CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indographics 2023; 02(01): 01-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768615
Review Article

Liver Transplant Complications—A Pictorial Review

1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Paari Vijayaragavan
2   KMCH Liver Institute, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Santhosh Poyyamoli
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Rajesh Kumar
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Sriman Rajasekaran
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Gowtham Sembagoundenvalasu Mahadevan
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Seetharaman Cannane
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Pudhiavan Arunachalam
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Rajkumar Ramasamy
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Harish Kumar
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Swathigha Selvaraj
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Ravindar Kashyap
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Karthick Venkatesh
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
1   Department of Radiology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Liver transplantation is the most definitive treatment for decompensated chronic liver diseases, acute hepatic failure, and localized hepatocellular carcinomas. With the widespread use of extensive preop evaluation and advanced surgical techniques, the success rate of liver transplantation has dramatically risen over the decade. In a world of increasing demand for liver donors from brain dead donors, a rising trend is seen in the acceptance of living donor liver transplantation procedures. However, postoperative surveillance needs a lower threshold for early imaging to identify the most dreaded complications for salvaging the graft. This pictorial essay aims to categorize the postliver transplantation complications and various imaging findings to diagnose them. The complications can be broadly classified into vascular and nonvascular complications. The most important concern among vascular complications is hepatic artery thrombosis, which frequently results in graft failure. The nonvascular complication comprises biliary origin, infection, and immune response. Multimodality imaging is the need of the hour, which includes ultrasound as the primary tool for gross evaluation, followed by triphasic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Newer techniques in MRI, like diffusion-weighted imaging, arterial spin labeling, diffusion kurtosis imaging, blood oxygenation-level dependent, and magnetic resonance elastography, can also be used to diagnose these complications. Interventional management through minimal access has become the first line of management in certain vascular and nonvascular complications, which can salvage the graft.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.




Publication History

Article published online:
05 October 2023

© 2023. Indographics. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References:

  • 1 Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Von Kaulla KN, Hermann G, Brittain RS, Waddell WR. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963; 117: 659-679 PubMed
  • 2 Singh AK, Nachiappan AC, Verma HA. et al. Postoperative imaging in liver transplantation: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 2010; 30 (02) 339-351
  • 3 Chupetlovska KP, Borhani AA, Dasyam AK, Van der Windt DJ, Tevar AD, Furlan A. Post-operative imaging anatomy in liver transplantation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46 (01) 9-16
  • 4 Borhani AA, Elsayes KM, Catania R. et al. Imaging evaluation of living liver donor candidates: techniques, protocols, and anatomy. Radiographics 2021; 41 (06) 1572-1591
  • 5 Quiroga S, Sebastià MC, Margarit C, Castells L, Boyé R, Alvarez-Castells A. Complications of orthotopic liver transplantation: spectrum of findings with helical CT. Radiographics 2001; 21 (05) 1085-1102
  • 6 Horrow MM, Huynh ML, Callaghan MM, Rodgers SK. Complications after liver transplant related to preexisting conditions: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Radiographics 2020; 40 (03) 895-909
  • 7 Sainz-Barriga M, Scudeller L, Costa MG, de Hemptinne B, Troisi RI. Lack of a correlation between portal vein flow and pressure: toward a shared interpretation of hemodynamic stress governing inflow modulation in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2011; 17 (07) 836-848
  • 8 Asencio JM, Vaquero J, Olmedilla L, García Sabrido JL. “Small-for-flow” syndrome: shifting the “size” paradigm. Med Hypotheses 2013; 80 (05) 573-577
  • 9 Kimura Y, Tapia Sosa R, Soto-Trujillo D, Kimura Sandoval Y, Casian C. Liver transplant complications radiologist can't miss. Cureus 2020; 12 (06) e8465
  • 10 Kashyap R, Bozorgzadeh A, Abt P. et al. Stratifying risk of biliary complications in adult living donor liver transplantation by magnetic resonance cholangiography. Transplantation 2008; 85 (11) 1569-1572
  • 11 Proposito D, Loinaz Segurola C, Garcia Garcìa I. et al. Assessment of risk factors in the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis in a consecutive series of 687 liver transplantations [in Italian]. Ann Ital Chir 2001; 72 (02) 187-205
  • 12 Naidu SG, Alzubaidi SJ, Patel IJ. et al. Interventional radiology management of adult liver transplant complications. Radiographics 2022; 42 (06) 1705-1723
  • 13 Caiado AH, Blasbalg R, Marcelino AS. et al. Complications of liver transplantation: multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics 2007; 27 (05) 1401-1417
  • 14 Dodd III GD, Memel DS, Zajko AB, Baron RL, Santaguida LA. Hepatic artery stenosis and thrombosis in transplant recipients: Doppler diagnosis with resistive index and systolic acceleration time. Radiology 1994; 192 (03) 657-661
  • 15 Glockner JF, Forauer AR, Solomon H, Varma CR, Perman WH. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of vascular complications after liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174 (05) 1447-1453
  • 16 Nghiem HV, Tran K, Winter III TC. et al. Imaging of complications in liver transplantation. Radiographics 1996; 16 (04) 825-840
  • 17 Sanyal R, Zarzour JG, Ganeshan DM, Bhargava P, Lall CG, Little MD. Postoperative Doppler evaluation of liver transplants. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014; 24 (04) 360-366
  • 18 Chong WK, Beland JC, Weeks SM. Sonographic evaluation of venous obstruction in liver transplants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (06) W515-21
  • 19 Woo DH, Laberge JM, Gordon RL, Wilson MW, Kerlan Jr RK. Management of portal venous complications after liver transplantation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 10 (03) 233-239
  • 20 Shibata T, Itoh K, Kubo T. et al. Percutaneous transhepatic balloon dilation of portal venous stenosis in patients with living donor liver transplantation. Radiology 2005; 235 (03) 1078-1083
  • 21 Duffy JP, Hong JC, Farmer DG. et al. Vascular complications of orthotopic liver transplantation: experience in more than 4,200 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208 (05) 896-903 , discussion 903–905
  • 22 Li C, Kapoor B, Moon E, Quintini C, Wang W. Current understanding and management of splenic steal syndrome after liver transplant: a systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2017; 31 (03) 188-192
  • 23 Giampalma E, Renzulli M, Mosconi C, Ercolani G, Pinna AD, Golfieri R. Outcome of post-liver transplant ischemic and nonischemic biliary stenoses treated with percutaneous interventions: the Bologna experience. Liver Transpl 2012; 18 (02) 177-187
  • 24 Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W. Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 (04) 559-578
  • 25 Fayad LM, Holland GA, Bergin D. et al. Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18 (04) 449-460
  • 26 Banzo I, Blanco I, Gutiérrez-Mendiguchía C, Gómez-Barquín R, Quirce R, Carril JM. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bile leaks produced after T-tube removal in orthotopic liver transplantation. Nucl Med Commun 1998; 19 (03) 229-236
  • 27 Young SA, Sfakianakis GN, Pyrsopoulos N, Nishida S. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy in liver transplant patients: the “blind end sign” and its differentiation from bile leak. Clin Nucl Med 2003; 28 (08) 638-642
  • 28 Sureka B, Bansal K, Rajesh S, Mukund A, Pamecha V, Arora A. Imaging panorama in postoperative complications after liver transplantation. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2016; 4 (02) 96-106
  • 29 Mazariegos GV, Molmenti EP, Kramer DJ. Early complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79 (01) 109-129
  • 30 Itri JN, Heller MT, Tublin ME. Hepatic transplantation: postoperative complications. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38 (06) 1300-1333
  • 31 Borhani AA, Hosseinzadeh K, Almusa O, Furlan A, Nalesnik M. Imaging of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after solid organ transplantation. Radiographics 2009; 29 (04) 981-1000 , discussion 1000–1002
  • 32 Ferris JV, Baron RL, Marsh Jr JW, Oliver III JH, Carr BI, Dodd III GD. Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: spectrum of CT findings and recurrence patterns. Radiology 1996; 198 (01) 233-238
  • 33 Chinnakotla S, Davis GL, Vasani S. et al. Impact of sirolimus on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009; 15 (12) 1834-1842
  • 34 Kornberg A, Küpper B, Tannapfel A. et al. Long-term survival after recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant patients: clinical patterns and outcome variables. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36 (03) 275-280
  • 35 Sanyal R, Shah SN. Role of imaging in the management of splenic artery steal syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28 (04) 471-477
  • 36 Langer R, Langer M, Scholz A, Felix R, Neuhaus P, Keck H. The splenic steal syndrome and the gastroduodenal steal syndrome in patients before and after liver transplantation [in German]. Aktuelle Radiol 1992; 2 (02) 55-58
  • 37 Quintini C, Hirose K, Hashimoto K. et al. “Splenic artery steal syndrome” is a misnomer: the cause is portal hyperperfusion, not arterial siphon. Liver Transpl 2008; 14 (03) 374-379
  • 38 Li H, Gao K, Huang Q, Dai D, Zhai R. Successful management of splenic artery steal syndrome with hepatic artery stenosis in an orthotopic liver transplant recipient. Ann Transplant 2014; 19: 145-148
  • 39 Presser N, Quintini C, Tom C. et al. Safety and efficacy of splenic artery embolization for portal hyperperfusion in liver transplant recipients: a 5-year experience. Liver Transpl 2015; 21 (04) 435-441