PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2024; 13(01): 025-029
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776739
Original Article

Patient Satisfaction of Porcelain Veneer at the Odonto-Stomatology Hospital, Vietnam

Chu Thi Quynh Huong
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Ha Noi National Hospital of Odonto-stomatology, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Vietnam
,
Trinh Dinh Hai
2   VNU School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to study the clinical characteristics and patient satisfaction of the porcelain veneer aesthetic restoration at the Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital, Vietnam.

Materials and Methods This is a cross-sectional descriptive study of 94 teeth in 12 patients with indications for glass-ceramic restorations at the Department of Prosthodontics at the Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital during the period from July 2021 to December 2022. Porcelain veneer aesthetic restorations in patients were evaluated using FDI World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of veneer restorations for the esthetic parameters, functional parameters, biological parameters, and reliability. The evaluation was done immediately after installation and after 3 months. Evaluation of aesthetics, function, biology, and satisfaction was done using a scale (Scale 1–5). Data were analyzed using SPSS 18 software and descriptive statistics were calculated.

Results It showed that the achieved results were good in terms of good to very good shape (100%) and good to very good color (98.8%). Three months after installation, the veneer restorations were stable in shape and color. The restorations were aesthetically and functionally satisfactory with no signs of broken or detachment.

Conclusion Porcelain veneer restorations helped to improve the tooth shape and color. The patients were satisfied with the veneer restorations.

Keywords

porcelain veneers - veneer restoration - satisfaction


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Dezember 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Meijering AC, Roeters FJ, Mulder J, Creugers NH. Patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations. J Dent 1997; 25 (06) 493-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Strassler HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent 2007; 55 (07) 686-694 , quiz 695–696, 712
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Monaraks R, Leevailoj C. The longevity of ceramic veneers: clinical evaluation of mechanical, biologic and aesthetic performances of ceramic veneers, a 7-year retrospective study. J Dent Assoc Thai 2018; 68 (03) 288-301
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Srimaneepong V, Heboyan A, Zafar MS. et al. Fixed prosthetic restorations and periodontal health: a narrative review. J Funct Biomater 2022; 13 (01) 15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary dental ceramic materials, a review: chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties, indications for use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6 (09) 1742-1755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vaiani L, Boccaccio A, Uva AE. et al. Ceramic materials for biomedical applications: an overview on properties and fabrication processes. J Funct Biomater 2023; 14 (03) 146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zhou M, Zhang X, Zhang Y. et al. Construction of nanostructured glass-zirconia to improve the interface stability of dental bilayer zirconia. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2023; 13 (04) 678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kongkiatkamon S, Booranasophone K, Tongtaksin A, Kiatthanakorn V, Rokaya D. Comparison of fracture load of the four translucent zirconia crowns. Molecules 2021; 26 (17) 5308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jurado CA, Villalobos-Tinoco J, Watanabe H, Sanchez-Hernandez R, Tsujimoto A. Novel translucent monolithic zirconia fixed restorations in the esthetic zone. Clin Case Rep 2022; 10 (03) e05499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lee YK. Translucency of dental ceramic, post and bracket. Materials (Basel) 2015; 8 (11) 7241-7249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shi HY, Pang R, Yang J. et al. Overview of several typical ceramic materials for restorative dentistry. BioMed Res Int 2022; 2022: 8451445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M. et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14 (04) 349-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sulaya K, Guttal SS. Clinical evaluation of performance of single unit polyetheretherketone crown restoration-a pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020; 20 (01) 38-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zhao J, Gao X, Chen S, Lin H, Li Z, Lin X. Hydrophobic or superhydrophobic modification of cement-based materials: a systematic review. Compos B Eng 2022; 243: 110104
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar