89-102
  • 36 Stebbins C, Walser B, Jafarzadeh M. Cardiovascular responses to static and dynamic contraction during comparable workloads in humans. Am J Physiol 2002; 283: R568-R575
  • 37 Victor RG, Secher NH, Lyson T, Mitchell JH. Central command increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity during intense intermittent isometric exercise in humans. Circ Res 1995; 76: 127-131
  • 38 Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, Amsterdam EA, Bittner V, Franklin BA, Gulanick M, Laing ST, Stewart KJ. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation 2007; 116: 572-584
  • 39 Williamson J, McColl R, Mathews D, Ginsburg M, Mitchell J. Activation of the insular cortex is affected by the intensity of exercise. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 1213-1219
  • 40 Williamson J, McColl R, Mathews D, Mitchell J, Raven P, Morgan W. Brain activation by central command during actual and imagined handgrip under hypnosis. J Appl Physiol 2002; 92: 1317-1324
  • 41 Williamson JW. The relevance of central command for the neural cardiovascular control of exercise. Exp Physiol 2010; 95: 1043-1048
  • 42 Williamson JW, Fadel PJ, Mitchell JH. New insights into central cardiovascular control during exercise in humans: a central command update. Exp Physiol 2006; 91: 51-58