CC BY 4.0 · Avicenna J Med 2023; 13(02): 068-076
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769088
Review Article

Decolonizing Epidemiological Research: A Critical Perspective

1   Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Decolonizing epidemiological research is a crucial endeavor. Historically, colonial and imperialistic ideologies have pervaded epidemiology, leading to an emphasis on Western perspectives and the neglect of indigenous and other marginalized communities' needs and experiences. To effectively address health disparities and promote justice and equality, acknowledging and addressing these power imbalances are imperative. In this article, I highlight the need of decolonizing epidemiological research and make recommendations. These include increasing the representation of researchers from underrepresented communities, ensuring that epidemiological research is contextually relevant and responsive to the experiences of these communities, and collaborating with policymakers and advocacy groups to inform policies and practices that benefit all populations. Moreover, I underscore the importance of recognizing and valuing the knowledge and skills of marginalized populations, and integrating traditional knowledge—the distinct, culturally specific understanding unique to a particular group—into research efforts. I also emphasize the need of capacity building and equitable research collaborations and authorship as well as epidemiological journal editorship. Decolonizing epidemiology research is a continual process that requires continuing discourse, collaboration, and education.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 June 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Frérot M, Lefebvre A, Aho S, Callier P, Astruc K, Aho Glélé LS. What is epidemiology? Changing definitions of epidemiology 1978-2017. PLoS One 2018; 13 (12) e0208442
  • 2 Sevalho G. Contribuições das críticas pós-colonial e decolonial para a contextualização do conceito de cultura na Epidemiologia [Contributions of postcolonial and decolonial criticisms to the contextualization of the concept of culture in Epidemiology]. Cad Saude Publica 2022; Jun 8; 38 (06) e00243421
  • 3 Perry MJ, Arrington S, Freisthler MS. et al. Pervasive structural racism in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health 2021; 20 (01) 119
  • 4 Jones CP, LaVeist TA, Lillie-Blanton M. “Race” in the epidemiologic literature: an examination of the American Journal of Epidemiology, 1921-1990. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134 (10) 1079-1084
  • 5 Jones CP. Invited commentary: “race,” racism, and the practice of epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154 (04) 299-304 , discussion 305–306
  • 6 LaVeist TA. On the study of race, racism, and health: a shift from description to explanation. Int J Health Serv 2000; 30 (01) 217-219
  • 7 Hardeman RR, Murphy KA, Karbeah J, Kozhimannil KB. Naming institutionalized racism in the public health literature: a systematic literature review. Public Health Rep 2018; 133 (03) 240-249
  • 8 Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA. Racism and health: evidence and needed research. Annu Rev Public Health 2019; 40: 105-125
  • 9 Gee GC, Ford CL. Structural racism and health inequities: old issues, new directions. Du Bois Rev 2011; 8 (01) 115-132
  • 10 Abimbola S, Pai M. Undoing supremacy in global health will require more than decolonisation - Authors' reply. Lancet 2021; 397 (10279): 1058-1059
  • 11 Abimbola S, Asthana S, Montenegro C. et al. Addressing power asymmetries in global health: imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS Med 2021; 18 (04) e1003604
  • 12 Lawrence J. The Indian health service and the sterilization of native American women. Am Indian Q 2000; 24 (03) 400-419
  • 13 Park J. Historical origins of the Tuskegee experiment: the dilemma of public health in the United States. Uisahak 2017; 26 (03) 545-578
  • 14 Corbie-Smith G. The continuing legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: considerations for clinical investigation. Am J Med Sci 1999; 317 (01) 5-8
  • 15 Crenner C. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the scientific concept of racial nervous resistance. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2012; 67 (02) 244-280
  • 16 Freimuth VS, Quinn SC, Thomas SB, Cole G, Zook E, Duncan T. African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52 (05) 797-808
  • 17 Rodriguez MA, García R. First, do no harm: the US sexually transmitted disease experiments in Guatemala. Am J Public Health 2013; 103 (12) 2122-2126
  • 18 Spector-Bagdady K, Lombardo PA. From in vivo to in vitro: How the Guatemala STD experiments transformed bodies into biospecimens. Milbank Q 2018; 96 (02) 244-271
  • 19 Lynch HF. The rights and wrongs of intentional exposure research: contextualising the Guatemala STD inoculation study. J Med Ethics 2012; 38 (08) 513-515
  • 20 Jaworsky D. An allied research paradigm for epidemiology research with Indigenous peoples. Arch Public Health 2019; 77: 22
  • 21 Bach M, Jordan S, Hartung S, Santos-Hövener C, Wright MT. Participatory epidemiology: the contribution of participatory research to epidemiology. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2017; 14: 2
  • 22 Griffith DM, Shelton RC, Kegler M. Advancing the science of qualitative research to promote health equity. Health Educ Behav 2017; 44 (05) 673-676
  • 23 Chakraborty J, Collins TW, Grineski SE, Maldonado A. Racial differences in perceptions of air pollution health risk: does environmental exposure matter?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14 (02) 116
  • 24 Macias T. Environmental risk perception among race and ethnic groups in the United States. Ethnicities 2016; 16 (01) 111-129
  • 25 Zota AR, Shamasunder B. Environmental health equity: moving toward a solution-oriented research agenda. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2021; 31 (03) 399-400
  • 26 Benmarhnia T, Hajat A, Kaufman JS. Inferential challenges when assessing racial/ethnic health disparities in environmental research. Environ Health 2021; 20 (01) 7
  • 27 Gochfeld M, Burger J. Disproportionate exposures in environmental justice and other populations: the importance of outliers. Am J Public Health 2011; 101 (Suppl 1, Suppl 1): S53-S63
  • 28 Mooney SJ, Westreich DJ, El-Sayed AM. Commentary: epidemiology in the era of big data. Epidemiology 2015; 26 (03) 390-394
  • 29 Mehta N, Shukla S. Pandemic analytics: how countries are leveraging big data analytics and artificial intelligence to fight COVID-19?. SN Comput Sci 2022; 3 (01) 54
  • 30 Qato DM. Reflections on 'Decolonizing' big data in global health. Ann Glob Health 2022; 88 (01) 56
  • 31 Adebisi YA, Lucero-Prisno III DE. Fixing data gaps for population health in Africa: an urgent need. Int J Public Health 2022; 67: 1605418
  • 32 Wagenaar BH, Hirschhorn LR, Henley C, Gremu A, Sindano N, Chilengi R. AHI PHIT Partnership Collaborative. Data-driven quality improvement in low-and middle-income country health systems: lessons from seven years of implementation experience across Mozambique, Rwanda, and Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 (Suppl. 03) 830
  • 33 Cameron M, Andersson N, McDowell I, Ledogar RJ. Culturally safe epidemiology: oxymoron or scientific imperative. Pimatziwin 2010; 8 (02) 89-116
  • 34 Avilés LA. Epidemiology as discourse: the politics of development institutions in the epidemiological profile of El Salvador. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55 (03) 164-171
  • 35 Savitz DA, Poole C, Miller WC. Reassessing the role of epidemiology in public health. Am J Public Health 1999; 89 (08) 1158-1161
  • 36 Krieger N. Questioning epidemiology: objectivity, advocacy, and socially responsible science. Am J Public Health 1999; 89 (08) 1151-1153
  • 37 Wani AL, Ara A, Usmani JA. Lead toxicity: a review. Interdiscip Toxicol 2015; 8 (02) 55-64
  • 38 Delgado CF, Ullery MA, Jordan M, Duclos C, Rajagopalan S, Scott K. Lead exposure and developmental disabilities in preschool-aged children. J Public Health Manag Pract 2018; 24 (02) e10-e17
  • 39 Ide LS, Parker DL. Hazardous child labor: lead and neurocognitive development. Public Health Rep 2005; 120 (06) 607-612
  • 40 Van Horne YO, Alcala CS, Peltier RE. et al. An applied environmental justice framework for exposure science. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2023; 33 (01) 1-11
  • 41 Sharma A. Decolonizing international relations: confronting erasures through Indigenous knowledge systems. Int Stud 2021; 58 (01) 25-40
  • 42 Mazzocchi F. Western science and traditional knowledge. Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other. EMBO Rep 2006; 7 (05) 463-466
  • 43 Binagwaho A, Ngarambe B, Mathewos K. Eliminating the white supremacy mindset from global health education. Ann Glob Health 2022; 88 (01) 32
  • 44 Richardson L, Crawford A. COVID-19 and the decolonization of Indigenous public health. CMAJ 2020; 192 (38) E1098-E1100
  • 45 Hayward A, Wodtke L, Craft A. et al. Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada. SSM Popul Health 2021; 15: 100899
  • 46 Adebisi YA, Ekpenyong A, Ntacyabukura B. et al. COVID-19 highlights the need for inclusive responses to public health emergencies in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 104 (02) 449-452
  • 47 Sapienza JN, Corbie-Smith G, Keim S, Fleischman AR. Community engagement in epidemiological research. Ambul Pediatr 2007; 7 (03) 247-252
  • 48 McWhirter RE, Critchley CR, Nicol D. et al. Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool. J Pers Med 2014; 4 (04) 459-474
  • 49 Cwikel JG. After epidemiological research: what next? Community action for health promotion. Public Health Rev 1994; 22 (3-4): 375-394
  • 50 Haushofer J, Kremer M, Maertens R, Joe Tan B. Water Treatment and Child Mortality: Evidence from Kenya. NBER: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed May 3, 2023 at: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1887261/water-treatment-and-child-mortality/2636577/
  • 51 Horby PW, Endzt H, Muyembe-Tamfum JJ. et al. Ebola: Europe-Africa research collaborations. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15 (11) 1258-1259
  • 52 Bell BP, Damon IK, Jernigan DB. et al. Overview, control strategies, and lessons learned in the CDC response to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic. MMWR Suppl 2016; 65 (03) 4-11
  • 53 Coughlin SS. Ethical issues in epidemiologic research and public health practice. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2006; 3: 16
  • 54 Allen B, Lewis A. Diversity and political leaning: considerations for epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2020; 189 (10) 1011-1015
  • 55 Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Epidemiology–is it time to call it a day?. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30 (01) 1-11
  • 56 Herrick C, Bell K. Epidemic confusions: on irony and decolonisation in global health. Glob Public Health 2022; 17 (08) 1467-1478
  • 57 Malterud K, Bjorkman M, Flatval M, Ohnstad A, Thesen J, Rortveit G. Epidemiological research on marginalized groups implies major validity challenges; lesbian health as an example. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (07) 703-710
  • 58 Leung MW, Yen IH, Minkler M. Community based participatory research: a promising approach for increasing epidemiology's relevance in the 21st century. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33 (03) 499-506
  • 59 Datta R. Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Res Ethics Rev 2018; 14 (02) 1-24
  • 60 Marmot M. Social justice, epidemiology and health inequalities. Eur J Epidemiol 2017; 32 (07) 537-546
  • 61 McCartney G, Dickie E, Escobar O, Collins C. Health inequalities, fundamental causes and power: towards the practice of good theory. Sociol Health Illn 2021; 43 (01) 20-39
  • 62 Zelner J, Masters NB, Naraharisetti R, Mojola SA, Chowkwanyun M, Malosh R. There are no equal opportunity infectors: epidemiological modelers must rethink our approach to inequality in infection risk. PLOS Comput Biol 2022; 18 (02) e1009795
  • 63 Nguyen M, Chaudhry SI, Desai MM, Dzirasa K, Cavazos JE, Boatright D. Gender, racial, and ethnic and inequities in receipt of multiple national institutes of health research project grants. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (02) e230855
  • 64 Carnethon MR, Kershaw KN, Kandula NR. Disparities research, disparities researchers, and health equity. JAMA 2020; 323 (03) 211-212
  • 65 Alaran AJ, Adebisi YA, Badmos A. et al. Uneven power dynamics must be levelled in COVID-19 vaccines access and distribution. Public Health Pract (Oxf) 2021; 2: 100096
  • 66 Benach J, Cash-Gibson L, Rojas-Gualdrón DF, Padilla-Pozo Á, Fernández-Gracia J, Eguíluz VM. COVID-SHINE group. Inequalities in COVID-19 inequalities research: who had the capacity to respond?. PLoS One 2022; 17 (05) e0266132
  • 67 Finkel ML, Temmermann M, Suleman F. et al. What do global health practitioners think about decolonizing global health?. Ann Glob Health 2022; 88 (01) 61
  • 68 Bump JB, Aniebo I. Colonialism, malaria, and the decolonization of global health. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2 (09) e0000936
  • 69 Green G. Power to the people: To what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this?. Res Involv Engagem 2016; 2: 28
  • 70 Adebisi YA, Lucero-Prisno DE. Community engagement in global health research. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 2022;
  • 71 Baah FO, Teitelman AM, Riegel B. Marginalization: conceptualizing patient vulnerabilities in the framework of social determinants of health-an integrative review. Nurs Inq 2019; 26 (01) e12268
  • 72 Skelly E, Kapellas K, Cooper A, Weyrich LS. Consequences of colonialism: a microbial perspective to contemporary Indigenous health. Am J Phys Anthropol 2018; 167 (02) 423-437
  • 73 Asi YM, Hammoudeh W, Mills D, Tanous O, Wispelwey B. Reassembling the pieces: settler colonialism and the reconception of Palestinian Health. Health Hum Rights 2022; 24 (02) 229-235
  • 74 Barnabe C. Towards attainment of Indigenous health through empowerment: resetting health systems, services and provider approaches. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6 (02) e004052
  • 75 Ring I, Brown N. The health status of indigenous peoples and others. BMJ 2003; 327 (7412): 404-405
  • 76 Danso A, Danso Y. The complexities of race and health. Future Healthc J 2021; 8 (01) 22-27
  • 77 Stopforth S, Kapadia D, Nazroo J, Bécares L. The enduring effects of racism on health: understanding direct and indirect effects over time. SSM Popul Health 2022; 19: 101217
  • 78 Rothenberg R. The relevance of social epidemiology in HIV/AIDS and drug abuse research. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32 (6, Suppl): S147-S153
  • 79 von dem Knesebeck O. Concepts of social epidemiology in health services research. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 357
  • 80 Honjo K. Social epidemiology: definition, history, and research examples. Environ Health Prev Med 2004; 9 (05) 193-199
  • 81 Paradies Y, Ben J, Denson N. et al. Racism as a determinant of health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10 (09) e0138511
  • 82 Aldrich MC, Cust AE, Raynes-Greenow C. International Network for Epidemiology in Policy. Gender equity in epidemiology: a policy brief. Ann Epidemiol 2019; 35: 1-3
  • 83 Beckfield J, Krieger N. Epi + demos + cracy: linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities–evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. Epidemiol Rev 2009; 31: 152-177
  • 84 Shambe I, Thomas K, Bradley J, Marchant T, Weiss HA, Webb EL. Bibliometric analysis of authorship patterns in publications from a research group at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 2016-2020. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8 (02) e011053
  • 85 Abimbola S. The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4 (05) e002068
  • 86 Saleh S, Masekela R, Heinz E. et al; Equitable Authorship Consensus Statement Group. Equity in global health research: a proposal to adopt author reflexivity statements. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2 (03) e0000160
  • 87 Ghani M, Hurrell R, Verceles AC, McCurdy MT, Papali A. Geographic, subject, and authorship trends among LMIC-based scientific publications in high-impact global health and general medicine journals: a 30-month bibliometric analysis. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2021; 11 (01) 92-97
  • 88 Ðoàn LN, Bacong AM, Ma KPK, Morey BN. Epidemiologists count: the role of diversity and inclusion in the field of epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2020; 189 (10) 1033-1036
  • 89 Romsland GI, Milosavljevic KL, Andreassen TA. Facilitating non-tokenistic user involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem 2019; 5: 18
  • 90 Khan SA. Decolonising global health by decolonising academic publishing. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7 (03) e007811
  • 91 Manan MR, Nawaz I, Rahman S. et al. Diversity, equity, and inclusion on editorial boards of global health journals. Asian Bioeth Rev 2023; 15: 209-239
  • 92 Bhaumik S, Jagnoor J. Diversity in the editorial boards of global health journals. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4 (05) e001909
  • 93 Walter M, Anderson C. Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Research Methodology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2013
  • 94 Chilisa B. Indigenous Research Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2012
  • 95 Prussing E. Critical epidemiology in action: research for and by indigenous peoples. SSM Popul Health 2018; 6: 98-106
  • 96 Prussing E. Through a critical lens: expertise in epidemiology for and by indigenous peoples. Sci Technol Human Values 2020; 45 (06) 1142-1167
  • 97 Patwardhan B, Warude D, Pushpangadan P, Bhatt N. Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine: a comparative overview. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2005; 2 (04) 465-473
  • 98 Abimbola S. Knowledge from the global South is in the global South. J Med Ethics 2023; 49: 337-338