Semin Thromb Hemost
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768938
Letter to the Editor

Why Does Rivaroxaban Not Work in Severe Mitral Stenosis?

Francesco Marongiu
1   Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
2   Fondazione Arianna Anticoagulazione, Bologna, Italy
Doris Barcellona
1   Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
› Author Affiliations

Mitral stenosis is not a rare disease. Rheumatic fever is the principal cause of mitral stenosis. Anulus calcification and congenital heart disease are recognized as other causes of mitral stenosis.[1] In developed countries, the prevalence is approximately 0.6 in 1,000 in the United States, but it is much higher in developing nations: 21 cases per 1,000 in Asia, 15 cases per 1,000 in Africa, and 17 cases per 1,000 in South America.[2] Atrial fibrillation occurs in approximately 32% of symptomatic patients, thus decreasing cardiac output and exercise capacity, and greatly increasing the risk of thromboembolism.[3] Oral anticoagulation is therefore mandatory in these patients. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been found to be noninferior or superior versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g., warfarin) in preventing cardioembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation,[4] patients with atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease were not enrolled in earlier trials, thus excluding this pathological condition from approved indications.[5] Since ensuring adequate anticoagulation with laboratory monitoring while using VKAs may be difficult in developing countries, DOACs have the potential to improve the extension of oral anticoagulation without the need of any laboratory control. The commitment to plan a superiority trial (DOAC vs. VKA) came in 2016 from the cardiology community, which aimed to design a superiority trial involving a single-dose DOAC (no laboratory monitoring) versus VKA (with laboratory monitoring), and since the latter showed a poor time in the therapeutic range in countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.[6] Thus, a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, in comparison with VKA was planned and recently completed (INVICTUS trial). The trial involved patients with rheumatic heart disease from Africa, Asia, and Latin America,[7] enrolling patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease. Eighty-five percent of trial participants had mitral-valve stenosis, which was moderate-to-severe in 82%. These participants had a CHA2DS2VASc score of at least 2, a mitral-valve area of no more than 2 cm2, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), or left atrial thrombus. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard doses of rivaroxaban (20 mg/day) or dose-adjusted VKA (INR: 2.0–3.0). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of follow-up was 3.1 ± 1.2 years. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular (cardiac or noncardiac) or unknown causes. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH).[8] A total of 4,531 participants were included in the final analysis. Mean age of the patients (72.3% women) was 50.5 years.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, 560 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446 in the VKA group had a primary-outcome event (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–1.41). Stroke was more frequent in the rivaroxaban group (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.10–2.16) as well as death (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.40) and death from vascular cause (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08–1.47). The restricted mean survival time was 1,599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1,675 days in the VKA group (difference, −76 days; 95% CI: −121 to −31; p < 0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the VKA group (restricted mean survival time: 1,608 vs. 1,680 days; difference, −72 days, 95% CI: −117 to −28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted. However, fatal bleeding was lower in the rivaroxaban group (4 vs. 15 patients; HR: 0.29, 96% CI: 0.10–0.88). The authors stated that the results of this trial were unexpected, perhaps because of the reduced power for the outcome of stroke, whose rates in the two groups were lower than expected. In addition, the difference in the rate of stroke was modest, which suggests that the difference could be due to chance. We do not agree with this observation since, globally, stroke was more frequent in the rivaroxaban group by 50% in comparison with that of VKA. However, the authors realized that the higher rates of death in the rivaroxaban group were certainly not due to chance. In this regard, they realized that patients in the VKA group had a monthly regular follow-up with the physicians in comparison with those in the rivaroxaban group. A better general care is an important outcome of any medical intervention. This approach is known to be important in the management of VKA, as demonstrated in the long-term experience of anticoagulation clinics in Italy.[9] [10] Another possible reason to explain the trial results comes from the consideration, as the authors underline, that adherence to rivaroxaban therapy was worse than that of VKA because of the lack of regular follow-up, since laboratory monitoring was no longer necessary. We recently demonstrated that adherence and persistence to either VKA or DOAC is good, provided that careful periodical monitoring is instigated.[11] Interestingly, the authors noted that the lower rate of the composite outcome in favor of VKA became considerable after 3 years, probably due to a progressive management of VKA in the long-term trial. Gregory Lip, in an accompanying editorial,[12] acutely expressed the need for a “holistic treatment of patients with rheumatic heart disease–associated atrial fibrillation, beyond the anticoagulation per se.” In other words, the concept of a periodical follow-up of patients treated with DOAC appears to be important to offer a complete approach in terms of personalized care, especially in consideration of other comorbidities, which are, in general, frequent in anticoagulated patients. The lack of this organization for rivaroxaban participants could explain why deaths were less common in the VKA group.

Nevertheless, can we find other possible reasons to explain the results of this trial? If we go back to the pathophysiology of the disease, we know that a very low shear rate develops concomitantly to the worsening of the stenosis. The reduced flow rates through the stenosis induce turbulence,[13] which can cause red blood cell (RBC) aggregation, which is a phenomenon known to be a risk factor for cardioembolism.[14] RBC aggregates are known to be visible as SECs in mitral stenosis[15] and also in atrial fibrillation[16] ([Fig. 1]). In patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm, if SEC is present, von Willebrand factor is increased, indicating an endothelial dysfunction.[17] Rastegar et al demonstrated that SECs are mediated by the fibrinogen levels (i.e., as fibrinogen concentration increased, the SEC became denser).[18] On the other hand, RBC aggregates can also release microparticles,[19] which in turn are able to activate blood coagulation via the contact activation[20] [21] ([Fig. 2]). In particular, factor IX can be activated directly by an elastase-like enzyme on the RBC membrane.[22] Exposure of phosphatidylserine by RBC is another crucial step for activation of blood coagulation, providing an optimal substrate for clotting factors which are ready to be involved in blood clot formation.[23]

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Spontaneous echo contrast and subsequent fibrin deposition. (Figure created by Francesco Marongiu; Procreate software for I-PAD Pro12.)
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Red blood cell aggregates and derived microparticles. (Figure created by Francesco Marongiu; Procreate software for I-PAD Pro12.)

Is there a link between SEC and inflammation in mitral stenosis? Recently, a report by Kelesoglu et al demonstrated an independent association between SEC and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in patients with mitral stenosis. Moreover, SII levels correlated with the degree of SEC.[24] SII is an accepted index of inflammation.[25] SII is defined as platelet × neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio. In other words, it appears that a chronic inflammatory state is present in the course of mitral stenosis as already shown by Guilherme et al[26] and by Sharma et al, who found elevated levels of IL-6, CRP, and sCD-40L in patients with mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation.[27] It has been shown that the in vivo expression of tissue factor is dependent on IL-6.[28] The tissue factor–factor VIIa complex activates factor IX, forming a tenase complex with activated factor IX and factor X, generating additional factor Xa, so inducing a positive feedback, greatly facilitated by the presence of platelets, which can be activated by proinflammatory mediators or by thrombin.[29] Taken together, all these considerations indicate how blood coagulation can be activated in the course of mitral stenosis. Both the tissue factor and the contact activation seem to be involved in the creation of a thrombotic burden. Although VKAs are able to reduce thrombin via the inhibition of several clotting factors, strategically placed, thus profoundly interfering with the intrinsic (factor IX), extrinsic (factor VII), and common (factor X) pathways of blood coagulation, rivaroxaban may work less well in blunting such a potent procoagulant force by inhibiting only factor Xa. An example of such phenomenon also comes from the experience afforded by the comparison of dabigatran versus warfarin in prosthetic mechanical heart valves.[30] In that trial, dabigatran was not able to counteract the contact activation of blood coagulation at the usual dosages as later demonstrated by Jaffer et al.[31]

Finally, was the rivaroxaban dosage appropriate in the INVICTUS trial? Perhaps an administration twice a day employing 15 mg every 12 hours might have been more appropriate for counterbalancing the thrombotic milieu of patients with mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation, since the half-life of rivaroxaban is around 12 hours.[32] Another condition in which rivaroxaban resulted inferior to warfarin is the antiphospholipid syndrome,[33] probably because of similar pathophysiological reasons: an important prothrombotic burden driven by both cellular and complement activation[34] on one hand and the single dosage of rivaroxaban on the other, as stated earlier. A new potential strategy may be provision of dual DOACs (anti-Xa, anti-IIa), because of synergy between lower dosages of each, as has been recently demonstrated in vitro.[35] The authors hypothesized that this strategy may also work in vivo. Alternatively, anti-XII and anti-XI anticoagulants,[36] along with a low dose of DOAC, might reflect another approach in the management of severe mitral stenosis. In conclusion, the potential explanation for the failure of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the INVICTUS trial seems to be the lack of a clinical follow-up during the course of the treatment, as otherwise facilitated by the anticoagulation clinics for VKA, and the multiple points for blood coagulation activation secondary to the chronic inflammation state of mitral stenosis.

Publication History

Article published online:
09 May 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

