RSS-Feed abonnieren
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764377
Development and Validation of Palliative Care Bundle for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer “PALLICR”
Funding The research project was a funded project from UCOST, Dehradun with reference to letter no. UCS & T/R & D-03/20-21/19062.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00049561/202304/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0043-1764377_2170579-1.jpg)
Abstract
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00049561/202304/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0043-1764377-i2170579-5.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Background The aim of this study was to develop and validate a comprehensive palliative care bundle “PALLICR” for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients.
Materials and Methods The present study was an exploratory study with instrument validation design which was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India. A total of 25 advance cancer patients were selected using the purposive sampling technique.
Results The newly developed PALLICR bundle consists of six items under three subfactors, that is, functional recovery, resilience, and quality of life. The final version of bundle with six items of PALLICR bundle was validated and showed a good fit to provide palliative care to advanced GBC patients. Standardized scales, that is, palliative care outcome scale, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life scale for patients and caregiver strain index for caregivers were used for evaluation of PALLICR bundle effectiveness.
Conclusion PALLICR bundle is valid and reliable methods to provide palliative care to advanced GBC patients.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. April 2023
© 2023. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 WHO. Palliative care. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019
- 2 Clark J, Barnes A, Gardiner C. Reframing global palliative care advocacy for the sustainable development goal era: a qualitative study of the views of international palliative care experts. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56 (03) 363-370
- 3 Centeno C, Arias-Casais N. Global palliative care: from need to action. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7 (07) e815-e816
- 4 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68 (06) 394-424
- 5 Sharma G, Gupta S, Gupta A. et al. Identification of factors influencing delayed presentation of cancer patients. Int J Community Med Public Health 2020; 7 (05) 1705-1710
- 6 American Cancer Society. . Palliative Therapy for Gallbladder Cancer 2020. At: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/gallbladder-cancer/treating/palliative-therapy.html
- 7 Okamoto I, Wright D, Foster C. Impact of cancer on everyday life: a systematic appraisal of the research evidence. Health Expect 2012; 15 (01) 97-111
- 8 Kalyani CV, Sharma SK, Kusum K, Lijumol KJ. Healthcare-related quality of life and lived existential experiences among young adults diagnosed with cancer: a mixed-method study. Indian J Palliat Care 2020; 26 (01) 19-23
- 9 Nayak MG, George A, Vidyasagar MS. et al. Quality of life among cancer patients. Indian J Palliat Care 2017; 23 (04) 445-450
- 10 Care IAfHP. . 6 Principles of palliative care International Association for Hospice & Palliative Care; 2020. At: https://hospicecare.com/what-we-do/publications/getting-started/6-principles-of-palliative-care
- 11 Rugno FC, Carlo MM. The palliative outcome scale (POS) applied to clinical practice and research: an integrative review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2016; 24: e2764
- 12 T. Luckett. M. T. King, P. N. Butow, et al. Choosing between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G for measuring health-related qualityof life in cancer clinical research: issues, evidence and recommendations. Annals of Oncology 2011; 22: 2179-2190 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq721.
- 13 Sullivan MT. Caregiver Strain Index (CSI). Home Healthc Nurse 2003; 23 (03) 197-198
- 14 Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Person Psychol 1975; 28 (04) 563-575