RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771238
Surgeon-Perceived Requirements for a Platform to Integrate Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice
Authors
Funding None.

Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized, validated tools that translate subjective patient-reported concerns about their health status into quantitative data. PROMs were initially developed as research instruments; however, they have more recently been recognized as important clinical tools. PROMs have not been widely adopted into surgical practices and this study sought to uncover the system requirements of a platform to integrate PROMs into surgical practice, as perceived by surgeons.
Methods Semi-structured interviews were performed from November 2019 until August of 2020. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was achieved. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative interview data were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach.
Results Analysis revealed 12 system features desired by surgeons for a platform to integrate PROMs into clinical use. These were further grouped into four unique overarching themes. Surgeons asserted that the platform must (1) be user-friendly, (2) promote information transparency, (3) incorporate validated questionnaires while still allowing for some degree of customizability, and (4) support the collection and display of longitudinal data.
Conclusions Health care systems planning to develop a platform to integrate PROMs into their clinical practices should investigate the feasibility of the system features identified as essential by this study. While surgeons represent an important stakeholder group when designing a new platform for use in surgical practice, it will also be crucial to explore the features desired by patients before designing or adopting a platform for clinical use.
Keywords
patient-reported outcome - patient-reported outcome measures - informatics - system requirements - electronic health record - surgeryNote
This work was previously presented at the 2020 American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Virtual Clinical Informatics Conference (CIC).
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 13. Juni 2022
Angenommen: 23. März 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. Juli 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009; 146 (03) 435-443
- 2 Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R. et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (14) 1480-1501
- 3 Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC. et al. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA 2017; 318 (02) 197-198
- 4 Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Dunphy C, Urchek J, Lapin B. Neurologic provider views on patient-reported outcomes including depression screening. Neurol Clin Pract 2018; 8 (02) 86-92
- 5 Turner GM, Litchfield I, Finnikin S, Aiyegbusi OL, Calvert M. General practitioners' views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2020; 21 (01) 14
- 6 AMCP Partnership Forum. AMCP Partnership Forum: improving quality, value, and outcomes with patient-reported outcomes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2018; 24 (03) 304-310
- 7 Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM. et al. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35 (04) 575-582
- 8 Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E. et al. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2018; 2: 42
- 9 Black N, Varaganum M, Hutchings A. Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23 (07) 534-542
- 10 Baumhauer JF, Bozic KJ. Value-based healthcare: patient-reported outcomes in clinical decision making. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (06) 1375-1378
- 11 Medbery RL, Fernandez FG, Khullar OV. ERAS and patient reported outcomes in thoracic surgery: a review of current data. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11 (Suppl. 07) S976-S986
- 12 Tatman LM, Obremskey WT. Patient reported outcomes: the foundation of value. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33 (Suppl. 07) S53-S55
- 13 Khalil LS, Darrith B, Franovic S, Davis JJ, Weir RM, Banka TR. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health short forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (06) 1540-1544
- 14 Lagendijk M, Desantis S, Nakhlis F. et al. Impact of surgical complications on patient reported outcomes (PROs) following nipple sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2020; 220 (05) 1230-1234
- 15 Briffa N. The employment of patient-reported outcome measures to communicate the likely benefits of surgery. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2018; 9: 263-266
- 16 Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN. et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (02) 149-162
- 17 Cronin RM, Conway D, Condon D, Jerome RN, Byrne DW, Harris PA. Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (11) 1470-1480
- 18 Ayers DC, Yousef M, Zheng H, Yang W, Franklin PD. The prevalence and predictors of patient dissatisfaction 5-years following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (6S): S121-S128
- 19 Davidson GH, Haukoos JS, Feldman LS. Practical guide to assessment of patient-reported outcomes. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (05) 432-433
- 20 Snyder CF, Blackford AL, Wolff AC, Carducci MA, Herman JM, Wu AW. PatientViewpoint Scientific Advisory Board. Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Psychooncology 2013; 22 (04) 895-901
- 21 Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK. et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res 2012; 21 (08) 1305-1314
- 22 Medbery RL, Fernandez FG, Khullar OV. Patient-reported outcomes: time to integrate into outcomes reporting?. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 31 (04) 856-860
- 23 Abola RE, Bennett-Guerrero E, Kent ML. et al; Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) 2 Workgroup. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative joint consensus statement on patient-reported outcomes in an enhanced recovery pathway. Anesth Analg 2018; 126 (06) 1874-1882
- 24 Shapiro M, Johnston D, Wald J, Mon D. Patient-Generated Health Data. RTI International; 2012. . Accessed June 14, 2023 at: https://www.rti.org/publication/patient-generated-health-data-white-paper/fulltext.pdf
- 25 Jensen RE, Rothrock NE, DeWitt EM. et al. The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Med Care 2015; 53 (02) 153-159
- 26 Greiner P, Sawka A, Imison E. Patient and physician perspectives on MSdialog, an electronic PRO diary in multiple sclerosis. Patient 2015; 8 (06) 541-550
- 27 Avery KNL, Richards HS, Portal A. et al. Developing a real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following cancer-related surgery. BMC Cancer 2019; 19 (01) 463
- 28 Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Steinger B. et al; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 106 (05) 826-838
- 29 Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q. et al. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (08) 994-1000
- 30 Jones RS, Stukenborg GJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) use in surgical care: a scoping study. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224 (03) 245-254.e1
- 31 Basch E, Snyder C. Overcoming barriers to integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and electronic health records. Ann Oncol 2017; 28 (10) 2332-2333
- 32 Mou D, Sisodia RC, Castillo-Angeles M. et al. The Surgeon's Perceived Value of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): an exploratory qualitative study of 5 different surgical subspecialties. Ann Surg 2022; 275 (03) 500-505
- 33 Zhang R, Burgess ER, Reddy MC. et al. Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open 2019; 2 (01) 73-80
- 34 Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP. et al. Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract 2014; 10 (04) e215-e222
- 35 Hartzler AL, Izard JP, Dalkin BL, Mikles SP, Gore JL. Design and feasibility of integrating personalized PRO dashboards into prostate cancer care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (01) 38-47
- 36 Accenture. Conceptualizing a data infrastructure for the capture, use, and sharing of patient-generated health data in care delivery and research through 2024. Secondary conceptualizing a data infrastructure for the capture, use, and sharing of patient-generated health data in care delivery and research through 2024. 2016. Zugriff am 21. Januar 2018 unter: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/Draft_White_Paper_PGHD_Policy_Framework.pdf
- 37 Bowens FM, Frye PA, Jones WA. Health information technology: integration of clinical workflow into meaningful use of electronic health records. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2010; 7 (Fall): 1d
- 38 Pompili C, Novoa N, Balduyck B. ESTS Quality of life and Patient Safety Working Group. Clinical evaluation of quality of life: a survey among members of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 21 (04) 415-419
- 39 Snyder C, Wu AW. eds. Users' Guide to Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Electronic Health Records. NIH Collaboratory/PCORNet Grand Rounds. October 13, 2017. Accessed July 11, 2023 at: https://dcricollab.dcri.duke.edu/sites/NIHKR/KR/17-10-13%20GR-Slides.pdf 2017
- 40 Tevis SE, James TA, Kuerer HM. et al. Patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25 (10) 2839-2845
- 41 Nelson JA, Chu JJ, Dabic S. et al. Moving towards patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: implementation lessons from the BREAST-Q. Qual Life Res 2023; 32 (01) 115-125
- 42 Basch E, Abernethy AP. Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (08) 954-956
- 43 Kornblith AB, Dowell JM, Herndon II JE. et al. Telephone monitoring of distress in patients aged 65 years or older with advanced stage cancer: a cancer and leukemia group B study. Cancer 2006; 107 (11) 2706-2714
- 44 Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12 (05) 559-568
- 45 PROMIS. PROMIS overview [Inter-net]. Chapel Hill, NC: PROMISNetwork Center. Zugriff am 09. Februar 2016 unter: http://www.nihpromis.org/about/overview
- 46 Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the Most Out of PROMS. Putting Health Outcomes at the Heart of NHS Decision-Making. London, UK: The King's Fund; 2010
- 47
Churruca K,
Pomare C,
Ellis LA.
et al.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific
measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect 2021; 24 (04) 1015-1024
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 48 Chen Q, Mariano ER, Lu AC. Enhanced recovery pathways and patient-reported outcome measures in gynaecological oncology. Anaesthesia 2021; 76 (Suppl. 04) 131-138
- 49 Petersen MA, Larsen H, Pedersen L, Sonne N, Groenvold M. Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: comparing patient and physician assessments. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42 (08) 1159-1166
- 50 Fuzesi S, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Atisha D, Pusic AL. Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study. Breast 2017; 33: 44-49
- 51 Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR. et al. Impact of cultural and linguistic factors on symptom reporting by patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102 (10) 732-738
- 52 Boyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study. Implement Sci 2014; 9: 84
- 53 Hildon Z, Allwood D, Black N. Patients' and clinicians' views of comparing the performance of providers of surgery: a qualitative study. Health Expect 2015; 18 (03) 366-378
- 54 Neuburger J, Hutchings A, van der Meulen J, Black N. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to compare the providers of surgery: does the choice of measure matter?. Med Care 2013; 51 (06) 517-523
- 55 de Blacam C, Healy C, Quinn L. et al. Is satisfaction with surgeon a determining factor in patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (09) 1248-1253