Download PDF
Klinische Neurophysiologie 2019; 50(01): 11-16
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124360
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die Ableitung olfaktorisch evozierter Potenziale in Patienten mit limbischer Enzephalitis

Olfactory Evoked Potentials in Patients with Limbic Encephalitis
Felix A. Schmidt
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
,
Lutz Harms
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
,
Harald Prüss
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
2   Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Berlin
,
Rohat Geran
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
,
Heidi Olze
3   Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
,
Matthew B. Maas
4   Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
,
Florian C. Uecker
3   Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie In dieser Studie wurde erstmals das Riechvermögen bei Patienten mit limbischer Enzephalitis (LE) mittels olfaktorisch evozierter Potenziale (OERP) untersucht.

Methodik Bei 19 LE Patienten (9 weibliche, 10 männliche Patienten, mittleres Alter 47 Jahre) und 19 gesunden Kotrollprobanden (GK) wurde das Riechvermögen mittels psychophysischer Schwellen-Diskrimination-Identifikations-Testung (SDI) und mittels OERPs bestimmt.

Ergebnisse 10 LE Pat. (53%) hatten eine Hyposmie, 2 Pat. (11%) eine funktionelle Anosmie und 7 Pat. (36%) waren normosmisch. Der SDI-Mittelwert±Standardabweichung betrug bei den LE-Patienten 27,3±6,7; bei den GK 34,7±2,2. Der SDI-Wert der LE Patienten war im Vergleich zu den GK signifikant vermindert (p<0,0001). Alle untersuchten Patienten mit eingeschränktem Riechvermögen zeigten pathologische OERPs.

Schlussfolgerung Riechstörungen konnten gehäuft bei LE Patienten nachgewiesen werden. Möglicherweise sind hierfür strukturelle Schädigungen des limbischen Systems, das an der Weiterverarbeitung von olfaktorischen Informationen beteiligt ist, ursächlich. Die Ableitung von OERPs erwies sich als geeignetes objektives Untersuchungsverfahren zur Detektion von Riechstörungen bei LE Patienten.

Abstract

Objective Limbic encephalitis (LE) refers to an inflammatory process localized to structures of the limbic system that causes different neurologic and psychiatric disorders. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the olfactory function with olfactory evoked potentials (OEP) of patients with paraneoplastic or autoimmune encephalitis.

Methods 19 LE patients (9 female, 10 male, mean age 47 years) and 19 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were tested. The Threshold Discrimination Identification test (TDI) was used to test orthonasal olfactory function. OEPs were recorded for objective olfactometry.

Results 10 LE patients (53%) were hyposmic, 2 patients anosmic (11%) and 7 patients normosmic (36%). Their mean TDI value±standard deviation was 27.3±6.7. All LE patients with olfactory dysfunction also showed pathological OEPs. All 19 HCs were normosmic with a mean TDI value of 34.7±2.2. There was a significant reduction of the LE patients’ TDI score compared to the HC (p<0.0001).

Conclusions Olfactory dysfunction seems to be a frequent symptom in LE patients. This might be due to structural changes of the limbic system. OEPs were a suitable method to detect olfactory dysfunction in these patients.

Schlüsselwörter

limbische Enzephalitis - Olfaktorisch Evozierte Potenziale - Riechtestung - Riechstörung