  • References

  • 1 Chandrashekhar Y, Westaby S, Narula J. Mitral stenosis. Lancet 2009; 374 (9697): 1271-1283
  • 2 World Health Organization (WHO). Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease: Report of WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 29 October to 1 November 2001. Geneva: WHO; 2004
  • 3 Noubiap JJ, Nyaga UF, Ndoadoumgue AL, Nkeck JR, Ngouo A, Bigna JJ. Meta-analysis of the incidence, prevalence, and correlates of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic heart disease. Glob Heart 2020; 15 (01) 38
  • 4 Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383 (9921): 955-962
  • 5 January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H. et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74 (01) 104-132
  • 6 De Caterina R, John Camm A. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation accompanying mitral stenosis: the concept for a trial. Europace 2016; 18 (01) 6-11
  • 7 Connolly SJ, Karthikeyan G, Ntsekhe M. et al; INVICTUS Investigators. Rivaroxaban in rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (11) 978-988
  • 8 Schulman S, Kearon C. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3 (04) 692-694
  • 9 Marongiu F, Barcellona D. The future of anticoagulation clinics: a journey to thrombosis centers?. Haematologica 2005; 90 (03) 298-301
  • 10 Barcellona D, Contu P, Marongiu F. Patient education and oral anticoagulant therapy. Haematologica 2002; 87 (10) 1081-1086
  • 11 Barcellona D, Mameli A, Cornacchini S. et al. Patients' adherence to oral anticoagulants therapy: comparison between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants. Int J Cardiol 2021; 333: 162-166
  • 12 Lip GYH. Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (11) 1036-1038
  • 13 Bluestein D, Einav S. The effect of varying degrees of stenosis on the characteristics of turbulent pulsatile flow through heart valves. J Biomech 1995; 28 (08) 915-924
  • 14 González-Torrecilla E, García-Fernández MA, Pérez-David E, Bermejo J, Moreno M, Delcán JL. Predictors of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thrombi in patients with mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86 (05) 529-534
  • 15 Agarwal AK, Venugopalan P. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis in sinus rhythm: relationship to mitral valve and left atrial measurements. Int J Cardiol 2001; 77 (01) 63-68
  • 16 Black IW, Chesterman CN, Hopkins AP, Lee LC, Chong BH, Walsh WF. Hematologic correlates of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21 (02) 451-457
  • 17 Topaloglu S, Boyaci A, Ayaz S. et al. Coagulation, fibrinolytic system activation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm. Angiology 2007; 58 (01) 85-91
  • 18 Rastegar R, Harnick DJ, Weidemann P. et al. Spontaneous echo contrast video density is flow-related and is dependent on the relative concentrations of fibrinogen and red blood cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41 (04) 603-610
  • 19 Alamin AA. The role of red blood cells in hemostasis. Semin Thromb Hemost 2021; 47 (01) 26-31
  • 20 Van Der Meijden PE, Van Schilfgaarde M, Van Oerle R, Renné T, ten Cate H, Spronk HM. Platelet- and erythrocyte-derived microparticles trigger thrombin generation via factor XIIa. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10 (07) 1355-1362
  • 21 Noubouossie DF, Henderson MW, Mooberry M. et al. Red blood cell microvesicles activate the contact system, leading to factor IX activation via 2 independent pathways. Blood 2020; 135 (10) 755-765
  • 22 Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Red blood cells: the forgotten player in hemostasis and thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2019; 17 (02) 271-282
  • 23 Whelihan MF, Mann KG. The role of the red cell membrane in thrombin generation. Thromb Res 2013; 131 (05) 377-382
  • 24 Kelesoglu S, Elcık D, Zengin I. et al. Association of spontaneous echo contrast with systemic immune inflammation index in patients with mitral stenosis. Rev Port Cardiol 2022; 41 (12) 1001-1008
  • 25 Ye Z, Hu T, Wang J. et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index as a potential biomarker of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 933913
  • 26 Guilherme L, Cury P, Demarchi LM. et al. Rheumatic heart disease: proinflammatory cytokines play a role in the progression and maintenance of valvular lesions. Am J Pathol 2004; 165 (05) 1583-1591
  • 27 Sharma G, Ghati N, Sharique M. et al. Role of inflammation in initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic mitral stenosis - an analytical cross-sectional study. J Arrhythm 2020; 36 (06) 1007-1015
  • 28 van der Poll T, Levi M, Hack CE. et al. Elimination of interleukin 6 attenuates coagulation activation in experimental endotoxemia in chimpanzees. J Exp Med 1994; 179 (04) 1253-1259
  • 29 Levi M, van der Poll T. Inflammation and coagulation. Crit Care Med 2010; 38 (2, Suppl): S26-S34
  • 30 Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M. et al; RE-ALIGN Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (13) 1206-1214
  • 31 Jaffer IH, Stafford AR, Fredenburgh JC, Whitlock RP, Chan NC, Weitz JI. Dabigatran is less effective than warfarin at attenuating mechanical heart valve-induced thrombin generation. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4 (08) e002322
  • 32 Mueck W, Stampfuss J, Kubitza D, Becka M. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of rivaroxaban. Clin Pharmacokinet 2014; 53 (01) 1-16
  • 33 Pengo V, Denas G, Zoppellaro G. et al. Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood 2018; 132 (13) 1365-1371
  • 34 Arachchillage DRJ, Pericleous C. Evolution of antiphospholipid syndrome. Semin Thromb Hemost 2023; 49 (03) 295-304
  • 35 Exner T, Ellwood L, Dangol M, Favaloro EJ. Mixing factor Xa and thrombin inhibiting direct oral anticoagulants produces a synergistic prolonging effect on most clotting tests. Int J Lab Hematol 2023; DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.14043.
  • 36 Weitz JI. Factor XI and factor XII as targets for new anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2016; 141 (Suppl. 02) S40-S45