Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2018; 39(03): 232-236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122152
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Outcome of Low-Invasive Local Split-Thickness Lengthening for Iliotibial Band Friction Syndrome

Hiroaki Inoue
1   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Kyoto, Japan
,
Kunio Hara
2   Japan Community Health care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Kyoto, Japan
,
Yuji Arai
3   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Sports and Para-Sport Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Shuji Nakagawa
3   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Sports and Para-Sport Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
,
Hiroyuki Kan
1   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Kyoto, Japan
,
Manabu Hino
1   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Kyoto, Japan
,
Hiroyoshi Fujiwara
1   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Kyoto, Japan
,
Toshikazu Kubo
1   Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Kyoto, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted 18 October 2017

Publication Date:
23 January 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Conventional surgical methods for iliotibial band friction syndrome (ITBFS) may affect the iliotibial band (ITB), delaying return to sports activities or impeding performance. We have developed a minimally invasive method. This study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of this procedure in individuals with ITBFS. This study included 34 knees of 31 individuals. Surgery involved lengthening the central part of the ITB by splitting it into a superficial and a deep layer, maintaining the anterior and posterior fibers immediately above the lateral epicondyle. Outcomes included time to resume sports activity, personal best times to run a 5000-m race before and after surgery, and 2-month post-surgery muscle strengths. The mean postoperative time to return to competition was 5.8 weeks. Personal best times of 5000-m race improved in 13 of 17 runners. Two months post-surgery, the mean extensor muscle strengths on the healthy and affected sides did not significantly differ nor did the flexor muscle strengths. In ITBFS, the ITB itself is normal. Lengthening the limited region of the ITB immediately above the lateral femoral epicondyle removes the cause of ITBFS, with a reduction in inflammation. This technique resulted in early return to competition without degrading performance.

Key words

iliotibial band - sports disorder - return to competition - surgery
 

  • References

  • 1 Cowden 3rd CH, Barber FA. Arthroscopic treatment of iliotibial band syndrome. Arthrosc Tech 2013; 19: e57-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Flato R, Passanante GJ, Skalski MR, Patel DB, White EA, Matcuk Jr. GR. The iliotibial tract: Imaging, anatomy, injuries, and other pathology. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46: 605-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fredericson M, Cookingham CL, Chaudhari AM, Dowdell BC, Oestreicher N, Sahrmann SA. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 2000; 10: 169-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gunter P, Schwellnus MP. Local corticosteroid injection in iliotibial band friction syndrome in runners: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 269-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gyaran IA, Spiezia F, Hudson Z, Maffulli N. Sonographic measurement of iliotibial band thickness: An observational study in healthy adult volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 458-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hariri S, Savidge ET, Reinold MM, Zachazewski J, Gill TJ. Treatment of recalcitrant iliotibial band friction syndrome with open iliotibial band bursectomy: Indications, technique, and clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 1417-1424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for Ethics in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2018 Update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Holms JC. Iliotibial band syndrome in cyclists. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 419-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lavine R. Iliotibial band friction syndrome. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2010; 20: 18-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lucas CA. Iliotibial band friction syndrome as exhibited in athletes. J Athl Train 1992; 27: 250-252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pinshaw R, Atlas V, Noakes TD. The nature and response to therapy of 196 consecutive injuries seen at a runners’ clinic. S Afr Med J 1984; 25: 291-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Richards DP, Alan Barber F, Troop RL. Iliotibial band Z-lengthening. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 326-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schwellnus MP, Theunissen L, Noakes TD, Reinach SG. Anti-inflammatory and combined anti-inflammatory/analgesic medication in the early management of iliotibial band friction syndrome: a clinical trial. S Afr Med J 1991; 79: 602-606
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stecco A, Gilliar W, Hill R, Fullerton B, Stecco C. The anatomical and functional relation between gluteus maximus and fascia lata. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2013; 17: 512-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Strauss EJ, Kim S, Calcei JG, Park D. Iliotibial band syndrome: Evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19: 728-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar