Assessment of Microhardness of Bulk-Fill Class II Resin Composite Restorations Performed by Preclinical Students: An In Vitro Study

Abstract

Objectives A comparable performance between bulk-fill composites (BFCs) and progressively inserted conventional resin composite (CRC) has been observed in previous studies. However, a significant number of dental institutions in India continue to employ incremental techniques for RC restorations during preclinical studies. But as BFCs are gaining popularity, they may soon be a part of the curriculum for dental students. The aim of this study was to assess the microhardness and the polymerization efficiency of bulk-fill composites versus CRC in class II slot preparations restored by second-year dental students on ivorine mandibular first molar teeth with high-intensity (HI) and low-intensity (LI) light-curing units using the standard mesial slot preparation technique.

Material and Methods Fifty preclinical dental students of second year of a dental college were recruited for the study on a voluntary basis. During their preclinical instructions, all participants were taught and made to practice the handling and curing techniques for two-surface RC restorations for 4 months. Each student was asked to perform four RC restorations: CRC-HI, CRC-LI, BFC-HI, and BFC LI. Assessment of microhardness was done using the Vickers microhardness (VMH) test.

Statistical analysis One-way and multivariate analysis of variance and Bonferroni 's post hoc test tests were used for data analysis.

Results The results showed a significant decrease in the VMH readings in the horizontal axis, progressing from the uppermost to the lowermost positions (p > 0.05). In all the examined groups, the VMH values at the deepest reading locations were found to be higher than 80% of the values observed at the occlusal surface reading locations. Statistically significant associations were seen between the RC type and the light source used in the VMH readings conducted (p > 0.05). However, no significant correlation was identified between the type of light source and the vertical VMH readings (p > 0.05).

Conclusion Instructing dental students to place RC restorations using CRC or BFC materials together with both HI and LI light-curing protocols is safe and can be considered for preclinical studies.

Keywords

dental students - Vickers microhardness - preclinical studies - resin composite - bulk-fill

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Februar 2024

• References

• 1 Riva YR, Rahman SF. Dental composite resin: a review. Paper presented at: the 4th International Symposium of Biomedical Engineering's Recent Progress in Biomaterials, Drugs Development, Health, and Medical Devices; July 22–24, 2019; Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
• 2 Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC. et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2019; 35 (10) e249-e264
• 3 Ilie N, Hilton TJ, Heintze SD. et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance: resin composites—part I. Mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2017; 33 (08) 880-894
• 4 Sokolowski G, Szczesio A, Bociong K. et al. Dental resin cements: the influence of water sorption on contraction stress changes and hydroscopic expansion. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11 (06) 973
• 5 Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42 (08) 993-1000
• 6 Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J 2017; 222 (05) 337-344
• 7 Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19 (02) 95-109
• 8 Ajaj RA. Relative microhardness and flexural strength of different bulk fill resin composite restorative materials. J Am Sci 2015; 11 (07) 155-159
• 9 Awad MM, Salem WS, Almuhaizaa M, Aljeaidi Z. Contemporary teaching of direct posterior composite restorations in Saudi dental schools. Saudi J Dent Res 2017; 8: 42-51
• 10 Tirapelli C. Is the clinical performance of incremental and bulk-fill resin composite different?. Evid Based Dent 2022; 23 (02) 84
• 11 Saati K, Khansari S, Mahdisiar F, Valizadeh S. Evaluation of microhardness of two bulk-fill composite resins compared to a conventional composite resin on surface and in different depths. J Dent (Shiraz) 2022; 23 (01) 58-64
• 12 Tiba A, Zeller GG, Estrich CG, Hong A. A laboratory evaluation of bulk-fill versus traditional multi-increment-fill resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144 (10) 1182-1183
• 13 Sidhu P, Sultan OS, Math SY. et al. Current and future trends in the teaching of direct posterior resin composites in Malaysian dental schools: a cross-sectional study. J Dent 2021; 110: 103683
• 14 Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (01) 221-233
• 15 Arbildo-Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, Lamas-Lara C, Khan AS, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Clinical effectiveness of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 12 (08) 1786
• 16 Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Post-irradiation hardness development, chemical softening, and thermal stability of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites. J Dent 2015; 43 (02) 209-218
• 17 Lins RBE, Aristilde S, Osório JH. et al. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 98: 255-261
• 18 Rizzante FAP, Duque JA, Duarte MAH, Mondelli RFL, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater J 2019; 38 (03) 403-410
• 19 Finan L, Palin WM, Moskwa N, McGinley EL, Fleming GJ. The influence of irradiation potential on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of two bulk-fill flowable RBC base materials. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (08) 906-912
• 20 Pereira R, Giorgi MCC, Lins RBE. et al. Physical and photoelastic properties of bulk-fill and conventional composites. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2018; 10: 287-296
• 21 Marovic D, Panduric V, Tarle Z. et al. Degree of conversion and microhardness of dental composite resin materials. J Mol Struct 2013; 1044: 299-302
• 22 Kim EH, Jung KH, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. Effect of resin thickness on the microhardness and optical properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Restor Dent Endod 2015; 40 (02) 128-135
• 23 Aguiar FH, Lazzari CR, Lima DA, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing tip distance and resin shade on microhardness of a hybrid resin composite. Braz Oral Res 2005; 19 (04) 302-306
• 24 Reis AF, Vestphal M, Amaral RC, Rodrigues JA, Roulet JF, Roscoe MG. Efficiency of polymerization of bulk-fill composite resins: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31: e59
• 25 Hasanain FA, Nassar HM, Ajaj RA. Effect of light curing distance on microhardness profiles of bulk-fill resin composites. Polymers (Basel) 2022; 14 (03) 528
• 26 Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Contraction stress related to composite inorganic content. Dent Mater 2010; 26 (07) 704-709
• 27 Zotti F, Falavigna E, Capocasale G, De Santis D, Albanese M. Microleakage of direct restorations: comparison between bulk-fill and traditional composite resins—systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (04) 755-767
• 28 Mehta V, Fiorillo L, Langaliya A, Obulareddy VT, Cicciu M. The effect of xenograft and platelet-rich plasma in the surgical management of intrabony defects in periodontitis patients: a systematic review. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34 (07) 2222-2227
• 29 Manisha S, Shetty SS, Mehta V, Sa R, Meto A. A comprehensive evaluation of zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement's effectiveness in dental caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Dent J 2023; 11 (09) 211
• 30 Joshi PS, Shetty R, Sarode GS, Mehta V, Chakraborty D. Root anatomy and canal configuration of human permanent mandibular second molar: a systematic review. J Conserv Dent 2021; 24 (04) 298-306
• 31 Mehta V, Kaçani G, Moaleem MMA. et al. Hyaluronic acid: a new approach for the treatment of gingival recession—a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (21) 14330
• 32 Barbhai S, Shetty R, Joshi P. et al. Evaluation of root anatomy and canal configuration of human permanent maxillary first molar using cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (16) 10160