Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Feasibility of Online Survey for Postshunt Hydrocephalus Follow-Up

Abstract

Objective Children with hydrocephalus need regular monitoring following shunt surgery. A parent-completed assessment tool was used successfully in follow-up of postshunt hydrocephalus children in the recent pandemic.

Methods The Ages & and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) was sent via WhatsApp to parents of 40 postventriculoperitoneal (post-VP) shunt hydrocephalus children (7–57 months). Assessment was done by the parents/guardians in five domains over a period of 3 months. The completed questionnaires were analyzed and children with below the cutoff scores were called to the hospital for further evaluations and intervention if necessary.

Result Questionnaires of 25 children were found completed and analyzed. There were 16 males and 18 children had aqueductal stenosis and 11 had meningomyelocele. Eighteen children with failed/borderline (11/7) ASQ scores were called for further evaluation and in all but one the scores obtained by the parents and clinical psychologists were found comparable. Two children needed hospital admissions for shunt revision and adjustment of anticonvulsant medicines.

Conclusion The ASQ could be a useful tool, as parents can conduct the test at home and attend clinics in case of failed or borderline scores for further developmental assessment and/or intervention. This can be used as a routine monitoring tool in other clinical situations as well.

Keywords

ages and stages questionnaires - hydrocephalus - development monitoring - screening tool

Authors' Contribution

H.K.D. was responsible for study conception, design, questionnaire administration, analysis, and manuscript preparation. M.B. contributed to questionnaire administration, evaluation, communication with parents, coordination with psychologist, and manuscript preparation. M.D. contributed to questionnaire administration, communication, clinical and psychological evaluation, and preparation of tables.

Publication History

Article published online:
31 October 2023

• References

• 1 Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 405-420
• 2 Fischer VJ, Servili C, Morris JE. et al. Developmental screening tools: feasibility of use at primary health level in low and middle-income settings. Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc 2012; 60: S304
• 3 Scherzer AL, Chhagan M, Kauchali S, Susser E. Global perspective on early diagnosis and intervention for children with developmental delays and disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012; 54 (12) 1079-1084
• 4 Scherzer AL. Experience in Cambodia with the use of a culturally relevant developmental milestone chart for children in low- and middle-income countries. J Policy Pract Intell Disabil 2009; 6: 287-292
• 5 Hix-Small H, Marks K, Squires J, Nickel R. Impact of implementing developmental screening at 12 and 24 months in a pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (02) 381-389
• 6 Drotar D, Stancin T, Dworkin PH, Sices L, Wood S. Selecting developmental surveillance and screening tools. Pediatr Rev 2008; 29 (10) e52-e58
• 7 Marks K, Hix-Small H, Clark K, Newman J. Lowering developmental screening thresholds and raising quality improvement for preterm children. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (06) 1516-1523
• 8 Sices L, Stancin T, Kirchner L, Bauchner H. PEDS and ASQ developmental screening tests may not identify the same children. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (04) e640-e647
• 9 Squires J, Potter L, Bricker D. The ASQ User's Guide. 2nd ed.. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company; 1999
• 10 Glascoe FP. Parents' concerns about children's development: prescreening technique or screening test?. Pediatrics 1997; 99 (04) 522-528
• 11 Juneja M, Mohanty M, Jain R, Ramji S. Ages and Stages Questionnaire as a screening tool for developmental delay in Indian children. Indian Pediatr 2012; 49 (06) 457-461
• 12 Yue A, Jiang Q, Wang B. et al. Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley scales of infant development III in China. PLoS One 2019; 14 (09) e0221675
• 13 Khan NZ, Muslima H, Shilpi AB. et al. Validation of a home-based neurodevelopmental screening tool for under 2-year-old children in Bangladesh. Child Care Health Dev 2013; 39 (05) 643-650
• 14 Bhave A, Bhargava R, Kumar R. Development and validation of a new Lucknow Development Screen for Indian children aged 6 months to 2 years. J Child Neurol 2010; 25 (01) 57-60
• 15 Jain R, Arora A, Anand R, Malhotra S, Mittal M, Juneja M. Designing and validation of a Hindi language parent self-report developmental screening tool. Indian Pediatr 2017; 54 (07) 550-555
• 16 Nair MK, George B, Philip E, Lekshmi MA, Haran JC, Sathy N. Trivandrum developmental screening chart. Indian Pediatr 1991; 28 (08) 869-872
• 17 Garg P, Ha MT, Eastwood J. et al. Health professional perceptions regarding screening tools for developmental surveillance for children in a multicultural part of Sydney, Australia. BMC Fam Pract 2018; 19 (01) 42
• 18 King TM, Tandon SD, Macias MM. et al. Implementing developmental screening and referrals: lessons learned from a national project. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (02) 350-360