RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771237
Refining Clinician Workflow as a Means to Improving Catheter Quality Measures
Funding None declared.Abstract
Objective This study aimed to improve the quality measure performance for indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) duration, central venous catheter (CVC) duration, and telemetry duration by redesigning clinical decision support (CDS) tools within the documentation process and order workflow.
Methods The effectiveness of the redesign was evaluated using system standard quality reporting methodology to observe device duration, central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rate preintervention (FY2017) and postintervention (FY2018). Electronic health record (EHR) reporting tools were used to evaluate CDS alert data both preintervention and postintervention.
Results Total device duration and line days per patient days were reduced for CVC (12.8% [0.305–0.266]) and IUC (4.68% [0.171–0.163]). Mean telemetry duration was reduced by 16.94% (3.72–3.09 days), and CDS alert volume decreased 18.6% from a preintervention mean of 1.18 alerts per patient per day (81,190 total alerts) to a postintervention mean of 0.96 alerts per patient per day (61,899 total alerts). Both CLABSI (2.8% [1.07–1.04]) and CAUTI (8.1% [1.61–1.48]) rates were reduced, resulting in approximately $926,000 in savings.
Conclusion In this novel model, the redesigned CDS tools improved clinician response to CDS alerts, prompting providers to take action on relevant orders that automatically updated the clinical documentation to reflect their actions. The study demonstrated that effective redesign of CDS tools within the documentation process and order workflow can reduce device duration, improve patient outcomes, and decrease CDS alert volume.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
As a quality improvement project, this evaluation does not constitute human subject research as defined at 45CFR46.102 - Subpart A: Basic U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects. IRB approval was unnecessary. The authors have no conflict of interest.
Data Availability Statement
Due to commercial restrictions, data cannot be shared publicly, so supporting data are not available.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 20. April 2023
Angenommen: 18. Mai 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. Juli 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Non-federal acute care hospital electronic health record adoption. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2017 Zugriff am 08. Juni 2023 unter: https://www.healthit.gov/data/quickstats/non-federal-acute-care-hospital-electronic-health-record-adoption
- 2 Phansalkar S, Wright A, Kuperman GJ. et al. Towards meaningful medication-related clinical decision support: recommendations for an initial implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2011; 2 (01) 50-62
- 3 Johnson SG, Speedie S, Simon G, Kumar V, Westra BL. Quantifying the effect of data quality on the validity of an eMeasure. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1012-1021
- 4 Wahi MM, Dukach N. Visualizing infection surveillance data for policymaking using open source dashboarding. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 534-542
- 5 Flatow VH, Ibragimova N, Divino CM. et al. Quality outcomes in the surgical intensive care unit after electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (04) 611-618
- 6 Clarke MA, Steege LM, Moore JL, Koopman RJ, Belden JL, Kim MS. Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (01) 169-190
- 7 Koopman RJ, Steege LMB, Moore JL. et al. Physician information needs and electronic health records (EHRs): time to reengineer the clinic note. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (03) 316-323
- 8 Barlow RD. Decision support at work. Information technology helps to drive workflow improvement. Health Manag Technol 2015; 36 (07) 6-9
- 9 Footracer KG. Alert fatigue in electronic health records. JAAPA 2015; 28 (07) 41-42
- 10 Schreier DJ, Lovely JK. Optimizing clinical monitoring tools to enhance patient review by pharmacists. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (03) 621-628
- 11 Sutton JM, Ash SR, Al Makki A, Kalakeche R. A daily hospital progress note that increases physician usability of the electronic health record by facilitating a problem-oriented approach to the patient and reducing physician clerical burden. Perm J 2019; 23: 18-221
- 12 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). Analytics. Electronic medical record adoption model (EMRAM). Zugriff am 08. Juni 2023 unter: https://www.himssanalytics.org/emram
- 13 Birge J, Fleharty B. “Inpatient Quality Metric Checklist”. Epic Systems Corporation, August 2019, User Group Meeting (UGM), Verona, WI. Lecture
- 14 Birge J, Fleharty B. “Driving Quality Improvements with Regulatory Requirements”. Epic Systems Corporation, May 2018, Expert User Group (XGM), Verona, WI. Lecture
- 15 Clarke MA, Belden JL, Kim MS. Comparing Computerized Physician Order Entry Usability between Expert and Novice Primary Care Physicians. Paper presented: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. ; January 12–15, 2015 ; Lisbon, Portugal; 304-311
- 16 Clarke MA, Belden JL, Kim MS. Usability Evaluation of an EHR to Improve Physician Performance. Cham: Springer; 2020: 239-245
- 17 Windle JR, Windle TA, Shamavu KY. et al. Roadmap to a more useful and usable electronic health record. Cardiovasc Digital Health J 2021; 2 (06) 301-311
- 18 Yeow RY, Strohbehn GW, Kagan CM. et al. Eliminating inappropriate telemetry monitoring: an evidence-based implementation guide. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178 (07) 971-978
- 19 Chong-Yik R, Bennett AL, Milani RV, Morin DP. Cost-saving opportunities with appropriate utilization of cardiac telemetry. Am J Cardiol 2018; 122 (09) 1570-1573
- 20 Chahine J, Thapa B, Gosai F. et al. Interventions to decrease overuse of cardiac monitoring (telemetry) when transitioning from the intensive care unit to the regular nursing floor. Cureus 2019; 11 (03) e4311
- 21 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Zugriff am 05. März 2023 unter: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/ca_uti/uti.html
- 22 Bureau of Health Care Analysis & Data Dissemination. Definitions. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. Zugriff am 09. März 2023 unter: https://health.mo.gov/data/hai/definition.php#clabir
- 23 National Cancer Institute. Central venous access catheter. National Institutes of Health. Zugriff am 05. März 2023 unter: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/central-venous-access-catheter
- 24 Haddadin Y, Annamaraju P, Regunath H. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2022
- 25 HealthIT.gov. Clinical Decision Support. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Zugriff am 03. Mai 2023 unter: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/clinical-decision-support
- 26 National Healthcare Safety Network. Urinary Tract Infection (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [CAUTI] and Non-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [UTI]) Events. Device-associated Module: Urinary Tract Infection. 2023 . Accessed June 8, 203 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/7psccauticurrent.pdf
- 27 Use of Violent Restraints: System. Samaritan Health Services. Zugriff am 08. Juni 2034 unter: https://www.samhealth.org/-/media/SHS/Documents/English/003-General-SHS-Admin-Other/Professional-Development/Provider-Orientation/Policies/Use-of-Violent-Restraint-003.pdf?la=en&hash=A1D4A0A509121EF8C01385B70C2E21B7277E7E34
- 28 National Healthcare Safety Network. General Key Terms. Atlanta, GA: : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023
- 29 Nebraska Medicine. Checklist aims to help providers improve patient safety. University of Nebraska Medical Center. Zugriff am 05. März 2023 unter: https://www.unmc.edu/newsroom/2017/07/12/checklist-aims-to-help-providers-improve-patient-safety/
- 30 Disabilities NCoBDaD. Learn about healthcare-associated venous thromboembolism. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Zugriff am 05. März 2023 unter: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dvt/ha-vte.html
- 31 Venous Thromboembolism. American Heart Association. Accessed March 5, 2023 at: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/venous-thromboembolism
- 32 Greenberg RG, Cochran KM, Smith PB. et al. Effect of Catheter Dwell Time on Risk of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Infants. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (06) 1080-1086
- 33 Texas Healthcare Safety Network. Definitions of Common Terms. Texas Department of State Health Services. Zugriff am 13. März 2023 unter: http://txhsn.dshs.texas.gov/HCSReports/Definitions.aspx
- 34 Delaware Health and Social Services. Standardized Infection Ratios and Rates for Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) and Central Line Utilization Ratios Delaware Intensive Care Units. 2011 Zugriff am 08. Juni 2023 unter: https://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dph/epi/files/clabsi2011_apr_jun.pdf
- 35 Shillinglaw G. The concept of attributable cost. J Account Res 1963; 1 (01) 73-85
- 36 Stoltzfus KB, Bhakta M, Shankweiler C, Mount RR, Gibson C. Appropriate utilisation of cardiac telemetry monitoring: a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8 (02) e000560
- 37 McGreevey III JD, Mallozzi CP, Perkins RM, Shelov E, Schreiber R. Reducing alert burden in electronic health records: state of the art recommendations from four health systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 1-12