Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2023; 40(01): 087-099
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764430
How I Do It

Percutaneous Creation of Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistula: Patient Selection and Ultrasound Mapping

Kedar G. Sharbidre
1   Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Lauren F. Alexander
2   Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
,
Alian Al-Balas
3   Department of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Michelle L. Robbin
1   Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Approximately, 550,000 patients with end-stage kidney disease rely on maintenance dialysis in the United States, and nearly 90% receive hemodialysis.[1] Providing hemodialysis requires a conduit to the bloodstream (vascular access) that can reliably deliver a high blood flow into the extracorporeal dialysis circuit. A surgical arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is created by a direct surgical anastomosis between a peripheral artery and vein. AVFs are considered the preferred type of vascular access, because they have better survival and require fewer interventions to maintain long-term patency for dialysis, once they are successfully cannulated for dialysis.[2] [3] [4]

A prerequisite for the successful cannulation of an AVF for dialysis is the progressive increase in the diameter and blood flow of the draining vein observed over the first 6 postoperative weeks.[5] This physiologic process, termed AVF maturation, fails to occur in a substantial proportion of surgical AVF (sAVF).[6] [7] Non-maturation of an sAVF may lead to subsequent interventions to promote maturation, which, when unsuccessful, results in sAVF abandonment.

Percutaneous AVF (pAVF) is a novel percutaneous technique for AVF creation, with several devices recently approved for use in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[8] [9] Surgically created AVFs typically have an up to 90-degree angle of the vein with the artery at the end-to-side anastomosis. Computational fluid dynamics suggest that an anastomotic angle of less than 30 degrees improves the flow hemodynamics, and pilot clinical data demonstrated that a smaller surgical anastomotic angle reduced juxta-anastomotic stenosis.[10] [11] [12] In contrast to the surgical technique, an endovascular approach potentially minimizes vascular injury at the time of AVF creation by creating a channel between the artery and vein with an angle approaching 0 degrees (side to side anastomosis). The narrower vein–artery angle in a pAVF provides a potential rationale for superior maturation, as compared with a sAVF. However, the creation of a pAVF requires several additional vascular measurements in addition to those needed for sAVF.

Percutaneous access creation requires a more extensive preprocedural sonographic evaluation of antecubital and upper forearm anatomy, not needed for sAVF creation. The following is a standardized method of sonographic mapping prior to surgical and percutaneous hemodialysis AVF creation, highlighting pertinent anatomic variations as well as technical and interpretive challenges.