Key words

limbic encephalitis - olfactory evoked potentials - olfactory testing - olfactory dysfunction
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Dalmau J. NMDA receptor encephalitis and other antibody-mediated disorders of the synapse: The 2016 Cotzias Lecture. Neurology 2016; 87: 2471-2482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lemon CH, Katz DB. The neural processing of taste. BMC Neurosci 2007; 18: 5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Small DM. Central gustatory processing in humans. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 63: 191-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Uecker FC, Olze H, Kunte H. et al. Longitudinal testing of olfactory and gustatory function in patients with multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0170492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schmidt F, Göktas O, Harms L. et al. Structural correlates of taste and smell loss in encephalitis disseminata. PloS One 2011; 6: e19702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schmidt F, Göktas O, Jarius S. et al. Olfactory dysfunction in patients with neuromyelitis optica. Multiple Sclerosis International 2013; 2013: 654501
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Godoy MD, Voegels RL, Pinna Fde R. et al. Olfaction in neurologic and neurodegenerative diseases: a literature review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 19: 176-179
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Müller A, Mungersdorf M, Reichmann H. et al. Olfactory function in Parkinsonian syndromes. J Clin Neurosci 2002; 9: 521-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hummel T, Klimek L, Welge-Lüssen A. et al. Chemosensory evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of olfactory disorders. HNO 2000; 48: 481-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lorig TS. The application of electroencephalographic techniques to the study of human olfaction: a review and tutorial. Int J Psychophysiol 2000; 36: 91-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R. et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15: 391-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H. et al. Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 237-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hummel T, Kobal G. Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon SA, Nicolelis MAL. (eds) Methods and frontiers in chemosensory research. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC press; 2001: 429-464
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. S2k-Leitlinie. Riech- und Schmeckstörungen. 31.10.2016. URL:http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/017-050l_S2k_Riech-und-Schmeckstörungen_2017-03
    PubMed
  • 15 Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state exmanination: a comprehensive. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1992; 40: 922-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hautzinger M. The Beck Depression Inventory in clinical practice. Nervenarzt 1991; 62: 689-696
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beck AT, Steer RA. Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventories. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1984; 40: 1365-1367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. In: Stroke. 19, Nr. 5 1988; S 604–607
    PubMed
  • 19 Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ. Olfactory identification deficits in patients with focal cerebral excision. Neuropsychologia 1988; 26: 387-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Masaoka Y, Yoshimura N, Inoue M. et al. Impairment of odor recognition in Parkinson's disease caused by weak activations of the orbitofrontal cortex. Neurosci Lett 2007; 412: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stuck BA, Beule A, Damm M. et al. Positionspapier „Die chemosensorische Testung bei der gutachterlichen Abklärung von Riechstörungen“. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2014; 93: 327-329
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hummel T, Welge-Lüssen A. Riech- und Schmeckstörungen. 1. Auflage 2009. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag;
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Doty RL. The olfactory system and its disorders. Semin Neurol 2009; 29: 74-81
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wilson RS, Yu L, Schneider JA. et al. Lewy bodies and olfactory dysfunction in old age. Chem Senses. 2011; 36: 367-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Liss L, Gomez F. The nature of senile changes of the human olfactory bulb and tract. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1958; 67: 167-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Covington JW, Geisler MW, Polich J. et al. Normal aging and odor intensity effects on the olfactory event-related potential. Int J Psychophysiol 1999; 32: 205-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hummel T, Futschik T, Frasnelli J. et al. Effects of olfactory function, age, and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: a study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli. Toxicol Lett 2003; 140-141: 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Murphy C, Morgan CD, Geisler MW. et al. Olfactory event-related potentials and aging: normative data. Int J Psychophysiol 2000; 36: 133-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Doty RL, Kamath V. The influences of age on olfaction: a review. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 20
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Ohla K, Lundstrom JN. Sex differences in chemosensation: sensory or emotional?. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 607
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Morgan CD, Geisler MW, Covington JW. et al. Olfactory P3 in young and older adults. Psychophysiology 1999; 36: 281-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Olofsson JK, Nordin S. Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials. Chem Senses 2004; 29: 629-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lundström JN, Frasnelli J, Larsson M. et al. Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 2005; 57: 181-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jacob TJ, Fraser C, Wang L. et al. Psychophysical evaluation of responses to pleasant and mal-odour stimulation in human subjects; adaptation, dose response and gender differences. Int J Psychophysiol 2003; 48: 67-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Evans WJ, Cui L, Starr A. Olfactory event-related potentials in normal human subjects: effects of age and gender. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 95: 293-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Temmel AF, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B. et al. Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 635-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kohli P, Soler ZM, Nguyen SA. et al. The association between olfaction and depression: A systematic review. Chem Senses. 2016; 41: 479-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar