CC BY 4.0 · Avicenna J Med 2023; 13(04): 215-222
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776044
Original Article

Assessing the Merits and Effectiveness of Peer Teaching in Small Groups through the Employment of Different Learning Media

1   Department of Community Medicine, Datta Meghe Medical College, Off-campus Centre of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
,
1   Department of Community Medicine, Datta Meghe Medical College, Off-campus Centre of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background Peer teaching is a well-acknowledged method to facilitate teaching and learning among medical students. The objective of the study was to assess the merits and effectiveness of peer teaching in small groups using a student-centered approach through the employment of different learning media.

Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted among a group of 34 students from third professional year. Purposive sampling was used, wherein students were subdivided into five small groups. At the beginning, a pretest consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions was conducted on the topic “Epidemiology of Hypertension.” This topic was further subdivided into five subtopics, and five separate learning media (viz., video, PowerPoint, white board, chalk-and-talk, and chart) were allocated using the lottery method. Each group discussed the allotted topic and then presented their findings in the large group using the assigned learning media, while other groups gave feedback, and the best group was decided through multivoting. Posttest was administered and the results were compared with the pretest. Data entry was done in Microsoft Excel and analysis was done using SPSS 16. Descriptive statistics and paired t-test was used to compare the results in pretest and posttest at p level < 0.05.

Results This innovative session of peer teaching featured 34 students, with a mean age of 22 ± 1.3 years. While carrying out the Kirkpatrick Level 1 evaluation, almost 90% students liked the role of the facilitator in stimulating interest in the topic. There was a mean average increase of 1.7 marks on comparing the scores of posttest with pretest (Kirkpatrick Level 2), and the reported difference was statistically significant. Joyful learning 24 (66.7%) and group discussion 23 (63.9%) emerged as the most liked aspects of the session.

Conclusion In conclusion, peer teaching through learning media is an effective method as it promotes active learning, improves communication skills, and improves the academic performance of students. Peer teaching using different learning media proved to be quite effective in improvement of knowledge about epidemiology of hypertension, the pros and cons of different learning media, and encouraged creativity among students.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 October 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Tung EL, Avery LL. Effectively incorporating peer teaching to improve radiology education-radiology in training. Radiology 2022; 303 (03) E32-E34
  • 2 Roberts V, Malone K, Moore P, Russell-Webster T, Caulfield R. Peer teaching medical students during a pandemic. Med Educ Online 2020; 25 (01) 1772014
  • 3 Zhang H, Liao AWX, Goh SH, Wu XV, Yoong SQ. Effectiveness of peer teaching in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2022; 118: 105499
  • 4 Masters K. Edgar Dale's Pyramid of Learning in medical education: a literature review. Med Teach 2013; 35 (11) e1584-e1593
  • 5 Yang MM, Golden BP, Cameron KA. et al. Learning through teaching: peer teaching and mentoring experiences among third-year medical students. Teach Learn Med 2022; 34 (04) 360-367
  • 6 Avonts M, Michels NR, Bombeke K. et al. Does peer teaching improve academic results and competencies during medical school? A mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22 (01) 431
  • 7 Srivastava TK, Waghmare LS, Mishra VP, Rawekar AT, Quazi N, Jagzape AT. Peer teaching to foster learning in physiology. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (08) JC01-JC06
  • 8 Cooper AL, Elnicki DM. Resource utilisation patterns of third-year medical students. Clin Teach 2011; 8 (01) 43-47
  • 9 Sandars J, Homer M, Pell G, Croker T. Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Med Teach 2008; 30 (03) 308-312
  • 10 Jayakumar N, Srirathan D, Shah R. et al. Which peer teaching methods do medical students prefer?. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2016; 29 (02) 142-147
  • 11 Schuetz E, Obirei B, Salat D, Scholz J, Hann D, Dethleffsen K. A large-scale peer teaching programme - acceptance and benefit. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2017; 125: 71-79
  • 12 O'Shaughnessy SM. Peer teaching as a means of enhancing communication skills in anaesthesia training: trainee perspectives. Ir J Med Sci 2018; 187 (01) 207-213
  • 13 Guenther S, Shadbolt N, Roberts C, Clark T. Evaluating peer teaching about chronic disease. Clin Teach 2014; 11 (07) 541-545
  • 14 Omar F, Zaheer M, Ahmed M. Effectiveness of peer teaching in medical education: medical student's perspective. Adv Med Educ Pract 2018; 9: 199-201
  • 15 Green M, Legard C. Peer-teaching could help bring sustainable healthcare into the medical education curriculum. Med Teach 2020; 42 (05) 598-599
  • 16 Gutmann J, Kühbeck F, Berberat PO, Fischer MR, Engelhardt S, Sarikas A. Use of learning media by undergraduate medical students in pharmacology: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2015; 10 (04) e0122624
  • 17 Hikmandayani AM, Ahmad M, Syarif S, , Budu, Idris I. , Stang. Learning media based on augmented reality (AR) increased the skill of physical examination of the integumentary system of pregnant women in midwifery students. Gac Sanit 2021; 35 (Suppl. 02) S302-S305