Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2024; 57(02): 099-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1781447
Original Article

Longitudinal Volume Assessment of Reconstructed Breast Using Three-Dimensional Measurement: How Do DIEP and LD Flap Change Immediately after Surgery?

Hiroki Utsunomiya 
1   Department of Surgery–Plastic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Ryutaro Tanaka
1   Department of Surgery–Plastic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Shuryo Akamine
1   Department of Surgery–Plastic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Taro Kusano
2   Kusano Taro Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
,
Tomoaki Kuroki
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Koichi Kadomatsu
4   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps are two widely used autologous breast reconstructions. Despite studies on flap-volume changes, the time of the first measurement is not immediately after surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the change in volume over time from the immediate postoperative period using a three-dimensional (3D) scanner.

Methods Patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a DIEP or LD flap between October 2019 and December 2020 at Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital were included. The Kinect 3D scanner was used to measure the reconstructed and healthy breast volumes immediately after surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The control group was the healthy side, and the volumes obtained at each time point and ratios (to the immediate postoperative period) were calculated and analyzed using a linear mixed model.

Results Of the 25 patients and 26 breasts examined, the postoperative increase in volume ratios was statistically significant in the DIEP flap group, except for the sixth month, but decreased significantly in the LD group. Compared with the control group, the volume ratio was significantly higher up to 3 months in the DIEP flap group and decreased significantly after 3 months in the LD flap group.

Conclusions The volume of the LD flap continued to decrease immediately after surgery, whereas the volume of the DIEP flap increased by 10% up to 1M. Therefore, this increase in volume should be taken into consideration in studies where the initial measurements were not taken immediately after surgery.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - latissimus dorsi - perforator flap - magnetic resonance imaging - supine position

Authors' Contributions

U.H. and K.K. conceived and designed the analysis. U.H., T.R., A.S., and K.T. helped in data collection.


U.H. and K.T. contributed to data/analysis tools.


U.H. performed the analysis and wrote the article.


Ethical Approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not obtained for this noninvasive, retrospective study based on patients conducted using their medical records. The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.




Publication History

Article published online:
18 March 2024

© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Chatterjee JS, Lee A, Anderson W. et al. Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on autologous deep inferior epigastric perforator flap volume after immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2009; 96 (10) 1135-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cho KJ, Joo YH, Sun DI, Kim MS. Perioperative clinical factors affecting volume changes of reconstructed flaps in head and neck cancer patients: free versus regional flaps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (07) 1061-1065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fujioka M, Masuda K, Imamura Y. Fatty tissue atrophy of free flap used for head and neck reconstruction. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (01) 32-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Joo YH, Hwang SH, Sun DI, Park JO, Cho KJ, Kim MS. Assessment of volume changes of radial forearm free flaps in head and neck cancer: long-term results. Oral Oncol 2011; 47 (01) 72-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yamaguchi K, Kimata Y, Onoda S, Mizukawa N, Onoda T. Quantitative analysis of free flap volume changes in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2012; 34 (10) 1403-1407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sakamoto Y, Takahara T, Ota Y. et al. MRI analysis of chronological changes in free-flap volume in head and neck reconstruction by volumetry. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2014; 39 (01) 44-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sakamoto Y, Yanamoto S, Ota Y, Furudoi S, Komori T, Umeda M. Magnitude of myocutaneous flaps and factors associated with loss of volume in oral cancer reconstructive surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (03) 644-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kimura M, Takada K, Ishibashi K. et al. Quantitative analysis of chronological changes in the volume of flaps used for reconstruction of oral cavity defects. J Oral Sci 2017; 59 (04) 499-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wilting FNH, Hameeteman M, Tielemans HJP, Ulrich DJO, Hummelink S. “Three-dimensional evaluation of breast volume changes following autologous free flap breast reconstruction over six months”. Breast 2020; 50: 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Eder M, v Waldenfels F, Sichtermann M. et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (09) 1152-1160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kang CM, Shim JS, Park SH, Jeong YJ, Seol KH, Kwak SG. Volume change of muscle and fat portions of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap after breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (04) e3536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Myung Y, Son Y, Nam TH. et al. Objective assessment of flap volume changes and aesthetic results after adjuvant radiation therapy in patients undergoing immediate autologous breast reconstruction. PLoS One 2018; 13 (05) e0197615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S. Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 2001; 10 (02) 117-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (01) 58-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R. et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 2007; 16 (02) 137-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Szychta P, Raine C, Butterworth M. et al. Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging. Comput Biol Med 2014; 44: 136-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kojima Y, Kuroki T, Sasaki Y. et al. Comparative study of breast measurements using a 3D scanner and manual breast measurements using a drawing instrument. Showa Gakushikai J 2021; 81: 297-305
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Henseler H, Kuznetsova A, Vogt P, Rosenhahn B. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (04) 483-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pöhlmann STL, Harkness E, Taylor CJ, Gandhi A, Astley SM. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (08) 1059-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Greenhowe J, Stephen C, McClymont L, Munnoch DA. Breast oedema following free flap breast reconstruction. Breast 2017; 34: 73-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Oashi K, Furukawa H, Akita S. et al. Vascularised fat flaps lose 44% of their weight 24 weeks after transplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (10) 1403-1409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar