CC BY 4.0 · ACI open 2023; 07(02): e79-e86
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775971
Case Report

Curriculum for Early Exposure to Clinical Informatics and Data Science for Noninformatics Trainees to Promote Interest and Inclusion in Informatics

Akshay Ravi
1   Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Benjamin Weia
1   Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Matthew Sakumoto
1   Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
2   Department of Medicine, Sutter Health, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Aris Oates
3   Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Xinran Liu
1   Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding None declared.

Abstract

Background Curricula aimed at increasing exposure to informatics and practical data analytics among medical trainees could increase their effectiveness in clinical research, quality improvement, and clinical operations.

Objectives The Clinical Informatics Data Science (CI-DS) pathway is a cross-disciplinary curriculum aimed at improving informatics exposure among medical trainees. We describe the development of this novel curriculum, the inaugural cohort, and lessons learned.

Methods The CI-DS pathway is framed around upfront informatics didactics followed by a longitudinal, experiential training focused on mentorship, clinical data extraction/machine learning, and health technology governance. The curriculum was evaluated based on pre- and postpathway surveys completed by learners and logs of the elective activities selected by learners.

Results The CI-DS pathway attracted 19 learners across 12 medical subspecialties, from medical students to fellows. Baseline surveys showed limited exposure to informatics across learners. The top three longitudinal activities completed were participating in electronic health record (EHR) governance meetings, data science supplemental courses, and designated mentorship meetings. Comparison of baseline with postpathway surveys demonstrated significant improvements in learner self-reported confidence in appraising an EHR modification ticket, accessing UCSF's deidentified data, exploring a database with basic structured query language (SQL), extracting data using SQL, and interpreting machine learning models.

Conclusion An early exposure curriculum in clinical informatics with training in data extraction and governance can successfully recruit a diverse array of learners and improve confidence in practical informatics skills. We reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of this curriculum, and summarize the lessons learned to guide others in creating similar curricula for noninformatics clinicians.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed and exempted by the UCSF Institutional Review Board.




Publication History

Received: 30 March 2023

Accepted: 16 August 2023

Article published online:
01 November 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Hersh WR, Gorman PN, Biagioli FE, Mohan V, Gold JA, Mejicano GC. Beyond information retrieval and electronic health record use: competencies in clinical informatics for medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract 2014; 5: 205-212
  • 2 Fridsma DB. Health informatics: a required skill for 21st century clinicians. BMJ 2018; 362: k3043
  • 3 Silverman H, Cohen T, Fridsma D. The evolution of a novel biomedical informatics curriculum for medical students. Acad Med 2012; 87 (01) 84-90
  • 4 Gardner RM, Friedman NA, Carlson M, Bradham TS, Barrett TW. Impact of revised triage to improve throughput in an ED with limited traditional fast track population. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36 (01) 124-127
  • 5 Longhurst CA, Pageler NM, Palma JP. et al. Early experiences of accredited clinical informatics fellowships. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (04) 829-834
  • 6 Hare AJ, Soegaard Ballester JM, Gabriel PE, Adusumalli S, Hanson III CW. Training digital natives to transform healthcare: a 5-tiered approach for integrating clinical informatics into undergraduate medical education. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 30 (01) 139-143
  • 7 Breil B, Fritz F, Thiemann V, Dugas M. Multidisciplinary education in medical informatics – a course for medical and informatics students. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160 (Pt 1): 581-584
  • 8 Mai MV, Luo BT, Orenstein EW, Luberti AA. A model for clinical informatics education for residents: addressing an unmet need. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 261-267
  • 9 Turer RW, Arribas M, Balgord SM. et al. Clinical informatics training during emergency medicine residency: the University of Michigan experience. AEM Educ Train 2020; 5 (03) e10518
  • 10 Singer JS, Cheng EM, Baldwin K, Pfeffer MA. UCLA Health Physician Informaticist Committee. The UCLA Health Resident Informaticist Program - a novel clinical informatics training program. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (04) 832-840
  • 11 Andriole DA, Wolfson RK. The physician-investigator workforce: looking ahead. Acad Med 2021; 96 (04) 486-489
  • 12 Deilkås ET, Rosta J, Baathe F. et al. Physician participation in quality improvement work- interest and opportunity: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Prim Care 2022; 23 (01) 267
  • 13 Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. 3rd ed.. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016. . Accessed May 2, 2022 at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=979875&site=ehost-live
  • 14 Kohlwes RJ, Shunk RL, Avins A, Garber J, Bent S, Shlipak MG. The PRIME curriculum. Clinical research training during residency. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (05) 506-509
  • 15 Torre DM, Daley BJ, Sebastian JL, Elnicki DM. Overview of current learning theories for medical educators. Am J Med 2006; 119 (10) 903-907
  • 16 Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18 (01) 38
  • 17 McCoy AB, Russo EM, Johnson KB. et al. Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (06) 1050-1059
  • 18 Onyekaba G, Mauch JT, Barrero C. et al. Does dedicated research time during residency predict resident academic productivity and a future academic career?. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (03, Suppl 3): S293-S295
  • 19 Williams BR, Agel JA, Van Heest AE. Protected time for research during orthopaedic residency correlates with an increased number of resident publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (13) e73
  • 20 Shalaby M, Yaich S, Donnelly J, Chippendale R, DeOliveira MC, Noronha C. X + Y scheduling models for internal medicine residency programs-a look back and a look forward. J Grad Med Educ 2014; 6 (04) 639-642