Publication History

Article published online:
04 May 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Foley RN. et al. US Renal Data System 2020 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 77 (4, Suppl 1): A7-A8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Allon M. Current management of vascular access. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2 (04) 786-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Roy-Chaudhury P, Kelly BS, Melhem M. et al. Vascular access in hemodialysis: issues, management, and emerging concepts. Cardiol Clin 2005; 23 (03) 249-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Roy-Chaudhury P, Sukhatme VP, Cheung AK. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17 (04) 1112-1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Robbin ML, Greene T, Cheung AK. et al; Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study Group. Arteriovenous fistula development in the first 6 weeks after creation. Radiology 2016; 279 (02) 620-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dember LM, Beck GJ, Allon M. et al; Dialysis Access Consortium Study Group. Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299 (18) 2164-2171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Allon M, Imrey PB, Cheung AK. et al; Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation (HFM) Study Group. Relationships between clinical processes and arteriovenous fistula cannulation and maturation: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 71 (05) 677-689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rajan DK, Ebner A, Desai SB, Rios JM, Cohn WE. Percutaneous creation of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (04) 484-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hull JE, Jennings WC, Cooper RI, Waheed U, Schaefer ME, Narayan R. The pivotal multicenter trial of ultrasound-guided percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (02) 149-158.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Darcy M, Vachharajani N, Zhang T. et al. Long-term outcome of upper extremity arteriovenous fistula using pSLOT: single-center longitudinal follow-up using a protocol-based approach. J Vasc Access 2017; 18 (06) 515-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A. Disturbed flow in radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis: low and oscillating shear stress locates the sites of stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27 (01) 358-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shenoy S. Future trends in vascular access creation. Contrib Nephrol 2017; 189: 252-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Al-Balas A. Feasibility of creation of an endovascular arteriovenous fistula in patients undergoing preoperative vascular mapping. Presented in ASN Meeting. San Diego: 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wasse H, Alvarez AC, Brouwer-Maier D. et al. Patient selection, education, and cannulation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistulae: an ASDIN White Paper. J Vasc Access 2020; 21 (06) 810-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Popli K, Dittman JM, Amendola MF, Plum J, Newton DH. Anatomic suitability for commercially available percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation systems. J Vasc Surg 2021; 73 (03) 999-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hull JE, Elizondo-Riojas G, Bishop W, Voneida-Reyna YL. Thermal resistance anastomosis device for the percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (03) 380-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shahverdyan R, Beathard G, Mushtaq N, Litchfield TF, Nelson PR, Jennings WC. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous arteriovenous fistulae creation by Ellipsys and WavelinQ Devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (09) 1365-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lok CE, Rajan DK, Clement J. et al; NEAT Investigators. Endovascular proximal forearm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access: results of the Prospective, Multicenter Novel Endovascular Access Trial (NEAT). Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 70 (04) 486-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Allon M, Robbin ML. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. Kidney Int 2002; 62 (04) 1109-1124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Robbin ML, Gallichio MH, Deierhoi MH, Young CJ, Weber TM, Allon M. US vascular mapping before hemodialysis access placement. Radiology 2000; 217 (01) 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T. et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75 (4, Suppl 2): S1-S164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Silva Jr MB, Hobson II RW, Pappas PJ. et al. A strategy for increasing use of autogenous hemodialysis access procedures: impact of preoperative noninvasive evaluation. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27 (02) 302-307 , discussion 307–308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Allon M, Lockhart ME, Lilly RZ. et al. Effect of preoperative sonographic mapping on vascular access outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001; 60 (05) 2013-2020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ferring M, Claridge M, Smith SA, Wilmink T. Routine preoperative vascular ultrasound improves patency and use of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5 (12) 2236-2244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Farrington CA, Robbin ML, Lee T, Barker-Finkel J, Allon M. Early predictors of arteriovenous fistula maturation: a novel perspective on an enduring problem. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31 (07) 1617-1627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Allon M. Vascular access for hemodialysis patients: new data should guide decision making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14 (06) 954-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Allon M. Fistula first: recent progress and ongoing challenges. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 57 (01) 3-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sidawy AN, Spergel LM, Besarab A. et al; Society for Vascular Surgery. The Society for Vascular Surgery: clinical practice guidelines for the surgical placement and maintenance of arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48 (5, Suppl): 2S-25S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Misskey J, Hamidizadeh R, Faulds J, Chen J, Gagnon J, Hsiang Y. Influence of artery and vein diameters on autogenous arteriovenous access patency. