CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2024; 18(01): 289-296
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768469
Original Article

A Cross-sectional Study on the Effectiveness of Two Different Tooth-brushing Exercise Methods in Blind Childrendren

Kurniaty Pamewa
1   Pediatric Dentistry Residency Program, Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Sekeloa Selatan 1, Bandung, Indonesia
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Yayasan Wakaf, Jl. Pajonga Dg. Ngalle No.27, Pa'batong, Kec. Mamajang, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
,
Iwan Ahmad Musnamirwan
3   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Sekeloa Selatan 1, Bandung, Indonesia
,
3   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Sekeloa Selatan 1, Bandung, Indonesia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Blind children tend to have poor oral health. Oral health education is needed to reduce the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal diseases among blind children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two tooth brushing exercise methods toward blind children’s knowledge, attitude, behavior, and oral hygiene.

Materials and Methods The purposive sampling technique was used in this study on 80 blind children aged between 7 and 16. Children were divided into two groups of 40 children each. In group I, children received the tooth-brushing exercise through the Braille–verbal method, and group II received the tactile–verbal method. Their knowledge, behavior, and attitude were recorded by a questionnaire, and their oral hygiene was assessed during a personal oral examination. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney non-parametric test.

Results Differences in effectiveness toward knowledge, attitude, and oral hygiene were found between both methods with the following values: p-value = 0.04 (<0.05), 0.04 (<0.05), and 0.0002 (<0.05). No difference in effectiveness toward behavior was found: p-value 0.30 (>0.05).

Conclusion The two tooth-brushing methods could change knowledge, attitude, and oral hygiene in blind children. The tactile–verbal method was more effective than the Braille–verbal method in changing blind children's oral hygiene.

Authors' Contributions

ASS, KP conceived the ideas; KP designed the Braille book and tooth model doll; ASS and KP collected and analyzed the data; ASS, KP, and IAM contributed to drafting the manuscript; ASS finalized the writing of the manuscript; ASS and KP gave funding support.


Ethical Approval Statement

This study was conducted at Special School for Blind, Bandung, Indonesia, and was approved by Universitas Padjadjaran ethical review board with document number 120/UN.6/KEP/EC/2018




Publication History

Article published online:
13 June 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • Reference

  • 1 Liu HY, Chen JR, Hsiao SY, Huang ST. Caregivers' oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior toward their children with disabilities. J Dent Sci 2017; 12 (04) 388-395
  • 2 Ameer N, Palaparthi R, Neerudu M, Palakuru SK, Singam HR, Durvasula S. Oral hygiene and periodontal status of teenagers with special needs in the district of Nalgonda, India. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2012; 16 (03) 421-425
  • 3 Bekiroglu N, Acar N, Kargul B. Caries experience and oral hygiene status of a group of visually impaired children in Istanbul, Turkey. Oral Health Prev Dent 2012; 10 (01) 75-80
  • 4 Yevlahova D, Satur J. Models for individual oral health promotion and their effectiveness: a systematic review. Aust Dent J 2009; 54 (03) 190-197
  • 5 Do LG, Scott JA, Thomson WM. et al. Common risk factor approach to address socioeconomic inequality in the oral health of preschool children - a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 429
  • 6 Tolvanen M, Lahti S, Poutanen R, Seppä L, Pohjola V, Hausen H. Changes in children's oral health-related behavior, knowledge and attitudes during a 3.4-yr randomized clinical trial and oral health-promotion program. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117 (04) 390-397
  • 7 de Silva AM, Hegde S, Akudo Nwagbara B. et al. Community-based population-level interventions for promoting child oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9 (09) CD009837
  • 8 Gautam A, Bhambal A, Moghe S. Effect of oral health education by audio aids, Braille & tactile models on the oral health status of visually impaired children of Bhopal city. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2018; 8 (03) 168-170
  • 9 Mudunuri S, Sharma A, Subramaniam P. Perception of complete visually impaired children to three different oral health education methods: a preliminary study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 41 (04) 271-274
  • 10 Chowdary PB, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Rao VV, Rayala C. Impact of verbal, Braille text, and tactile oral hygiene awareness instructions on oral health status of visually impaired children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2016; 34 (01) 43-47
  • 11 Bhor K, Shetty V, Garcha V, Nimbulkar GC. Effect of oral health education in the form of Braille and oral health talk on oral hygiene knowledge, practices, and status of 12-17 years old visually impaired school girls in Pune city: A comparative study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016; 6 (05) 459-464
  • 12 Ganapathi AK, Namineni S, Vaaka PH. et al. Effectiveness of various sensory input methods in dental health education among blind children- a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (10) ZC75-ZC78
  • 13 Stein C, Santos NML, Hilgert JB, Hugo FN. Effectiveness of oral health education on oral hygiene and dental caries in schoolchildren: systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2018; 46 (01) 30-37
  • 14 Al-Darwish MS. Oral health knowledge, behaviour and practices among school children in Qatar. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2016; 13 (04) 342-353
  • 15 Shute VJ, Zapata-Rivera D. Adaptive educational systems. In: Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012: 7-27
  • 16 Joybell C, Krishnan R, V. SK. Comparison of two brushing methods-Fone's vs. modified bass method in visually impaired children using the audio-tactile performance (ATP) technique. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (03) ZC19-ZC22
  • 17 Foster D, Linehan C, Kirman B, Lawson S, James G. Motivating physical activity at work: Using persuasive social media for competitive step counting. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek 2010; 2010. p. 111–6.
  • 18 Sabilillah MF, Taftazani RZ, Sopianah Y, Fatmasari D. Pengaruh dental braille education (DBE) terhadap oral hygiene pada anak tunanetra. J Kesehat Gigi 2016; 3 (02) 7-13
  • 19 Abdullah N. Bagaimana mengajar anak tunanetra (di sekolah inklusi). Magistra 2012; 24 (82) 8-16
  • 20 Hahn N, Foxe JJ, Molholm S. Impairments of multisensory integration and cross-sensory learning as pathways to dyslexia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 47: 384-392
  • 21 Horton EL, Renganathan R, Toth BN. et al. A review of principles in design and usability testing of tactile technology for individuals with visual impairments. Assist Technol 2017; 29 (01) 28-36