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71 (01) 158-172.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pietryga JA, Little MD, Robbin ML. Sonography of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Semin Dial 2017; 30 (04) 309-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 The AIUM Practice Parameter for the performance of ultrasound vessel mapping prior to dialysis access creation. J Ultrasound Med 2022; 41 (04) E16-E20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McCormack LJ, Cauldwell EW, Anson BJ. Brachial and antebrachial arterial patterns; a study of 750 extremities. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1953; 96 (01) 43-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kian K, Shapiro JA, Salman L. et al. High brachial artery bifurcation: clinical considerations and practical implications for an arteriovenous access. Semin Dial 2012; 25 (02) 244-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Umphrey HR, Lockhart ME, Abts CA, Robbin ML. Dialysis grafts and fistulae: planning and assessment. Ultrasound Clin 2011; 6 (04) 477-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Zimmerman P, Chin E, Laifer-Narin S, Ragavendra N, Grant EG. Radial artery mapping for coronary artery bypass graft placement. Radiology 2001; 220 (02) 299-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 McLafferty RB. Techniques to enhance arteriovenous fistula maturation. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2009; 21 (01) 41-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lockhart ME, Robbin ML. Hemodialysis access ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2001; 17 (03) 157-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lockhart ME, Robbin ML, Fineberg NS, Wells CG, Allon M. Cephalic vein measurement before forearm fistula creation: does use of a tourniquet to meet the venous diameter threshold increase the number of usable fistulas?. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25 (12) 1541-1545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Weber TM, Lockhart ME, Robbin ML. Upper extremity venous Doppler ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45 (03) 513-524 , viii–ix viii–ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Malovrh M. Native arteriovenous fistula: preoperative evaluation. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39 (06) 1218-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Chytilova E, Jemcov T, Malik J, Pajek J, Fila B, Kavan J. Role of Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemodialysis arteriovenous access maturation and influencing factors. J Vasc Access 2021; 22 (1, Suppl): 42-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Patel MC, Berman LH, Moss HA, McPherson SJ. Subclavian and internal jugular veins at Doppler US: abnormal cardiac pulsatility and respiratory phasicity as a predictor of complete central occlusion. Radiology 1999; 211 (02) 579-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Tedla FM, Clerger G, Distant D, Salifu M. Prevalence of central vein stenosis in patients referred for vein mapping. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13 (07) 1063-1068
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Franco G, Mallios A, Bourquelot P, Hebibi H, Jennings W, Boura B. Feasibility for arteriovenous fistula creation with Ellipsys® . J Vasc Access 2020; 21 (05) 701-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Yammine K, Erić M. Patterns of the superficial veins of the cubital fossa: a meta-analysis. Phlebology 2017; 32 (06) 403-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kusztal M, Weyde W, Letachowicz K, Gołebiowski T, Letachowicz W. Anatomical vascular variations and practical implications for access creation on the upper limb. J Vasc Access 2014; 15 (Suppl. 07) S70-S75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Mallios A, Jennings WC, Boura B, Costanzo A, Bourquelot P, Combes M. Early results of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation with the Ellipsys Vascular Access System. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68 (04) 1150-1156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Gracz KC, Ing TS, Soung LS, Armbruster KF, Seim SK, Merkel FK. Proximal forearm fistula for maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1977; 11 (01) 71-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lomonte C, Basile C. On the phenomenology of the perforating vein of the elbow. Semin Dial 2009; 22 (03) 300-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Hull JE, Kinsey EN, Bishop WL. Mapping of the snuffbox and cubital vessels for percutaneous arterial venous fistula (pAVF) in dialysis patients. J Vasc Access 2013; 14 (03) 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Avenu Medical. Accessed September 7, 2021 at: https://avenumedical.com/presentations/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 van Bemmelen PS, Kelly P, Blebea J. Improvement in the visualization of superficial arm veins being evaluated for access and bypass. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (05) 957-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Korten E, Spronk S, Hoedt MT, de Jong GM, Tutein Nolthenius RP. Distensibility of forearm veins in haemodialysis patients on duplex ultrasound testing using three provocation methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 38 (03) 375-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Park J, Middlekauff HR. Abnormal neurocirculatory control during exercise in humans with chronic renal failure. Auton Neurosci 2015; 188: 74-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 McGlynn PK, Arnaoutakis KD, Deroo EP, Ozaki CK, Forman JP, Hentschel DM. Postanesthesia ultrasound facilitates creation of more preferred accesses without affecting access survival. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69 (03) 898-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Nascimben Matheus C, Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro E. Change in blood flow velocity demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound in upper limb after axillary dissection surgery for the treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 127 (03) 697-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Mobley D, Kalloo SD, Baskin KM. et al. Research priorities for percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation in patients with end-stage renal disease: proceedings and recommendations from a multidisciplinary research consensus panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32 (08) 1240.e1-1240.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar